针对中线巨大切口疝的组件分离疝成形术,前路与后路腹横肌松解术:前瞻性比较研究

Mahmoud Abdelhameid, Mohamed Abdelshafy, A. Taha
{"title":"针对中线巨大切口疝的组件分离疝成形术,前路与后路腹横肌松解术:前瞻性比较研究","authors":"Mahmoud Abdelhameid, Mohamed Abdelshafy, A. Taha","doi":"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". ABSTRACT Background: Component separation techniques are an integral step in the repair of incisional hernias with huge defects. Anterior component separation (ACS) and posterior component separation (PCS) with transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) are commonly utilized. Aim: To compare ACS with onlay hernioplasty versus PCS-TAR with retrorectus hernioplasty to treat huge defect incisional hernias. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective comparative study on 35 patients who underwent surgical repair for midline incisional hernias with defects more than 10 cm in width. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A included patients for ACS with onlay hernioplasty, and group B included patients for PCS-TAR with retrorectus hernioplasty. Surgeries were performed under general anesthesia and patients’ follow-up was done for up to 1 year. Demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected, tabulated, and analyzed by SPSS 26. Results: Group A included 18 patients, and group B included 17 patients. There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the preoperative variable. PCS-TAR had statistically significant longer operative time, fewer days of suction drainage, lower incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and seroma, and lower incidence of recurrence. Conclusion: In surgical repair of incisional hernias with huge defects, PCS-TAR had significantly lower wound morbidity and recurrence rates than the ACS.","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"37 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Component separation hernioplasty for huge defect midline incisional hernias, anterior versus posterior with transversus abdominis release: A prospective comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Abdelhameid, Mohamed Abdelshafy, A. Taha\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". ABSTRACT Background: Component separation techniques are an integral step in the repair of incisional hernias with huge defects. Anterior component separation (ACS) and posterior component separation (PCS) with transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) are commonly utilized. Aim: To compare ACS with onlay hernioplasty versus PCS-TAR with retrorectus hernioplasty to treat huge defect incisional hernias. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective comparative study on 35 patients who underwent surgical repair for midline incisional hernias with defects more than 10 cm in width. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A included patients for ACS with onlay hernioplasty, and group B included patients for PCS-TAR with retrorectus hernioplasty. Surgeries were performed under general anesthesia and patients’ follow-up was done for up to 1 year. Demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected, tabulated, and analyzed by SPSS 26. Results: Group A included 18 patients, and group B included 17 patients. There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the preoperative variable. PCS-TAR had statistically significant longer operative time, fewer days of suction drainage, lower incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and seroma, and lower incidence of recurrence. Conclusion: In surgical repair of incisional hernias with huge defects, PCS-TAR had significantly lower wound morbidity and recurrence rates than the ACS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"37 S1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

.摘要 背景:组件分离技术是修复巨大缺损切口疝不可或缺的步骤。目前常用的是前部组件分离(ACS)和后部组件分离(PCS)加腹横肌松解术(TAR)。目的:在治疗巨大缺损切口疝时,比较 ACS 与嵌顿疝成形术和 PCS-TAR 与后直肌疝成形术。患者和方法:这是一项前瞻性比较研究,35 名患者因中线切口疝而接受手术修复,缺损宽度超过 10 厘米。患者被随机分为两组。A 组包括采用嵌顿疝成形术的 ACS 患者,B 组包括采用后直肌疝成形术的 PCS-TAR 患者。手术在全身麻醉下进行,对患者进行长达一年的随访。采用 SPSS 26 对人口统计学、围手术期和随访数据进行收集、制表和分析。结果A 组包括 18 名患者,B 组包括 17 名患者。两组在术前变量方面没有统计学差异。PCS-TAR的手术时间更长,抽吸引流天数更少,手术部位感染(SSI)和血清肿的发生率更低,复发率更低,这些都具有统计学意义。结论在对巨大缺损的切口疝进行手术修复时,PCS-TAR 的伤口发病率和复发率明显低于 ACS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Component separation hernioplasty for huge defect midline incisional hernias, anterior versus posterior with transversus abdominis release: A prospective comparative study
. ABSTRACT Background: Component separation techniques are an integral step in the repair of incisional hernias with huge defects. Anterior component separation (ACS) and posterior component separation (PCS) with transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) are commonly utilized. Aim: To compare ACS with onlay hernioplasty versus PCS-TAR with retrorectus hernioplasty to treat huge defect incisional hernias. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective comparative study on 35 patients who underwent surgical repair for midline incisional hernias with defects more than 10 cm in width. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A included patients for ACS with onlay hernioplasty, and group B included patients for PCS-TAR with retrorectus hernioplasty. Surgeries were performed under general anesthesia and patients’ follow-up was done for up to 1 year. Demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected, tabulated, and analyzed by SPSS 26. Results: Group A included 18 patients, and group B included 17 patients. There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the preoperative variable. PCS-TAR had statistically significant longer operative time, fewer days of suction drainage, lower incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and seroma, and lower incidence of recurrence. Conclusion: In surgical repair of incisional hernias with huge defects, PCS-TAR had significantly lower wound morbidity and recurrence rates than the ACS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the value of core biopsy for establishing tissue diagnosis compared to excisional biopsy in enlarged cervical lymph nodes Fibrin glue versus sutures for mesh fixation in open repair of inguinal hernia Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura Correlating preoperative clinicopathological factors with skin and/ or nipple–areola complex tumor involvement in postmastectomy specimens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1