Rezgar Shakeri, Leila Ghaffari, Jeremy L. Thompson, Jed Brown
{"title":"有限应变弹性的稳定数值计算","authors":"Rezgar Shakeri, Leila Ghaffari, Jeremy L. Thompson, Jed Brown","doi":"10.1002/nme.7563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A backward stable numerical calculation of a function with condition number <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>κ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\kappa $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> will have a relative accuracy of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>κ</mi>\n <msub>\n <mrow>\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mtext>machine</mtext>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\kappa {\\epsilon}_{\\mathrm{machine}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. Standard formulations and software implementations of finite-strain elastic materials models make use of the deformation gradient <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mi>I</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mi>∂</mi>\n <mi>u</mi>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mi>∂</mi>\n <mi>X</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\boldsymbol{F}=I+\\partial \\boldsymbol{u}/\\partial \\boldsymbol{X} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and Cauchy-Green tensors. These formulations are not numerically stable, leading to loss of several digits of accuracy when used in the small strain regime, and often precluding the use of single precision floating point arithmetic. We trace the source of this instability to specific points of numerical cancellation, interpretable as ill-conditioned steps. We show how to compute various strain measures in a stable way and how to transform common constitutive models to their stable representations, formulated in either initial or current configuration. The stable formulations all provide accuracy of order <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mrow>\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mtext>machine</mtext>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\epsilon}_{\\mathrm{machine}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. In many cases, the stable formulations have elegant representations in terms of appropriate strain measures and offer geometric intuition that is lacking in their standard representation. We show that algorithmic differentiation can stably compute stresses so long as the strain energy is expressed stably, and give principles for stable computation that can be applied to inelastic materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":13699,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stable numerics for finite-strain elasticity\",\"authors\":\"Rezgar Shakeri, Leila Ghaffari, Jeremy L. Thompson, Jed Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nme.7563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A backward stable numerical calculation of a function with condition number <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>κ</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\kappa $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> will have a relative accuracy of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>κ</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mtext>machine</mtext>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\kappa {\\\\epsilon}_{\\\\mathrm{machine}} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. Standard formulations and software implementations of finite-strain elastic materials models make use of the deformation gradient <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>F</mi>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mi>I</mi>\\n <mo>+</mo>\\n <mi>∂</mi>\\n <mi>u</mi>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <mi>∂</mi>\\n <mi>X</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\boldsymbol{F}=I+\\\\partial \\\\boldsymbol{u}/\\\\partial \\\\boldsymbol{X} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and Cauchy-Green tensors. These formulations are not numerically stable, leading to loss of several digits of accuracy when used in the small strain regime, and often precluding the use of single precision floating point arithmetic. We trace the source of this instability to specific points of numerical cancellation, interpretable as ill-conditioned steps. We show how to compute various strain measures in a stable way and how to transform common constitutive models to their stable representations, formulated in either initial or current configuration. The stable formulations all provide accuracy of order <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>ϵ</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mtext>machine</mtext>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {\\\\epsilon}_{\\\\mathrm{machine}} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. In many cases, the stable formulations have elegant representations in terms of appropriate strain measures and offer geometric intuition that is lacking in their standard representation. We show that algorithmic differentiation can stably compute stresses so long as the strain energy is expressed stably, and give principles for stable computation that can be applied to inelastic materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nme.7563\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nme.7563","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A backward stable numerical calculation of a function with condition number will have a relative accuracy of . Standard formulations and software implementations of finite-strain elastic materials models make use of the deformation gradient and Cauchy-Green tensors. These formulations are not numerically stable, leading to loss of several digits of accuracy when used in the small strain regime, and often precluding the use of single precision floating point arithmetic. We trace the source of this instability to specific points of numerical cancellation, interpretable as ill-conditioned steps. We show how to compute various strain measures in a stable way and how to transform common constitutive models to their stable representations, formulated in either initial or current configuration. The stable formulations all provide accuracy of order . In many cases, the stable formulations have elegant representations in terms of appropriate strain measures and offer geometric intuition that is lacking in their standard representation. We show that algorithmic differentiation can stably compute stresses so long as the strain energy is expressed stably, and give principles for stable computation that can be applied to inelastic materials.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering publishes original papers describing significant, novel developments in numerical methods that are applicable to engineering problems.
The Journal is known for welcoming contributions in a wide range of areas in computational engineering, including computational issues in model reduction, uncertainty quantification, verification and validation, inverse analysis and stochastic methods, optimisation, element technology, solution techniques and parallel computing, damage and fracture, mechanics at micro and nano-scales, low-speed fluid dynamics, fluid-structure interaction, electromagnetics, coupled diffusion phenomena, and error estimation and mesh generation. It is emphasized that this is by no means an exhaustive list, and particularly papers on multi-scale, multi-physics or multi-disciplinary problems, and on new, emerging topics are welcome.