Jenna Bhimani, Kelli O'Connell, Sonia Persaud, Victoria Blinder, Rachael P Burganowski-Doud, Isaac J Ergas, Grace B Gallagher, Jennifer J Griggs, Narre Heon, Tatjana Kolevska, Yuriy Kotsurovskyy, Candyce H Kroenke, Cecile A Laurent, Raymond Liu, Kanichi G Nakata, Donna R Rivera, Janise M Roh, Sara Tabatabai, Emily Valice, Elisa V Bandera, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Lawrence H Kushi, Elizabeth D Kantor
{"title":"与 I-IIIA 期乳腺癌女性患者非指南化疗相关的患者特征。","authors":"Jenna Bhimani, Kelli O'Connell, Sonia Persaud, Victoria Blinder, Rachael P Burganowski-Doud, Isaac J Ergas, Grace B Gallagher, Jennifer J Griggs, Narre Heon, Tatjana Kolevska, Yuriy Kotsurovskyy, Candyce H Kroenke, Cecile A Laurent, Raymond Liu, Kanichi G Nakata, Donna R Rivera, Janise M Roh, Sara Tabatabai, Emily Valice, Elisa V Bandera, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Lawrence H Kushi, Elizabeth D Kantor","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines informing chemotherapy regimen selection are based on clinical trials with participants who do not necessarily represent general populations with breast cancer. Understanding who receives nonguideline regimens is important for understanding real-world chemotherapy administration and how it relates to patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing (OBCD) study, based at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2006-2019) and Kaiser Permanente Washington (2004-2015), we use logistic regression to examine the associations between patient characteristics and receipt of nonguideline chemotherapy regimens among 11,293 women with primary stage I to IIIA breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of nonguideline regimens was strongly associated with several factors, including older age [≥80 vs. 18-39 years: OR, 5.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.06-9.00; P-trend = 0.002] and HER2 status (HER2+ vs. HER2-: OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 3.06-3.87) and was less likely in women with larger tumor size (>5 cm vs. 0.1 to ≤0.5 cm: OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87; P-trend = 0.01) and diagnosed in later years (2012-2019 vs. 2005-2011: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90). Factors associated varied by type of nonguideline regimens. For example, women with comorbidity and older age were more likely to receive nonguideline drug combinations in particular, whereas women with larger tumor size were less likely to receive nonguideline administration schedules.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonguideline chemotherapy regimens are more likely in certain patient populations.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>These associations highlight that vulnerable patient populations may be less likely to receive guideline care, and thus, real-world studies are essential for understanding how the use of nonguideline regimens impacts patient outcomes in these groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1286-1297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Characteristics Associated with Intended Nonguideline Chemotherapy in Women with Stage I to IIIA Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jenna Bhimani, Kelli O'Connell, Sonia Persaud, Victoria Blinder, Rachael P Burganowski-Doud, Isaac J Ergas, Grace B Gallagher, Jennifer J Griggs, Narre Heon, Tatjana Kolevska, Yuriy Kotsurovskyy, Candyce H Kroenke, Cecile A Laurent, Raymond Liu, Kanichi G Nakata, Donna R Rivera, Janise M Roh, Sara Tabatabai, Emily Valice, Elisa V Bandera, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Lawrence H Kushi, Elizabeth D Kantor\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines informing chemotherapy regimen selection are based on clinical trials with participants who do not necessarily represent general populations with breast cancer. Understanding who receives nonguideline regimens is important for understanding real-world chemotherapy administration and how it relates to patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing (OBCD) study, based at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2006-2019) and Kaiser Permanente Washington (2004-2015), we use logistic regression to examine the associations between patient characteristics and receipt of nonguideline chemotherapy regimens among 11,293 women with primary stage I to IIIA breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of nonguideline regimens was strongly associated with several factors, including older age [≥80 vs. 18-39 years: OR, 5.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.06-9.00; P-trend = 0.002] and HER2 status (HER2+ vs. HER2-: OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 3.06-3.87) and was less likely in women with larger tumor size (>5 cm vs. 0.1 to ≤0.5 cm: OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87; P-trend = 0.01) and diagnosed in later years (2012-2019 vs. 2005-2011: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90). Factors associated varied by type of nonguideline regimens. For example, women with comorbidity and older age were more likely to receive nonguideline drug combinations in particular, whereas women with larger tumor size were less likely to receive nonguideline administration schedules.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonguideline chemotherapy regimens are more likely in certain patient populations.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>These associations highlight that vulnerable patient populations may be less likely to receive guideline care, and thus, real-world studies are essential for understanding how the use of nonguideline regimens impacts patient outcomes in these groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1286-1297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0360\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:化疗方案选择指南以临床试验为基础,而临床试验的参与者并不一定代表乳腺癌患者的总体情况。了解哪些患者接受了非指南方案对于了解现实世界中的化疗管理及其与患者预后的关系非常重要:利用北加州凯泽医疗集团(Kaiser Permanente Northern California,2006-2019 年)和华盛顿凯泽医疗集团(Kaiser Permanente Washington,2004-2015 年)的最佳乳腺癌化疗剂量(Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing,OBCD)队列研究的数据,我们使用逻辑回归法研究了 11,293 名接受化疗的 I-IIIA 期原发性乳腺癌女性患者中,患者特征与接受非 NCCN 指南化疗之间的关联:结果:非指南方案的使用与几个因素密切相关,包括年龄较大(OR≥80 vs 18-39:5.25,95%CI:3.06-9.00)(p-trend=0.002)和人类表皮生长因子-2状态(ORHER2+ vs HER2-:3.44;95%CI:3.06-3.87),且肿瘤尺寸较大(OR>5cm vs 0.1-≤0.5cm:0.56;95%CI:0.36-0.87)(P-趋势=0.01)和确诊时间较晚(OR2012-2019 vs 2005-2011:0.80;95%CI:0.71-0.90)的女性患病几率较低。相关因素因非指南方案的类型而异。例如,患有合并症和年龄较大的女性接受非指南药物组合的可能性更大,而肿瘤体积较大的女性接受非指南给药方案的可能性较小:结论:某些患者更有可能接受非指南化疗方案:影响:这些关联凸显了弱势患者群体可能较少接受指南护理,因此真实世界研究对于了解非指南方案的使用如何影响这些群体的患者预后至关重要。
Patient Characteristics Associated with Intended Nonguideline Chemotherapy in Women with Stage I to IIIA Breast Cancer.
Background: Guidelines informing chemotherapy regimen selection are based on clinical trials with participants who do not necessarily represent general populations with breast cancer. Understanding who receives nonguideline regimens is important for understanding real-world chemotherapy administration and how it relates to patient outcomes.
Methods: Using data from the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing (OBCD) study, based at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2006-2019) and Kaiser Permanente Washington (2004-2015), we use logistic regression to examine the associations between patient characteristics and receipt of nonguideline chemotherapy regimens among 11,293 women with primary stage I to IIIA breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Results: The use of nonguideline regimens was strongly associated with several factors, including older age [≥80 vs. 18-39 years: OR, 5.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.06-9.00; P-trend = 0.002] and HER2 status (HER2+ vs. HER2-: OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 3.06-3.87) and was less likely in women with larger tumor size (>5 cm vs. 0.1 to ≤0.5 cm: OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87; P-trend = 0.01) and diagnosed in later years (2012-2019 vs. 2005-2011: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90). Factors associated varied by type of nonguideline regimens. For example, women with comorbidity and older age were more likely to receive nonguideline drug combinations in particular, whereas women with larger tumor size were less likely to receive nonguideline administration schedules.
Conclusions: Nonguideline chemotherapy regimens are more likely in certain patient populations.
Impact: These associations highlight that vulnerable patient populations may be less likely to receive guideline care, and thus, real-world studies are essential for understanding how the use of nonguideline regimens impacts patient outcomes in these groups.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.