解读可持续供应链中的碳排放合规性:碳审计合作的影响

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Omega-international Journal of Management Science Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2024.103143
Hongyong Fu , Yifeng Lei , Shuguang Zhang , Kexin Zhao , Yanlu Zhao
{"title":"解读可持续供应链中的碳排放合规性:碳审计合作的影响","authors":"Hongyong Fu ,&nbsp;Yifeng Lei ,&nbsp;Shuguang Zhang ,&nbsp;Kexin Zhao ,&nbsp;Yanlu Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, reducing carbon emissions is crucial to combat climate change. It has also prompted companies to comply with emission regulations and evaluate the environmental impacts of their supply chains. Yet, news and reports occasionally highlight industrial instances of noncompliance. In particular, supplier’s noncompliance is often mistakenly attributed to its downstream manufacturers. Due to this misconception, manufacturers might conduct audits to protect their reputation and sales. Moreover, because a supplier may provide components to multiple competing manufacturers, they may collaborate to share audit findings regarding the common supplier’s compliance with carbon emissions regulations. However, studies do not reveal how this audit cooperation affects stakeholder interests. Here, we introduce a stylised model to examine the effects of carbon audit cooperation on the environment, competing manufacturers, and their supplier. We identify two main effects: the <em>free-riding</em> and <em>amplifying</em> effects. The former benefits the supplier but harms the environment and competing manufacturers, while the latter presents the opposite effect. The net impact depends on the balance between these two effects, which challenges conventional beliefs about carbon emissions compliance and highlights the importance of sustainability in the industry. Finally, we explore various extensions to validate the robustness of our findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103143"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unravelling the carbon emissions compliance in sustainable supply chains: The impacts of carbon audit cooperation\",\"authors\":\"Hongyong Fu ,&nbsp;Yifeng Lei ,&nbsp;Shuguang Zhang ,&nbsp;Kexin Zhao ,&nbsp;Yanlu Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, reducing carbon emissions is crucial to combat climate change. It has also prompted companies to comply with emission regulations and evaluate the environmental impacts of their supply chains. Yet, news and reports occasionally highlight industrial instances of noncompliance. In particular, supplier’s noncompliance is often mistakenly attributed to its downstream manufacturers. Due to this misconception, manufacturers might conduct audits to protect their reputation and sales. Moreover, because a supplier may provide components to multiple competing manufacturers, they may collaborate to share audit findings regarding the common supplier’s compliance with carbon emissions regulations. However, studies do not reveal how this audit cooperation affects stakeholder interests. Here, we introduce a stylised model to examine the effects of carbon audit cooperation on the environment, competing manufacturers, and their supplier. We identify two main effects: the <em>free-riding</em> and <em>amplifying</em> effects. The former benefits the supplier but harms the environment and competing manufacturers, while the latter presents the opposite effect. The net impact depends on the balance between these two effects, which challenges conventional beliefs about carbon emissions compliance and highlights the importance of sustainability in the industry. Finally, we explore various extensions to validate the robustness of our findings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001099\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为 17 项可持续发展目标之一,减少碳排放对于应对气候变化至关重要。这也促使企业遵守排放法规,评估供应链对环境的影响。然而,新闻和报道偶尔也会强调一些不合规的工业案例。特别是,供应商的不合规行为往往被错误地归咎于其下游制造商。由于这种误解,制造商可能会进行审核,以保护自己的声誉和销售。此外,由于一家供应商可能会向多家相互竞争的制造商提供零部件,因此他们可能会合作分享有关共同供应商遵守碳排放法规情况的审计结果。然而,相关研究并未揭示这种审计合作如何影响利益相关者的利益。在此,我们引入一个风格化模型来研究碳审计合作对环境、竞争制造商及其供应商的影响。我们发现了两种主要影响:搭便车效应和放大效应。前者对供应商有利,但对环境和竞争制造商不利,后者则产生相反的影响。净影响取决于这两种效应之间的平衡,这对有关碳排放合规性的传统观念提出了挑战,并凸显了该行业可持续发展的重要性。最后,我们探讨了各种扩展,以验证我们研究结果的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unravelling the carbon emissions compliance in sustainable supply chains: The impacts of carbon audit cooperation

As one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, reducing carbon emissions is crucial to combat climate change. It has also prompted companies to comply with emission regulations and evaluate the environmental impacts of their supply chains. Yet, news and reports occasionally highlight industrial instances of noncompliance. In particular, supplier’s noncompliance is often mistakenly attributed to its downstream manufacturers. Due to this misconception, manufacturers might conduct audits to protect their reputation and sales. Moreover, because a supplier may provide components to multiple competing manufacturers, they may collaborate to share audit findings regarding the common supplier’s compliance with carbon emissions regulations. However, studies do not reveal how this audit cooperation affects stakeholder interests. Here, we introduce a stylised model to examine the effects of carbon audit cooperation on the environment, competing manufacturers, and their supplier. We identify two main effects: the free-riding and amplifying effects. The former benefits the supplier but harms the environment and competing manufacturers, while the latter presents the opposite effect. The net impact depends on the balance between these two effects, which challenges conventional beliefs about carbon emissions compliance and highlights the importance of sustainability in the industry. Finally, we explore various extensions to validate the robustness of our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
期刊最新文献
Can feature removal benefit the automotive manufacturers amid supply shortages? An analytical investigation Pre-occurrence location-allocation-configuration of maritime emergency resources considering shipborne unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Economically viable reshoring of supply chains under ripple effect The role of hubs and economies of scale in network expansion Evolutive multi-attribute decision making with online consumer reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1