人口和临床因素对急性缺血性脑卒中院内治疗延迟的影响。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1177/15910199241264326
Jonathan Naftali, Gal Tsur, Eitan Auriel, Guy Raphaeli, Michael Findler, Ran Brauner, Alain Perlow, Ophir Keret, Rani Barnea
{"title":"人口和临床因素对急性缺血性脑卒中院内治疗延迟的影响。","authors":"Jonathan Naftali, Gal Tsur, Eitan Auriel, Guy Raphaeli, Michael Findler, Ran Brauner, Alain Perlow, Ophir Keret, Rani Barnea","doi":"10.1177/15910199241264326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delays in reperfusion treatment, both intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT), adversely affect outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To alleviate these delays, it is essential to comprehend how patients' baseline and stroke characteristics impact in-hospital reperfusion delays. While demographic and socioeconomic factors affect stroke outcomes, their impact on in-hospital delays remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is retrospective analysis at a tertiary stroke center, encompassing AIS patients receiving IVT and / or EVT between 2019 and 2022 (re-canalization cohort). Outcomes of interest were time intervals of admission to CT and admission to recanalization. Univariable analyses explored age, gender, baseline functional status, socioeconomic status (SES), ethnicity, vascular risk factors, and stroke characteristics. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 313 patients treated with IVT and 293 with EVT were included in the re-canalization cohort. No demographic variables were found to be associated with stroke treatment time intervals. Following multivariable analysis, stroke severity (low NIHSS, <i>p</i> < 0.01), arrival to the hospital by other means than ambulance (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and atypical stroke symptoms (<i>p</i> < 0.01), were associated with in-hospital delays, both in the EVT and the IVT groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that patients with a more severe ischemic stroke, typical stroke symptoms, and arrival by ambulance have shorter stroke treatment time intervals. These results emphasize that, in atypical cases, even a lower suspicion of stroke should promote urgent workup for stroke diagnosis. Our findings do not indicate any influence of demographic or SES on in-hospital reperfusion delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241264326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of demographic and clinical factors on in-hospital delays in acute ischemic stroke treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Naftali, Gal Tsur, Eitan Auriel, Guy Raphaeli, Michael Findler, Ran Brauner, Alain Perlow, Ophir Keret, Rani Barnea\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241264326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delays in reperfusion treatment, both intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT), adversely affect outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To alleviate these delays, it is essential to comprehend how patients' baseline and stroke characteristics impact in-hospital reperfusion delays. While demographic and socioeconomic factors affect stroke outcomes, their impact on in-hospital delays remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is retrospective analysis at a tertiary stroke center, encompassing AIS patients receiving IVT and / or EVT between 2019 and 2022 (re-canalization cohort). Outcomes of interest were time intervals of admission to CT and admission to recanalization. Univariable analyses explored age, gender, baseline functional status, socioeconomic status (SES), ethnicity, vascular risk factors, and stroke characteristics. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 313 patients treated with IVT and 293 with EVT were included in the re-canalization cohort. No demographic variables were found to be associated with stroke treatment time intervals. Following multivariable analysis, stroke severity (low NIHSS, <i>p</i> < 0.01), arrival to the hospital by other means than ambulance (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and atypical stroke symptoms (<i>p</i> < 0.01), were associated with in-hospital delays, both in the EVT and the IVT groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that patients with a more severe ischemic stroke, typical stroke symptoms, and arrival by ambulance have shorter stroke treatment time intervals. These results emphasize that, in atypical cases, even a lower suspicion of stroke should promote urgent workup for stroke diagnosis. Our findings do not indicate any influence of demographic or SES on in-hospital reperfusion delays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199241264326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571707/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241264326\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241264326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:再灌注治疗(静脉溶栓(IVT)和血管内治疗(EVT))的延迟对急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的预后产生不利影响。为了缓解这些延误,了解患者的基线和卒中特征如何影响院内再灌注的延误至关重要。虽然人口和社会经济因素会影响卒中预后,但它们对院内延误的影响仍不清楚:这是一项在三级卒中中心进行的回顾性分析,涵盖了在2019年至2022年期间接受IVT和/或EVT的AIS患者(再灌注队列)。相关结果为入院至 CT 和入院至再通的时间间隔。单变量分析探讨了年龄、性别、基线功能状态、社会经济地位(SES)、种族、血管风险因素和卒中特征。随后进行了多变量逻辑回归分析:结果:共有313名接受IVT治疗的患者和293名接受EVT治疗的患者被纳入再闭塞队列。没有发现人口统计学变量与中风治疗时间间隔相关。经过多变量分析,卒中严重程度(低 NIHSS,p p p p 结论:我们的研究结果表明,缺血性卒中较严重、卒中症状典型且乘救护车到达的患者卒中治疗时间间隔较短。这些结果表明,对于非典型病例,即使对卒中的怀疑程度较低,也应尽快进行卒中诊断。我们的研究结果并未表明人口统计学或社会经济地位对院内再灌注延迟有任何影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of demographic and clinical factors on in-hospital delays in acute ischemic stroke treatment.

Background: Delays in reperfusion treatment, both intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT), adversely affect outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). To alleviate these delays, it is essential to comprehend how patients' baseline and stroke characteristics impact in-hospital reperfusion delays. While demographic and socioeconomic factors affect stroke outcomes, their impact on in-hospital delays remains unclear.

Method: This is retrospective analysis at a tertiary stroke center, encompassing AIS patients receiving IVT and / or EVT between 2019 and 2022 (re-canalization cohort). Outcomes of interest were time intervals of admission to CT and admission to recanalization. Univariable analyses explored age, gender, baseline functional status, socioeconomic status (SES), ethnicity, vascular risk factors, and stroke characteristics. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results: Altogether, 313 patients treated with IVT and 293 with EVT were included in the re-canalization cohort. No demographic variables were found to be associated with stroke treatment time intervals. Following multivariable analysis, stroke severity (low NIHSS, p < 0.01), arrival to the hospital by other means than ambulance (p < 0.01), and atypical stroke symptoms (p < 0.01), were associated with in-hospital delays, both in the EVT and the IVT groups.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that patients with a more severe ischemic stroke, typical stroke symptoms, and arrival by ambulance have shorter stroke treatment time intervals. These results emphasize that, in atypical cases, even a lower suspicion of stroke should promote urgent workup for stroke diagnosis. Our findings do not indicate any influence of demographic or SES on in-hospital reperfusion delays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Circulating miRNA profiles as predictive biomarkers for aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment: a prospective study. "Chopperlysis": The effect of helicopter transport on reperfusion and outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes. DWI lesions after intracranial aneurysm treatment with contour or WEB-does the device matter? Analysis of selective neurocritical care admission costs following elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Recognition of dural to pial supply in high-grade dural arteriovenous fistula: A technical note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1