罗瓦霍和熊去氧胆酸对预防腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛的影响

Ahmed M. Elashry, Hossam A. Elfeki, Amir A. Eldawody, Hesham M. El-Gendy
{"title":"罗瓦霍和熊去氧胆酸对预防腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛的影响","authors":"Ahmed M. Elashry, Hossam A. Elfeki, Amir A. Eldawody, Hesham M. El-Gendy","doi":"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients often experience various symptoms from the immediate postoperative period to even years after. Rowachol is a terpene mixture that enhances the solubility of cholesterol, calcium carbonate, and calcium phosphate, which makes it a potent choleretic agent. Ursodeoxycholic acid can improve gallbladder contractility by decreasing cholesterol content in the plasma membrane of muscle cells and can stimulate biliary secretion, leading to relieved cholestasis. Aim: To determine whether Rowachol and ursodeoxycholic acid were useful in the prevention of postcholecystectomy pain. Patients and Methods: This randomized, clinical trial included 225 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were randomly distributed into three groups according to the type of interventions. Group A included 75 patients who received Rowachol at a dose of 100 mg three times daily for 3 months; group B included 75 patients who received ursodeoxycholic acid at a dose of 300 mg twice daily for 3 months, and the control group included 75 patients who did not receive any. Technical difficulties were assessed also using the Parkland grading scale, which assesses the initial view of the gallbladder. Postoperatively, the patients were assessed by biliary pain score. Results: A higher percentage of patients in groups A and B had a Parkland score of more than II (21.3; 16%) compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the studied groups as regards postoperative complication incidence or postoperative pain grade. Mean Parkland grading was higher among intervention groups than the control group with a statistically significant difference. A higher percentage of patients in intervention groups experienced grades III and IV postoperative pain than the control group with a statistically significant difference. Mean values for postoperative pain grade were higher among the intervention group than the control group with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: In conclusion, both Rowachol and ursodeoxycholic acid did not have a significant effect on postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy pain incidence","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"22 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Rowachol and ursodeoxycholic acid in the prevention of postcholecystectomy pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed M. Elashry, Hossam A. Elfeki, Amir A. Eldawody, Hesham M. El-Gendy\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Patients often experience various symptoms from the immediate postoperative period to even years after. Rowachol is a terpene mixture that enhances the solubility of cholesterol, calcium carbonate, and calcium phosphate, which makes it a potent choleretic agent. Ursodeoxycholic acid can improve gallbladder contractility by decreasing cholesterol content in the plasma membrane of muscle cells and can stimulate biliary secretion, leading to relieved cholestasis. Aim: To determine whether Rowachol and ursodeoxycholic acid were useful in the prevention of postcholecystectomy pain. Patients and Methods: This randomized, clinical trial included 225 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were randomly distributed into three groups according to the type of interventions. Group A included 75 patients who received Rowachol at a dose of 100 mg three times daily for 3 months; group B included 75 patients who received ursodeoxycholic acid at a dose of 300 mg twice daily for 3 months, and the control group included 75 patients who did not receive any. Technical difficulties were assessed also using the Parkland grading scale, which assesses the initial view of the gallbladder. Postoperatively, the patients were assessed by biliary pain score. Results: A higher percentage of patients in groups A and B had a Parkland score of more than II (21.3; 16%) compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the studied groups as regards postoperative complication incidence or postoperative pain grade. Mean Parkland grading was higher among intervention groups than the control group with a statistically significant difference. A higher percentage of patients in intervention groups experienced grades III and IV postoperative pain than the control group with a statistically significant difference. Mean values for postoperative pain grade were higher among the intervention group than the control group with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: In conclusion, both Rowachol and ursodeoxycholic acid did not have a significant effect on postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy pain incidence\",\"PeriodicalId\":22550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"22 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从术后初期到数年后,患者经常会出现各种症状。罗瓦乔尔是一种萜烯混合物,能增强胆固醇、碳酸钙和磷酸钙的溶解度,因此是一种强效利胆剂。熊去氧胆酸可通过降低胆囊肌细胞质膜中的胆固醇含量来改善胆囊收缩力,并能刺激胆汁分泌,从而缓解胆汁淤积。目的:确定络活喜和熊去氧胆酸是否有助于预防胆囊切除术后疼痛。患者和方法:这项随机临床试验包括 225 名接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者,根据干预类型随机分为三组。A 组包括 75 名接受罗伐乔尔治疗的患者,剂量为 100 毫克,每天三次,为期 3 个月;B 组包括 75 名接受熊去氧胆酸治疗的患者,剂量为 300 毫克,每天两次,为期 3 个月;对照组包括 75 名未接受任何治疗的患者。技术难度的评估也采用帕克兰分级表,该分级表评估胆囊的初始视图。术后对患者进行胆道疼痛评分。结果:与对照组相比,A 组和 B 组中 Parkland 评分超过 II 级的患者比例更高(21.3%;16%)。在术后并发症发生率和术后疼痛分级方面,研究组之间没有明显的统计学差异。干预组的平均帕克兰评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义。干预组术后出现 III 级和 IV 级疼痛的患者比例高于对照组,差异有统计学意义。干预组术后疼痛等级的平均值高于对照组,差异有统计学意义。结论总之,罗瓦霍和熊去氧胆酸对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛的发生率没有明显影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Rowachol and ursodeoxycholic acid in the prevention of postcholecystectomy pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Background: Patients often experience various symptoms from the immediate postoperative period to even years after. Rowachol is a terpene mixture that enhances the solubility of cholesterol, calcium carbonate, and calcium phosphate, which makes it a potent choleretic agent. Ursodeoxycholic acid can improve gallbladder contractility by decreasing cholesterol content in the plasma membrane of muscle cells and can stimulate biliary secretion, leading to relieved cholestasis. Aim: To determine whether Rowachol and ursodeoxycholic acid were useful in the prevention of postcholecystectomy pain. Patients and Methods: This randomized, clinical trial included 225 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were randomly distributed into three groups according to the type of interventions. Group A included 75 patients who received Rowachol at a dose of 100 mg three times daily for 3 months; group B included 75 patients who received ursodeoxycholic acid at a dose of 300 mg twice daily for 3 months, and the control group included 75 patients who did not receive any. Technical difficulties were assessed also using the Parkland grading scale, which assesses the initial view of the gallbladder. Postoperatively, the patients were assessed by biliary pain score. Results: A higher percentage of patients in groups A and B had a Parkland score of more than II (21.3; 16%) compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the studied groups as regards postoperative complication incidence or postoperative pain grade. Mean Parkland grading was higher among intervention groups than the control group with a statistically significant difference. A higher percentage of patients in intervention groups experienced grades III and IV postoperative pain than the control group with a statistically significant difference. Mean values for postoperative pain grade were higher among the intervention group than the control group with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: In conclusion, both Rowachol and ursodeoxycholic acid did not have a significant effect on postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy pain incidence
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the value of core biopsy for establishing tissue diagnosis compared to excisional biopsy in enlarged cervical lymph nodes Fibrin glue versus sutures for mesh fixation in open repair of inguinal hernia Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura Correlating preoperative clinicopathological factors with skin and/ or nipple–areola complex tumor involvement in postmastectomy specimens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1