老年高血压患者强化和标准降压安全性的 Meta 分析

Chao Fang, Nuan Xiao, Jiannan Wu, Yuanxin Tian, Hongmei Zhao, Simin Ren
{"title":"老年高血压患者强化和标准降压安全性的 Meta 分析","authors":"Chao Fang, Nuan Xiao, Jiannan Wu, Yuanxin Tian, Hongmei Zhao, Simin Ren","doi":"10.32629/jcmr.v5i2.2318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effect of intensive and standard antihypertensive pressure on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, serious adverse events and all-cause deaths in elderly hypertensive patients. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang and CBM databases were searched. All of the included studies were the RCT trials. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to evaluate differences in enhanced and standard antihypertensive outcomes. Statistical analysis was applied using the Stata 17.0 software. Results: Seven tests were retrieved to meet the conditions, Different antihypertensive effects showed overall statistical differences in the incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, Significant decrease in the intensive antihypertensive group [P=0.000, RR95%CI:0.79(0.69-0.90)], Among them, the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was significantly reduced in the intensive antihypertensive group [P=0.000, RR95%CI:0.62(0.48-0.81)], The incidence of stroke events was significantly fewer in the intensive group [P=0.000, RR95%CI:0.62(0.48-0.81)]; There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute HF (AHF) between the two groups [P=0.242, RR95%CI:0.55(0.20-1.50)]. There was no significant statistical difference in the incidence of serious adverse events overall by different antihypertensive criteria [P=0.251,RR95%CI:1.12(0.92-1.36)], of which two groups were eGFR<30ml/min/1.73m2There was no significant statistical difference in the incidence [P=0.280,RR95%CI:1.46(0.74-2.89)], no significant statistical difference in the incidence of orthostatic hypotension [P=0.473,RR95%CI:1.47(0.51-4.23)], no significant statistical difference in the incidence of falls [P=0.607,RR95%CI:1.24(0.54-42.86)], and the incidence of syncope in the intensive antihypertensive group was higher than that in the standard antihypertensive group [P=0.009,RR95%CI:2.43(1.24-4.77)]. There was no significant statistical difference in the effect of different antihypertensive criteria on all-cause death [P=0.156,RR95%CI:0.92(0.81-1.03)]. Conclusion: Compared with the standard antihypertensive in elderly patients with hypertension, there is no significant statistical difference in the incidence of serious adverse events and all-cause mortality in the elderly, and the incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in the elderly.","PeriodicalId":15431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Meta-analysis of Intensive and Standard Antihypertensive Safety in Elderly Hypertensive Patients\",\"authors\":\"Chao Fang, Nuan Xiao, Jiannan Wu, Yuanxin Tian, Hongmei Zhao, Simin Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.32629/jcmr.v5i2.2318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the effect of intensive and standard antihypertensive pressure on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, serious adverse events and all-cause deaths in elderly hypertensive patients. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang and CBM databases were searched. All of the included studies were the RCT trials. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to evaluate differences in enhanced and standard antihypertensive outcomes. Statistical analysis was applied using the Stata 17.0 software. Results: Seven tests were retrieved to meet the conditions, Different antihypertensive effects showed overall statistical differences in the incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, Significant decrease in the intensive antihypertensive group [P=0.000, RR95%CI:0.79(0.69-0.90)], Among them, the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was significantly reduced in the intensive antihypertensive group [P=0.000, RR95%CI:0.62(0.48-0.81)], The incidence of stroke events was significantly fewer in the intensive group [P=0.000, RR95%CI:0.62(0.48-0.81)]; There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute HF (AHF) between the two groups [P=0.242, RR95%CI:0.55(0.20-1.50)]. There was no significant statistical difference in the incidence of serious adverse events overall by different antihypertensive criteria [P=0.251,RR95%CI:1.12(0.92-1.36)], of which two groups were eGFR<30ml/min/1.73m2There was no significant statistical difference in the incidence [P=0.280,RR95%CI:1.46(0.74-2.89)], no significant statistical difference in the incidence of orthostatic hypotension [P=0.473,RR95%CI:1.47(0.51-4.23)], no significant statistical difference in the incidence of falls [P=0.607,RR95%CI:1.24(0.54-42.86)], and the incidence of syncope in the intensive antihypertensive group was higher than that in the standard antihypertensive group [P=0.009,RR95%CI:2.43(1.24-4.77)]. There was no significant statistical difference in the effect of different antihypertensive criteria on all-cause death [P=0.156,RR95%CI:0.92(0.81-1.03)]. Conclusion: Compared with the standard antihypertensive in elderly patients with hypertension, there is no significant statistical difference in the incidence of serious adverse events and all-cause mortality in the elderly, and the incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in the elderly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32629/jcmr.v5i2.2318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jcmr.v5i2.2318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估强化降压和标准降压对老年高血压患者心脑血管事件、严重不良事件和全因死亡的影响。研究方法检索了 Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane、CNKI、万方和 CBM 数据库。所有纳入的研究均为 RCT 试验。使用相对风险(RR)和 95% 置信区间(95%CI)来评估增强型和标准型降压结果的差异。统计分析采用 Stata 17.0 软件。结果不同降压效果对心脑血管事件发生率的总体统计学差异显示,强化降压组显著下降[P=0.000,RR95%CI:0.79(0.69-0. 90)],其中强化降压组心脑血管事件发生率显著下降[P=0.000,RR95%CI:0.79(0.69-0. 90)]。其中,急性心肌梗死(AMI)和急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的发生率在强化降压组明显降低[P=0.000,RR95%CI:0.62(0.48-0.P=0.000,RR95%CI:0.62(0.48-0.81)],强化组卒中事件发生率明显降低[P=0.000,RR95%CI:0.62(0.48-0.81)];两组急性心力衰竭(AHF)发生率无明显差异[P=0.242,RR95%CI:0.55(0.20-1.50)]。不同降压标准严重不良事件发生率总体无明显统计学差异[P=0.251,RR95%CI:1.12(0.92-1.36)],其中两组 eGFR<30ml/min/1.73m2 发生率无明显统计学差异[P=0.280,RR95%CI:1.46(0.74-2.P=0.280,RR95%CI:1.46(0.74-2.89)]、正性低血压发生率无明显统计学差异[P=0.473,RR95%CI:1.47(0.51-4.23)]、跌倒发生率无明显统计学差异[P=0.607,RR95%CI:1.24(0.54-42.86)],强化降压组晕厥发生率高于标准降压组[P=0.009,RR95%CI:2.43(1.24-4.77)]。不同降压标准对全因死亡的影响无明显统计学差异[P=0.156,RR95%CI:0.92(0.81-1.03)]。结论与标准降压相比,老年高血压患者严重不良事件发生率和全因死亡率、老年心脑血管事件发生率无明显统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Meta-analysis of Intensive and Standard Antihypertensive Safety in Elderly Hypertensive Patients
Objective: To evaluate the effect of intensive and standard antihypertensive pressure on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, serious adverse events and all-cause deaths in elderly hypertensive patients. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang and CBM databases were searched. All of the included studies were the RCT trials. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to evaluate differences in enhanced and standard antihypertensive outcomes. Statistical analysis was applied using the Stata 17.0 software. Results: Seven tests were retrieved to meet the conditions, Different antihypertensive effects showed overall statistical differences in the incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, Significant decrease in the intensive antihypertensive group [P=0.000, RR95%CI:0.79(0.69-0.90)], Among them, the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was significantly reduced in the intensive antihypertensive group [P=0.000, RR95%CI:0.62(0.48-0.81)], The incidence of stroke events was significantly fewer in the intensive group [P=0.000, RR95%CI:0.62(0.48-0.81)]; There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute HF (AHF) between the two groups [P=0.242, RR95%CI:0.55(0.20-1.50)]. There was no significant statistical difference in the incidence of serious adverse events overall by different antihypertensive criteria [P=0.251,RR95%CI:1.12(0.92-1.36)], of which two groups were eGFR<30ml/min/1.73m2There was no significant statistical difference in the incidence [P=0.280,RR95%CI:1.46(0.74-2.89)], no significant statistical difference in the incidence of orthostatic hypotension [P=0.473,RR95%CI:1.47(0.51-4.23)], no significant statistical difference in the incidence of falls [P=0.607,RR95%CI:1.24(0.54-42.86)], and the incidence of syncope in the intensive antihypertensive group was higher than that in the standard antihypertensive group [P=0.009,RR95%CI:2.43(1.24-4.77)]. There was no significant statistical difference in the effect of different antihypertensive criteria on all-cause death [P=0.156,RR95%CI:0.92(0.81-1.03)]. Conclusion: Compared with the standard antihypertensive in elderly patients with hypertension, there is no significant statistical difference in the incidence of serious adverse events and all-cause mortality in the elderly, and the incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in the elderly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Preventive Care and Rehabilitation Nursing on Elderly Hypertension Meta-analysis of In-stent Restenosis Factors after Coronary Intervention Effect of Dietary Carotenoids and Lutein on Eye Health Maintenance in Elderly People One Case of Solar Dermatitis Treated with Umbilical Needle "Four Positions" Combined with Body Acupuncture Primary Presacral Neuroendocrine Tumors Presented by Lumbosacral Pain: a Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1