Eleanor M Schmidt, Lucy Ward, W Thomas Gregory, Sara B Cichowski
{"title":"美国泌尿妇科医疗服务的地理分布。","authors":"Eleanor M Schmidt, Lucy Ward, W Thomas Gregory, Sara B Cichowski","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although access to urogynecologic care is known to influence patient outcomes, less is known regarding geographic access to care and how it may vary by population characteristics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to estimate geographic accessibility of urogynecologic services in terms of drive time and by population demographics.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a descriptive study using practice location data by zip code for all board-certified urogynecologists who are American Urogynecologic Society members (n = 497) and pelvic floor physical therapists (n = 985). Drive times from each zip code to the nearest health care professional zip code were calculated. These data were then overlaid onto a map of the continental United States. Race/ethnicity, age, education, poverty status, disability status, health insurance coverage, and rurality were compared across travel times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 31,754 zip codes of the continental United States, 389 (1.23%) had at least 1 urogynecologist, and 785 (2.47%) had at least 1 pelvic floor physical therapist; 92.29 million women older than 35 years were represented in the demographic analyses. Seventy-nine percent of the studied population live within 1 hour of a urogynecologist, and 85% live within 1 hour of a pelvic floor physical therapist. Seven percent and 3% live >2 hours from urogynecologic services, respectively. Values for drive times to all health care professionals indicate that American Indian/Alaska Native individuals have a much greater travel burden than other racial/ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are population groups with limited geographic access to urogynecologic services. Pelvic floor physical therapists are more geographically accessible to the population studied than urogynecologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic Access to Urogynecology Care in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor M Schmidt, Lucy Ward, W Thomas Gregory, Sara B Cichowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although access to urogynecologic care is known to influence patient outcomes, less is known regarding geographic access to care and how it may vary by population characteristics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to estimate geographic accessibility of urogynecologic services in terms of drive time and by population demographics.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a descriptive study using practice location data by zip code for all board-certified urogynecologists who are American Urogynecologic Society members (n = 497) and pelvic floor physical therapists (n = 985). Drive times from each zip code to the nearest health care professional zip code were calculated. These data were then overlaid onto a map of the continental United States. Race/ethnicity, age, education, poverty status, disability status, health insurance coverage, and rurality were compared across travel times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 31,754 zip codes of the continental United States, 389 (1.23%) had at least 1 urogynecologist, and 785 (2.47%) had at least 1 pelvic floor physical therapist; 92.29 million women older than 35 years were represented in the demographic analyses. Seventy-nine percent of the studied population live within 1 hour of a urogynecologist, and 85% live within 1 hour of a pelvic floor physical therapist. Seven percent and 3% live >2 hours from urogynecologic services, respectively. Values for drive times to all health care professionals indicate that American Indian/Alaska Native individuals have a much greater travel burden than other racial/ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are population groups with limited geographic access to urogynecologic services. Pelvic floor physical therapists are more geographically accessible to the population studied than urogynecologists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Geographic Access to Urogynecology Care in the United States.
Importance: Although access to urogynecologic care is known to influence patient outcomes, less is known regarding geographic access to care and how it may vary by population characteristics.
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to estimate geographic accessibility of urogynecologic services in terms of drive time and by population demographics.
Study design: We performed a descriptive study using practice location data by zip code for all board-certified urogynecologists who are American Urogynecologic Society members (n = 497) and pelvic floor physical therapists (n = 985). Drive times from each zip code to the nearest health care professional zip code were calculated. These data were then overlaid onto a map of the continental United States. Race/ethnicity, age, education, poverty status, disability status, health insurance coverage, and rurality were compared across travel times.
Results: Of the 31,754 zip codes of the continental United States, 389 (1.23%) had at least 1 urogynecologist, and 785 (2.47%) had at least 1 pelvic floor physical therapist; 92.29 million women older than 35 years were represented in the demographic analyses. Seventy-nine percent of the studied population live within 1 hour of a urogynecologist, and 85% live within 1 hour of a pelvic floor physical therapist. Seven percent and 3% live >2 hours from urogynecologic services, respectively. Values for drive times to all health care professionals indicate that American Indian/Alaska Native individuals have a much greater travel burden than other racial/ethnic groups.
Conclusions: There are population groups with limited geographic access to urogynecologic services. Pelvic floor physical therapists are more geographically accessible to the population studied than urogynecologists.