{"title":"正常和阵风条件下风力涡轮机控制方法的比较分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper provides a thorough evaluation of well-known control algorithms, including proportional–integral (PI), model predictive control (MPC), and H-infinity (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>∞</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) controllers, by implementing them in a full nonlinear wind turbine model under normal wind conditions in below and above-rated wind speeds. The simulation results show that all the controllers perform satisfactorily. This study extends MPC to include a feedforward (FF) loop (FF-MPC) that uses the wind speed information provided by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor, which measures the upcoming wind (in advance), to improve the overall control performance. The FF-MPC was tested under both normal and anomalous (<em>i.e.</em> gusty) wind conditions. The results were compared with those of the standard feedback MPC (FB-MPC). The results show that the incorporation of the FF loop into the standard FB controller can improve the control performance, which can result in improved reliability and lifespan of the turbine. Furthermore, MPC was augmented with an FF loop over PI and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>∞</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> controllers owing to its versatility in handling constraints, nonlinearities, and multiple objectives, along with its inherent capability to incorporate preview wind data. All the controllers are tested using a high-fidelity aeroelastic model (<em>i.e.</em> Bladed by DNV). The use of a Bladed model is common in wind turbine controller design before the application to the real-life wind turbine, and Bladed also allows more realistic simulation when incorporating a LiDAR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of control methods for a wind turbine in normal and gusty conditions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper provides a thorough evaluation of well-known control algorithms, including proportional–integral (PI), model predictive control (MPC), and H-infinity (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>∞</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) controllers, by implementing them in a full nonlinear wind turbine model under normal wind conditions in below and above-rated wind speeds. The simulation results show that all the controllers perform satisfactorily. This study extends MPC to include a feedforward (FF) loop (FF-MPC) that uses the wind speed information provided by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor, which measures the upcoming wind (in advance), to improve the overall control performance. The FF-MPC was tested under both normal and anomalous (<em>i.e.</em> gusty) wind conditions. The results were compared with those of the standard feedback MPC (FB-MPC). The results show that the incorporation of the FF loop into the standard FB controller can improve the control performance, which can result in improved reliability and lifespan of the turbine. Furthermore, MPC was augmented with an FF loop over PI and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>∞</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> controllers owing to its versatility in handling constraints, nonlinearities, and multiple objectives, along with its inherent capability to incorporate preview wind data. All the controllers are tested using a high-fidelity aeroelastic model (<em>i.e.</em> Bladed by DNV). The use of a Bladed model is common in wind turbine controller design before the application to the real-life wind turbine, and Bladed also allows more realistic simulation when incorporating a LiDAR.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096706612400176X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096706612400176X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of control methods for a wind turbine in normal and gusty conditions
This paper provides a thorough evaluation of well-known control algorithms, including proportional–integral (PI), model predictive control (MPC), and H-infinity () controllers, by implementing them in a full nonlinear wind turbine model under normal wind conditions in below and above-rated wind speeds. The simulation results show that all the controllers perform satisfactorily. This study extends MPC to include a feedforward (FF) loop (FF-MPC) that uses the wind speed information provided by a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor, which measures the upcoming wind (in advance), to improve the overall control performance. The FF-MPC was tested under both normal and anomalous (i.e. gusty) wind conditions. The results were compared with those of the standard feedback MPC (FB-MPC). The results show that the incorporation of the FF loop into the standard FB controller can improve the control performance, which can result in improved reliability and lifespan of the turbine. Furthermore, MPC was augmented with an FF loop over PI and controllers owing to its versatility in handling constraints, nonlinearities, and multiple objectives, along with its inherent capability to incorporate preview wind data. All the controllers are tested using a high-fidelity aeroelastic model (i.e. Bladed by DNV). The use of a Bladed model is common in wind turbine controller design before the application to the real-life wind turbine, and Bladed also allows more realistic simulation when incorporating a LiDAR.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.