结合业务流程管理和精益生产,改善信息和文件流程:案例研究

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Process Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1108/bpmj-10-2023-0773
Rodrigo Calçado, Liliana Ávila, Maria J. Rosa
{"title":"结合业务流程管理和精益生产,改善信息和文件流程:案例研究","authors":"Rodrigo Calçado, Liliana Ávila, Maria J. Rosa","doi":"10.1108/bpmj-10-2023-0773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The objective of this work is to demonstrate how the use of a business process management (BPM) methodology reinforced with the use of lean manufacturing (LM) tools and practices enhances information and documentation flows.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>For this purpose, a case study on a large wind blade manufacturing company is described, in which BPM and LM were combined to improve information and documentation flows associated to the process of quality inspections and quality controls.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The joint use of BPM and LM strongly contributed to the improvement of information and documentation flows. The BPM lifecycle can be used to guide the entire improvement process, while LM tools can be used to act at specific points with an emphasis in the process analysis and implementation phases. Thus, LM complements a BPM approach leading to significant process improvements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The results show that LM can be used to support some phases of the BPM lifecycle. Furthermore, LM can contribute to identify lean waste in information and documentation flows associated to quality management processes and help in the selection of methods and tools to support process improvements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study is one of the first reporting the use of LM tools and practices as complementary to the BPM methodology to support the improvement of information and documentation flows associated to quality management in a large manufacturing company. This research enriches the literature by presenting empirical evidence that these two continuous improvement approaches are not incompatible in their objectives and visions and can complement each other.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47964,"journal":{"name":"Business Process Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining business process management and lean manufacturing to improve information and documentation flows: a case study\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Calçado, Liliana Ávila, Maria J. Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bpmj-10-2023-0773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The objective of this work is to demonstrate how the use of a business process management (BPM) methodology reinforced with the use of lean manufacturing (LM) tools and practices enhances information and documentation flows.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>For this purpose, a case study on a large wind blade manufacturing company is described, in which BPM and LM were combined to improve information and documentation flows associated to the process of quality inspections and quality controls.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The joint use of BPM and LM strongly contributed to the improvement of information and documentation flows. The BPM lifecycle can be used to guide the entire improvement process, while LM tools can be used to act at specific points with an emphasis in the process analysis and implementation phases. Thus, LM complements a BPM approach leading to significant process improvements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The results show that LM can be used to support some phases of the BPM lifecycle. Furthermore, LM can contribute to identify lean waste in information and documentation flows associated to quality management processes and help in the selection of methods and tools to support process improvements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study is one of the first reporting the use of LM tools and practices as complementary to the BPM methodology to support the improvement of information and documentation flows associated to quality management in a large manufacturing company. This research enriches the literature by presenting empirical evidence that these two continuous improvement approaches are not incompatible in their objectives and visions and can complement each other.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-10-2023-0773\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Process Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-10-2023-0773","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计/方法/途径为此,我们对一家大型风力叶片制造公司进行了案例研究,将业务流程管理(BPM)与精益生产(LM)工具和实践相结合,改善了与质量检查和质量控制流程相关的信息和文件流程。BPM 生命周期可用于指导整个改进过程,而 LM 工具则可用于在特定点采取行动,重点是过程分析和实施阶段。结果表明,LM 可以用来支持 BPM 生命周期的某些阶段。此外,LM 还有助于识别与质量管理流程相关的信息流和文档流中的精益浪费,并有助于选择支持流程改进的方法和工具。原创性/价值本研究是首次报告使用 LM 工具和实践作为 BPM 方法的补充,以支持大型制造企业改进与质量管理相关的信息流和文档流。这项研究提供了经验证据,证明这两种持续改进方法在目标和愿景方面并非互不相容,而是可以相辅相成,从而丰富了相关文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combining business process management and lean manufacturing to improve information and documentation flows: a case study

Purpose

The objective of this work is to demonstrate how the use of a business process management (BPM) methodology reinforced with the use of lean manufacturing (LM) tools and practices enhances information and documentation flows.

Design/methodology/approach

For this purpose, a case study on a large wind blade manufacturing company is described, in which BPM and LM were combined to improve information and documentation flows associated to the process of quality inspections and quality controls.

Findings

The joint use of BPM and LM strongly contributed to the improvement of information and documentation flows. The BPM lifecycle can be used to guide the entire improvement process, while LM tools can be used to act at specific points with an emphasis in the process analysis and implementation phases. Thus, LM complements a BPM approach leading to significant process improvements.

Practical implications

The results show that LM can be used to support some phases of the BPM lifecycle. Furthermore, LM can contribute to identify lean waste in information and documentation flows associated to quality management processes and help in the selection of methods and tools to support process improvements.

Originality/value

This study is one of the first reporting the use of LM tools and practices as complementary to the BPM methodology to support the improvement of information and documentation flows associated to quality management in a large manufacturing company. This research enriches the literature by presenting empirical evidence that these two continuous improvement approaches are not incompatible in their objectives and visions and can complement each other.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Business processes are a fundamental building block of organizational success. Even though effectively managing business process is a key activity for business prosperity, there remain considerable gaps in understanding how to drive efficiency through a process approach. Building a clear and deep understanding of the range process, how they function, and how to manage them is the major challenge facing modern business. Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) examines how a variety of business processes intrinsic to organizational efficiency and effectiveness are integrated and managed for competitive success. BPMJ builds a deep appreciation of how to manage business processes effectively by disseminating best practice. Coverage includes: BPM in eBusiness, eCommerce and eGovernment Web-based enterprise application integration eBPM, ERP, CRM, ASP & SCM Knowledge management and learning organization Methodologies, techniques and tools of business process modeling, analysis and design Techniques of moving from one-shot business process re-engineering to continuous improvement Best practices in BPM Performance management Tools and techniques of change management BPM case studies.
期刊最新文献
A dynamic, two-way, individual-level, process-oriented framework for emergent leadership: modeling lateral influence in teams A dynamic, two-way, individual-level, process-oriented framework for emergent leadership: modeling lateral influence in teams Unpacking the black box between market culture and innovation performance: the role of absorptive capacity and resistance to change Mapping the risks in technology integration for sustainable outcomes Mapping the way to a dark green enterprise: fuzzy cognitive map based analysis of factors affecting environmental performance for sustainable development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1