人工智能在嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎中的应用现状:系统综述

M. Votto, C. M. Rossi, S. Caimmi, M. De Filippo, A. Di Sabatino, M. V. Lenti, A. Raffaele, G. L. Marseglia, A. Licari
{"title":"人工智能在嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎中的应用现状:系统综述","authors":"M. Votto, C. M. Rossi, S. Caimmi, M. De Filippo, A. Di Sabatino, M. V. Lenti, A. Raffaele, G. L. Marseglia, A. Licari","doi":"10.3390/bdcc8070076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly being integrated into computer-aided diagnosis systems that can be applied to improve the recognition and clinical and molecular characterization of allergic diseases, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). This review aims to systematically evaluate current applications of AI, machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) methods in EoE characterization and management. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using a registered protocol published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023451048). The risk of bias and applicability of eligible studies were assessed according to the prediction model study risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to retrieve the articles. The literature review was performed in May 2023. We included original research articles (retrospective or prospective studies) published in English in peer-reviewed journals, studies whose participants were patients with EoE, and studies assessing the application of AI, ML, or DL models. Results: A total of 120 articles were found. After removing 68 duplicates, 52 articles were reviewed based on the title and abstract, and 34 were excluded. Eleven full texts were assessed for eligibility, met the inclusion criteria, and were analyzed for the systematic review. The AI models developed in three studies for identifying EoE based on endoscopic images showed high score performance with an accuracy that ranged from 0.92 to 0.97. Five studies developed AI models that histologically identified EoE with high accuracy (87% to 99%). We also found two studies where the AI model identified subgroups of patients according to their clinical and molecular features. Conclusions: AI technologies could promote more accurate evidence-based management of EoE by integrating the results of molecular signature, clinical, histology, and endoscopic features. However, the era of AI application in medicine is just beginning; therefore, further studies with model validation in the real-world environment are required.","PeriodicalId":505155,"journal":{"name":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"M. Votto, C. M. Rossi, S. Caimmi, M. De Filippo, A. Di Sabatino, M. V. Lenti, A. Raffaele, G. L. Marseglia, A. Licari\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bdcc8070076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly being integrated into computer-aided diagnosis systems that can be applied to improve the recognition and clinical and molecular characterization of allergic diseases, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). This review aims to systematically evaluate current applications of AI, machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) methods in EoE characterization and management. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using a registered protocol published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023451048). The risk of bias and applicability of eligible studies were assessed according to the prediction model study risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to retrieve the articles. The literature review was performed in May 2023. We included original research articles (retrospective or prospective studies) published in English in peer-reviewed journals, studies whose participants were patients with EoE, and studies assessing the application of AI, ML, or DL models. Results: A total of 120 articles were found. After removing 68 duplicates, 52 articles were reviewed based on the title and abstract, and 34 were excluded. Eleven full texts were assessed for eligibility, met the inclusion criteria, and were analyzed for the systematic review. The AI models developed in three studies for identifying EoE based on endoscopic images showed high score performance with an accuracy that ranged from 0.92 to 0.97. Five studies developed AI models that histologically identified EoE with high accuracy (87% to 99%). We also found two studies where the AI model identified subgroups of patients according to their clinical and molecular features. Conclusions: AI technologies could promote more accurate evidence-based management of EoE by integrating the results of molecular signature, clinical, histology, and endoscopic features. However, the era of AI application in medicine is just beginning; therefore, further studies with model validation in the real-world environment are required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Big Data and Cognitive Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Big Data and Cognitive Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8070076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8070076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:人工智能(AI)工具正被越来越多地集成到计算机辅助诊断系统中,这些系统可用于改善过敏性疾病(包括嗜酸性食管炎(EoE))的识别、临床和分子特征描述。本综述旨在系统评估当前人工智能、机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)方法在食管炎表征和管理中的应用。方法:我们采用国际系统综述前瞻性注册表(CRD42023451048)中公布的注册协议进行了系统综述。根据预测模型研究偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估了符合条件的研究的偏倚风险和适用性。我们对 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 进行了检索。文献综述于 2023 年 5 月完成。我们纳入了在同行评审期刊上发表的英文原创研究文章(回顾性或前瞻性研究)、参与者为EoE患者的研究以及评估人工智能、ML或DL模型应用的研究。结果:共找到 120 篇文章。在删除 68 篇重复文章后,根据标题和摘要对 52 篇文章进行了审查,其中 34 篇被排除。对 11 篇全文进行了资格评估,符合纳入标准,并对其进行了系统综述分析。三项研究开发的人工智能模型可根据内窥镜图像识别EoE,其准确率介于0.92至0.97之间,得分表现优异。五项研究开发的人工智能模型通过组织学鉴定出了高准确率(87% 到 99%)的 EoE。我们还发现两项研究中,人工智能模型根据患者的临床和分子特征识别了亚组患者。研究结论通过整合分子特征、临床、组织学和内窥镜特征的结果,人工智能技术可促进对咽喉炎进行更准确的循证管理。然而,人工智能应用于医学的时代才刚刚开始;因此,还需要在真实世界环境中进行进一步的模型验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly being integrated into computer-aided diagnosis systems that can be applied to improve the recognition and clinical and molecular characterization of allergic diseases, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). This review aims to systematically evaluate current applications of AI, machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) methods in EoE characterization and management. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using a registered protocol published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023451048). The risk of bias and applicability of eligible studies were assessed according to the prediction model study risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to retrieve the articles. The literature review was performed in May 2023. We included original research articles (retrospective or prospective studies) published in English in peer-reviewed journals, studies whose participants were patients with EoE, and studies assessing the application of AI, ML, or DL models. Results: A total of 120 articles were found. After removing 68 duplicates, 52 articles were reviewed based on the title and abstract, and 34 were excluded. Eleven full texts were assessed for eligibility, met the inclusion criteria, and were analyzed for the systematic review. The AI models developed in three studies for identifying EoE based on endoscopic images showed high score performance with an accuracy that ranged from 0.92 to 0.97. Five studies developed AI models that histologically identified EoE with high accuracy (87% to 99%). We also found two studies where the AI model identified subgroups of patients according to their clinical and molecular features. Conclusions: AI technologies could promote more accurate evidence-based management of EoE by integrating the results of molecular signature, clinical, histology, and endoscopic features. However, the era of AI application in medicine is just beginning; therefore, further studies with model validation in the real-world environment are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Breast Cancer Detection and Localizing the Mass Area Using Deep Learning Trends and Challenges Towards Effective Data-Driven Decision Making in UK Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Case Studies and Lessons Learnt from the Analysis of 85 Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Demystifying Mental Health by Decoding Facial Action Unit Sequences AMIKOMNET: Novel Structure for a Deep Learning Model to Enhance COVID-19 Classification Task Performance The State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1