Fa-long Wang, A. Fa-you, Chuan-bing Zhu, Hua Zhang, Rao-sheng He, Rui Wang, Zhang-zhen Liu
{"title":"基于遥感解译和卷积神经网络的昆明盆地土地沉降易感性评价","authors":"Fa-long Wang, A. Fa-you, Chuan-bing Zhu, Hua Zhang, Rao-sheng He, Rui Wang, Zhang-zhen Liu","doi":"10.2174/0118722121326150240628071328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis study aims to utilize the Machine Learning (ML) model to produce highprecision\nmaps of urban ground subsidence susceptibility, providing a scientific basis for disaster\nprevention and mitigation efforts in the Kunming Basin.\n\n\n\nIn this patent study, remote sensing interpretation of Kunming City was conducted using\nSBAS-InSAR technology to acquire subsidence data. Based on the frequency ratio method, ten evaluative\nfactors with strong correlations were selected to establish an evaluation index system for the\nsubsidence susceptibility of the Kunming Basin. Five models, including CNN, Back Propagation\nNeural Network (BPNN), Genetic Algorithm optimized BPNN (GA-BPNN), Particle Swarm Optimization\noptimized BPNN (PSO-BPNN), and Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN),\nwere employed. The frequency ratio method and the ROC curve were used to compare the effectiveness\nand precision of these models.\n\n\n\nThe frequency ratio method indicated that the CNN model had the highest values in the very\nhigh and high susceptibility areas, reaching 4.10, which was the highest among all models; in the\nvery low and low susceptibility areas, its value was 0.34, which was the lowest among the models.\nThe ROC curve demonstrated that the CNN model, based on deep learning (AUC = 0.952), was\nmore precise than the machine learning-based models such as BPNN (AUC = 0.896), RBFNN (AUC\n= 0.917), GA-BPNN (AUC = 0.890), and PSO-BPNN (AUC = 0.906).\n\n\n\nThe CNN model has predicted that 81.06% of the ground subsidence grid cells fall into\nthe very high and high susceptibility categories, demonstrating good predictive performance. According\nto the established evaluation index system for ground subsidence susceptibility, the fundamental\ncauses of ground subsidence in the Kunming Basin are identified as poor soil mechanical\nproperties and low bearing capacity, while construction activities have exacerbated the development\nof ground subsidence.\n","PeriodicalId":40022,"journal":{"name":"Recent Patents on Engineering","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Land Subsidence Susceptibility in Kunming Basin Based on\\nRemote Sensing Interpretation and Convolutional Neural Network\",\"authors\":\"Fa-long Wang, A. Fa-you, Chuan-bing Zhu, Hua Zhang, Rao-sheng He, Rui Wang, Zhang-zhen Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0118722121326150240628071328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThis study aims to utilize the Machine Learning (ML) model to produce highprecision\\nmaps of urban ground subsidence susceptibility, providing a scientific basis for disaster\\nprevention and mitigation efforts in the Kunming Basin.\\n\\n\\n\\nIn this patent study, remote sensing interpretation of Kunming City was conducted using\\nSBAS-InSAR technology to acquire subsidence data. Based on the frequency ratio method, ten evaluative\\nfactors with strong correlations were selected to establish an evaluation index system for the\\nsubsidence susceptibility of the Kunming Basin. Five models, including CNN, Back Propagation\\nNeural Network (BPNN), Genetic Algorithm optimized BPNN (GA-BPNN), Particle Swarm Optimization\\noptimized BPNN (PSO-BPNN), and Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN),\\nwere employed. The frequency ratio method and the ROC curve were used to compare the effectiveness\\nand precision of these models.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe frequency ratio method indicated that the CNN model had the highest values in the very\\nhigh and high susceptibility areas, reaching 4.10, which was the highest among all models; in the\\nvery low and low susceptibility areas, its value was 0.34, which was the lowest among the models.\\nThe ROC curve demonstrated that the CNN model, based on deep learning (AUC = 0.952), was\\nmore precise than the machine learning-based models such as BPNN (AUC = 0.896), RBFNN (AUC\\n= 0.917), GA-BPNN (AUC = 0.890), and PSO-BPNN (AUC = 0.906).\\n\\n\\n\\nThe CNN model has predicted that 81.06% of the ground subsidence grid cells fall into\\nthe very high and high susceptibility categories, demonstrating good predictive performance. According\\nto the established evaluation index system for ground subsidence susceptibility, the fundamental\\ncauses of ground subsidence in the Kunming Basin are identified as poor soil mechanical\\nproperties and low bearing capacity, while construction activities have exacerbated the development\\nof ground subsidence.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":40022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recent Patents on Engineering\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recent Patents on Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118722121326150240628071328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Patents on Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118722121326150240628071328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Land Subsidence Susceptibility in Kunming Basin Based on
Remote Sensing Interpretation and Convolutional Neural Network
This study aims to utilize the Machine Learning (ML) model to produce highprecision
maps of urban ground subsidence susceptibility, providing a scientific basis for disaster
prevention and mitigation efforts in the Kunming Basin.
In this patent study, remote sensing interpretation of Kunming City was conducted using
SBAS-InSAR technology to acquire subsidence data. Based on the frequency ratio method, ten evaluative
factors with strong correlations were selected to establish an evaluation index system for the
subsidence susceptibility of the Kunming Basin. Five models, including CNN, Back Propagation
Neural Network (BPNN), Genetic Algorithm optimized BPNN (GA-BPNN), Particle Swarm Optimization
optimized BPNN (PSO-BPNN), and Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN),
were employed. The frequency ratio method and the ROC curve were used to compare the effectiveness
and precision of these models.
The frequency ratio method indicated that the CNN model had the highest values in the very
high and high susceptibility areas, reaching 4.10, which was the highest among all models; in the
very low and low susceptibility areas, its value was 0.34, which was the lowest among the models.
The ROC curve demonstrated that the CNN model, based on deep learning (AUC = 0.952), was
more precise than the machine learning-based models such as BPNN (AUC = 0.896), RBFNN (AUC
= 0.917), GA-BPNN (AUC = 0.890), and PSO-BPNN (AUC = 0.906).
The CNN model has predicted that 81.06% of the ground subsidence grid cells fall into
the very high and high susceptibility categories, demonstrating good predictive performance. According
to the established evaluation index system for ground subsidence susceptibility, the fundamental
causes of ground subsidence in the Kunming Basin are identified as poor soil mechanical
properties and low bearing capacity, while construction activities have exacerbated the development
of ground subsidence.
期刊介绍:
Recent Patents on Engineering publishes review articles by experts on recent patents in the major fields of engineering. A selection of important and recent patents on engineering is also included in the journal. The journal is essential reading for all researchers involved in engineering sciences.