逻辑后果（轻微回归）

Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/arisup/akae012

Gillian Russell

{"title":"逻辑后果（轻微回归）","authors":"Gillian Russell","doi":"10.1093/arisup/akae012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper I ask what logical consequence is, and give an answer that is somewhat different from the usual ones. It isn’t clear why anyone would need a new approach to logical consequence, so I begin by explaining the work that I need the answer to do and why the standard conceptions aren’t adequate. Then I articulate a replacement view which is.","PeriodicalId":100121,"journal":{"name":"Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logical Consequence (Slight Return)\",\"authors\":\"Gillian Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arisup/akae012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this paper I ask what logical consequence is, and give an answer that is somewhat different from the usual ones. It isn’t clear why anyone would need a new approach to logical consequence, so I begin by explaining the work that I need the answer to do and why the standard conceptions aren’t adequate. Then I articulate a replacement view which is.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akae012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akae012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中，我提出了 "逻辑结果 "是什么的问题，并给出了一个与通常答案有些不同的答案。目前还不清楚为什么有人需要一种新的逻辑后果方法，所以我首先解释了我需要答案来做的工作，以及为什么标准概念不够充分。然后，我阐述了一种替代观点，即：

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Logical Consequence (Slight Return)

In this paper I ask what logical consequence is, and give an answer that is somewhat different from the usual ones. It isn’t clear why anyone would need a new approach to logical consequence, so I begin by explaining the work that I need the answer to do and why the standard conceptions aren’t adequate. Then I articulate a replacement view which is.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Pluralist Republicanism: Race, Gender and Domination Horkheimer, Habermas, Foucault as Political Epistemologists Metaethics and the Nature of Properties Liberation Philosophy Logical Consequence (Slight Return)