R Douglas Macmillan, Kara Bell, Emma Wilson, Kristjan S Asgeirsson
{"title":"侧椎体乳突切除术","authors":"R Douglas Macmillan, Kara Bell, Emma Wilson, Kristjan S Asgeirsson","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although breast explantation combined with mastopexy is an increasingly common procedure, it does present certain technical difficulties. The authors present a technique of explantation mastopexy with the use of an extended lateral pedicle for autoaugmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of 40 cases was reviewed retrospectively, with a patient-reported outcome questionnaire and photography at 3 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 57 years (range, 40 to 70 years), and the mean duration of implantation was 20.4 years (range, 7 to 42 years). Twelve women had undergone previous mastopexy (30%). Minor wound complications requiring simple dressings were seen in 7 patients (17.5%). Major infected wound problems occurred in 1 patient, who was a smoker and had other comorbidities. All except 1 patient reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome, with a mean patient-reported satisfaction score of 4.9 of 5. When the photographs were independently assessed by a cosmetic practitioner, all patients were rated as average, good, or very good, with a mean score of 4.1 of 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The procedure is associated with low risk of postoperative complications, good cosmetic outcomes, and a high degree of patient satisfaction. The authors believe this technique provides a logical, reproducible method for combined explantation and mastopexy.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"269-278"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explantation with Lateral Pedicle Mastopexy.\",\"authors\":\"R Douglas Macmillan, Kara Bell, Emma Wilson, Kristjan S Asgeirsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although breast explantation combined with mastopexy is an increasingly common procedure, it does present certain technical difficulties. The authors present a technique of explantation mastopexy with the use of an extended lateral pedicle for autoaugmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive series of 40 cases was reviewed retrospectively, with a patient-reported outcome questionnaire and photography at 3 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 57 years (range, 40 to 70 years), and the mean duration of implantation was 20.4 years (range, 7 to 42 years). Twelve women had undergone previous mastopexy (30%). Minor wound complications requiring simple dressings were seen in 7 patients (17.5%). Major infected wound problems occurred in 1 patient, who was a smoker and had other comorbidities. All except 1 patient reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome, with a mean patient-reported satisfaction score of 4.9 of 5. When the photographs were independently assessed by a cosmetic practitioner, all patients were rated as average, good, or very good, with a mean score of 4.1 of 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The procedure is associated with low risk of postoperative complications, good cosmetic outcomes, and a high degree of patient satisfaction. The authors believe this technique provides a logical, reproducible method for combined explantation and mastopexy.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"269-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011645\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Although breast explantation combined with mastopexy is an increasingly common procedure, it does present certain technical difficulties. The authors present a technique of explantation mastopexy with the use of an extended lateral pedicle for autoaugmentation.
Methods: A consecutive series of 40 cases was reviewed retrospectively, with a patient-reported outcome questionnaire and photography at 3 and 12 months.
Results: The mean patient age was 57 years (range, 40 to 70 years), and the mean duration of implantation was 20.4 years (range, 7 to 42 years). Twelve women had undergone previous mastopexy (30%). Minor wound complications requiring simple dressings were seen in 7 patients (17.5%). Major infected wound problems occurred in 1 patient, who was a smoker and had other comorbidities. All except 1 patient reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome, with a mean patient-reported satisfaction score of 4.9 of 5. When the photographs were independently assessed by a cosmetic practitioner, all patients were rated as average, good, or very good, with a mean score of 4.1 of 5.
Conclusions: The procedure is associated with low risk of postoperative complications, good cosmetic outcomes, and a high degree of patient satisfaction. The authors believe this technique provides a logical, reproducible method for combined explantation and mastopexy.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.