基于舒适区边界的自动紧急制动算法对中国汽车与电动两轮车碰撞事故的评估

IF 2.3 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IET Intelligent Transport Systems Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1049/itr2.12532
Xiaomi Yang, Nils Lubbe, Jonas Bärgman
{"title":"基于舒适区边界的自动紧急制动算法对中国汽车与电动两轮车碰撞事故的评估","authors":"Xiaomi Yang,&nbsp;Nils Lubbe,&nbsp;Jonas Bärgman","doi":"10.1049/itr2.12532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crashes between cars and powered two-wheelers (PTWs: motorcycles, scooters, and e-bikes) are a safety concern; as a result, developing car safety systems that protect PTW riders is essential. While the pre-crash protection system automated emergency braking (AEB) has been shown to avoid and mitigate injuries for car-to-car, car-to-cyclist, and car-to-pedestrian crashes, much is still unknown about its effectiveness in car-to-PTW crashes. Further, the characteristics of the crashes that remain after the introduction of such systems in traffic are also largely unknown. This study estimates the crash avoidance and injury risk reduction performance of six different PTW-AEB algorithms that were virtually applied to reconstructed car-to-PTW pre-crash kinematics extracted from a Chinese in-depth crash database. Five of the algorithms include combinations of drivers’ and PTW riders’ comfort zone boundaries for braking and steering, while the sixth is a traditional AEB. Results show that the average safety performance of the algorithms using only the driver's comfort zone boundaries is higher than that of the traditional AEB algorithm. All algorithms resulted in similar distributions of impact speed and impact locations, which means that in-crash protection systems likely can be made less complex, not having to consider differences in AEB algorithm design among car manufacturers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50381,"journal":{"name":"IET Intelligent Transport Systems","volume":"18 9","pages":"1599-1615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/itr2.12532","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of comfort zone boundary based automated emergency braking algorithms for car-to-powered-two-wheeler crashes in China\",\"authors\":\"Xiaomi Yang,&nbsp;Nils Lubbe,&nbsp;Jonas Bärgman\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/itr2.12532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Crashes between cars and powered two-wheelers (PTWs: motorcycles, scooters, and e-bikes) are a safety concern; as a result, developing car safety systems that protect PTW riders is essential. While the pre-crash protection system automated emergency braking (AEB) has been shown to avoid and mitigate injuries for car-to-car, car-to-cyclist, and car-to-pedestrian crashes, much is still unknown about its effectiveness in car-to-PTW crashes. Further, the characteristics of the crashes that remain after the introduction of such systems in traffic are also largely unknown. This study estimates the crash avoidance and injury risk reduction performance of six different PTW-AEB algorithms that were virtually applied to reconstructed car-to-PTW pre-crash kinematics extracted from a Chinese in-depth crash database. Five of the algorithms include combinations of drivers’ and PTW riders’ comfort zone boundaries for braking and steering, while the sixth is a traditional AEB. Results show that the average safety performance of the algorithms using only the driver's comfort zone boundaries is higher than that of the traditional AEB algorithm. All algorithms resulted in similar distributions of impact speed and impact locations, which means that in-crash protection systems likely can be made less complex, not having to consider differences in AEB algorithm design among car manufacturers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Intelligent Transport Systems\",\"volume\":\"18 9\",\"pages\":\"1599-1615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/itr2.12532\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Intelligent Transport Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/itr2.12532\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Intelligent Transport Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/itr2.12532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汽车与机动两轮车(PTW:摩托车、踏板车和电动自行车)之间的碰撞是一个安全问题;因此,开发能够保护机动两轮车骑行者的汽车安全系统至关重要。虽然碰撞前保护系统自动紧急制动(AEB)已被证明可以避免和减轻汽车与汽车、汽车与骑自行车者以及汽车与行人之间的碰撞伤害,但其在汽车与 PTW 碰撞中的有效性还有很多未知之处。此外,在交通中引入此类系统后,碰撞事故的特点在很大程度上也是未知的。本研究估算了六种不同的 PTW-AEB 算法在避免碰撞和降低伤害风险方面的性能,这些算法实际上应用于从中国深度碰撞数据库中提取的重建的车对车碰撞前运动学数据。其中五种算法包括驾驶员和 PTW 驾驶员制动和转向舒适区边界的组合,第六种算法是传统的 AEB。结果表明,仅使用驾驶员舒适区边界的算法的平均安全性能高于传统 AEB 算法。所有算法导致的撞击速度和撞击位置分布相似,这意味着碰撞保护系统有可能变得不那么复杂,而不必考虑汽车制造商在 AEB 算法设计上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of comfort zone boundary based automated emergency braking algorithms for car-to-powered-two-wheeler crashes in China

Crashes between cars and powered two-wheelers (PTWs: motorcycles, scooters, and e-bikes) are a safety concern; as a result, developing car safety systems that protect PTW riders is essential. While the pre-crash protection system automated emergency braking (AEB) has been shown to avoid and mitigate injuries for car-to-car, car-to-cyclist, and car-to-pedestrian crashes, much is still unknown about its effectiveness in car-to-PTW crashes. Further, the characteristics of the crashes that remain after the introduction of such systems in traffic are also largely unknown. This study estimates the crash avoidance and injury risk reduction performance of six different PTW-AEB algorithms that were virtually applied to reconstructed car-to-PTW pre-crash kinematics extracted from a Chinese in-depth crash database. Five of the algorithms include combinations of drivers’ and PTW riders’ comfort zone boundaries for braking and steering, while the sixth is a traditional AEB. Results show that the average safety performance of the algorithms using only the driver's comfort zone boundaries is higher than that of the traditional AEB algorithm. All algorithms resulted in similar distributions of impact speed and impact locations, which means that in-crash protection systems likely can be made less complex, not having to consider differences in AEB algorithm design among car manufacturers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IET Intelligent Transport Systems
IET Intelligent Transport Systems 工程技术-运输科技
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: IET Intelligent Transport Systems is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to research into the practical applications of ITS and infrastructures. The scope of the journal includes the following: Sustainable traffic solutions Deployments with enabling technologies Pervasive monitoring Applications; demonstrations and evaluation Economic and behavioural analyses of ITS services and scenario Data Integration and analytics Information collection and processing; image processing applications in ITS ITS aspects of electric vehicles Autonomous vehicles; connected vehicle systems; In-vehicle ITS, safety and vulnerable road user aspects Mobility as a service systems Traffic management and control Public transport systems technologies Fleet and public transport logistics Emergency and incident management Demand management and electronic payment systems Traffic related air pollution management Policy and institutional issues Interoperability, standards and architectures Funding scenarios Enforcement Human machine interaction Education, training and outreach Current Special Issue Call for papers: Intelligent Transportation Systems in Smart Cities for Sustainable Environment - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_ITS_CFP_ITSSCSE.pdf Sustainably Intelligent Mobility (SIM) - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_ITS_CFP_SIM.pdf Traffic Theory and Modelling in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (in collaboration with World Congress for Transport Research, WCTR 2019) - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_ITS_CFP_WCTR.pdf
期刊最新文献
Exploring changes in residents' daily activity patterns through sequence visualization analysis Multispectral pedestrian detection based on feature complementation and enhancement Self-supervised vessel trajectory segmentation via learning spatio-temporal semantics Optimizing customized bus services for multi-trip urban passengers: A bi-objective approach Assessing the performance of a hybrid max-weight traffic signal control algorithm in the presence of noisy queue information: An evaluation of the environmental impacts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1