Danielle M Weber, Justin A Lavner, Steven R H Beach
{"title":"农村黑人夫妇在接受预防性关系干预后对关系满意度的不同轨迹。","authors":"Danielle M Weber, Justin A Lavner, Steven R H Beach","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined variability in response to a couple and relationship education program for Black coparenting couples using group-based trajectory modeling. We identified groups of couples with different relationship satisfaction trajectories across a 2-year period following preintervention assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Black couples with a preadolescent child were randomized to the Protecting Strong African American Families intervention (N = 170) or a control condition (N = 174) and reported on their relationship satisfaction preintervention and approximately 9, 17, and 25 months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated two trajectory groups among men and women receiving the intervention, comprising a large group consistently high in relationship satisfaction over time and a smaller group with moderate, stable satisfaction over time. In the control condition, there was also a large group of men and women who remained consistently high in satisfaction, but the smaller group with initially moderate satisfaction experienced decreased satisfaction over time. Trajectories among men and women in the moderate groups differed by treatment condition, reflecting nonsignificant change (i.e., stable satisfaction) for those receiving intervention and significant decline for controls. Trajectories among women in the high group also differed by treatment condition, reflecting better functioning among women receiving intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicated many benefits of intervention, most notably the stabilization of satisfaction among couples beginning with moderate satisfaction (who experienced declining satisfaction in the control condition). Similar examination of within-sample variability in response to other couple and relationship education programs may enhance understanding of specific treatment effects and guide identification of those most likely to benefit from relationship intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different trajectories of relationship satisfaction among rural Black couples following preventive relationship intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle M Weber, Justin A Lavner, Steven R H Beach\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ccp0000894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined variability in response to a couple and relationship education program for Black coparenting couples using group-based trajectory modeling. We identified groups of couples with different relationship satisfaction trajectories across a 2-year period following preintervention assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Black couples with a preadolescent child were randomized to the Protecting Strong African American Families intervention (N = 170) or a control condition (N = 174) and reported on their relationship satisfaction preintervention and approximately 9, 17, and 25 months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated two trajectory groups among men and women receiving the intervention, comprising a large group consistently high in relationship satisfaction over time and a smaller group with moderate, stable satisfaction over time. In the control condition, there was also a large group of men and women who remained consistently high in satisfaction, but the smaller group with initially moderate satisfaction experienced decreased satisfaction over time. Trajectories among men and women in the moderate groups differed by treatment condition, reflecting nonsignificant change (i.e., stable satisfaction) for those receiving intervention and significant decline for controls. Trajectories among women in the high group also differed by treatment condition, reflecting better functioning among women receiving intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicated many benefits of intervention, most notably the stabilization of satisfaction among couples beginning with moderate satisfaction (who experienced declining satisfaction in the control condition). Similar examination of within-sample variability in response to other couple and relationship education programs may enhance understanding of specific treatment effects and guide identification of those most likely to benefit from relationship intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000894\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Different trajectories of relationship satisfaction among rural Black couples following preventive relationship intervention.
Objective: This study examined variability in response to a couple and relationship education program for Black coparenting couples using group-based trajectory modeling. We identified groups of couples with different relationship satisfaction trajectories across a 2-year period following preintervention assessment.
Method: Black couples with a preadolescent child were randomized to the Protecting Strong African American Families intervention (N = 170) or a control condition (N = 174) and reported on their relationship satisfaction preintervention and approximately 9, 17, and 25 months later.
Results: Results indicated two trajectory groups among men and women receiving the intervention, comprising a large group consistently high in relationship satisfaction over time and a smaller group with moderate, stable satisfaction over time. In the control condition, there was also a large group of men and women who remained consistently high in satisfaction, but the smaller group with initially moderate satisfaction experienced decreased satisfaction over time. Trajectories among men and women in the moderate groups differed by treatment condition, reflecting nonsignificant change (i.e., stable satisfaction) for those receiving intervention and significant decline for controls. Trajectories among women in the high group also differed by treatment condition, reflecting better functioning among women receiving intervention.
Conclusions: Results indicated many benefits of intervention, most notably the stabilization of satisfaction among couples beginning with moderate satisfaction (who experienced declining satisfaction in the control condition). Similar examination of within-sample variability in response to other couple and relationship education programs may enhance understanding of specific treatment effects and guide identification of those most likely to benefit from relationship intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.