主动脉夹层血流动力学分析中缩放入口血流波形的新方法。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1002/cnm.3855
Kaihong Wang, Chlöe H. Armour, Baolei Guo, Zhihui Dong, Xiao Yun Xu
{"title":"主动脉夹层血流动力学分析中缩放入口血流波形的新方法。","authors":"Kaihong Wang,&nbsp;Chlöe H. Armour,&nbsp;Baolei Guo,&nbsp;Zhihui Dong,&nbsp;Xiao Yun Xu","doi":"10.1002/cnm.3855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have shown great potentials in cardiovascular disease diagnosis and postoperative assessment. Patient-specific and well-tuned boundary conditions are key to obtaining accurate and reliable hemodynamic results. However, CFD simulations are usually performed under non-patient-specific flow conditions due to the absence of in vivo flow and pressure measurements. This study proposes a new method to overcome this challenge by tuning inlet boundary conditions using data extracted from electrocardiogram (ECG). Five patient-specific geometric models of type B aortic dissection were reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images. Other available data included stoke volume (SV), ECG, and 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ECG waveforms were processed to extract patient-specific systole to diastole ratio (SDR). Inlet boundary conditions were defined based on a generic aortic flow waveform tuned using (1) SV only, and (2) with ECG and SV (ECG + SV). 4D-flow MRI derived inlet boundary conditions were also used in patient-specific simulations to provide the gold standard for comparison and validation. Simulations using inlet flow waveform tuned with ECG + SV not only successfully reproduced flow distributions in the descending aorta but also provided accurate prediction of time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) in the primary entry tear (PET) and abdominal regions, as well as maximum pressure difference, <i>∆P</i><sub>max</sub>, from the aortic root to the distal false lumen. Compared with simulations with inlet waveform tuned with SV alone, using ECG + SV in the tuning method significantly reduced the error in false lumen ejection fraction at the PET (from 149.1% to 6.2%), reduced errors in TAWSS at the PET (from 54.1% to 5.7%) and in the abdominal region (from 61.3% to 11.1%), and improved <i>∆P</i><sub>max</sub> prediction (from 283.1% to 18.8%) However, neither of these inlet waveforms could be used for accurate prediction of TAWSS in the ascending aorta. This study demonstrates the importance of SDR in tailoring inlet flow waveforms for patient-specific hemodynamic simulations. A well-tuned flow waveform is essential for ensuring that the simulation results are patient-specific, thereby enhancing the confidence and fidelity of computational tools in future clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnm.3855","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new method for scaling inlet flow waveform in hemodynamic analysis of aortic dissection\",\"authors\":\"Kaihong Wang,&nbsp;Chlöe H. Armour,&nbsp;Baolei Guo,&nbsp;Zhihui Dong,&nbsp;Xiao Yun Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnm.3855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have shown great potentials in cardiovascular disease diagnosis and postoperative assessment. Patient-specific and well-tuned boundary conditions are key to obtaining accurate and reliable hemodynamic results. However, CFD simulations are usually performed under non-patient-specific flow conditions due to the absence of in vivo flow and pressure measurements. This study proposes a new method to overcome this challenge by tuning inlet boundary conditions using data extracted from electrocardiogram (ECG). Five patient-specific geometric models of type B aortic dissection were reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images. Other available data included stoke volume (SV), ECG, and 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ECG waveforms were processed to extract patient-specific systole to diastole ratio (SDR). Inlet boundary conditions were defined based on a generic aortic flow waveform tuned using (1) SV only, and (2) with ECG and SV (ECG + SV). 4D-flow MRI derived inlet boundary conditions were also used in patient-specific simulations to provide the gold standard for comparison and validation. Simulations using inlet flow waveform tuned with ECG + SV not only successfully reproduced flow distributions in the descending aorta but also provided accurate prediction of time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) in the primary entry tear (PET) and abdominal regions, as well as maximum pressure difference, <i>∆P</i><sub>max</sub>, from the aortic root to the distal false lumen. Compared with simulations with inlet waveform tuned with SV alone, using ECG + SV in the tuning method significantly reduced the error in false lumen ejection fraction at the PET (from 149.1% to 6.2%), reduced errors in TAWSS at the PET (from 54.1% to 5.7%) and in the abdominal region (from 61.3% to 11.1%), and improved <i>∆P</i><sub>max</sub> prediction (from 283.1% to 18.8%) However, neither of these inlet waveforms could be used for accurate prediction of TAWSS in the ascending aorta. This study demonstrates the importance of SDR in tailoring inlet flow waveforms for patient-specific hemodynamic simulations. A well-tuned flow waveform is essential for ensuring that the simulation results are patient-specific, thereby enhancing the confidence and fidelity of computational tools in future clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnm.3855\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.3855\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.3855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟在心血管疾病诊断和术后评估方面显示出巨大潜力。要获得准确可靠的血液动力学结果,关键在于针对特定患者的、经过良好调整的边界条件。然而,由于缺乏体内流量和压力测量,CFD 模拟通常是在非患者特异性流动条件下进行的。本研究提出了一种新方法,利用从心电图(ECG)中提取的数据调整入口边界条件,从而克服这一挑战。研究人员根据计算机断层扫描(CT)图像重建了五个特定于患者的 B 型主动脉夹层几何模型。其他可用数据包括梗塞容积 (SV)、心电图和 4D 流磁共振成像 (MRI)。对心电图波形进行处理,以提取患者特定的收缩与舒张比率(SDR)。入口边界条件是根据使用(1)SV 和(2)ECG 和 SV(ECG + SV)调整的通用主动脉血流波形定义的。4D 流磁共振成像得出的入口边界条件也用于特定患者的模拟,以提供比较和验证的黄金标准。使用经 ECG + SV 调整的入口流波形进行模拟,不仅成功再现了降主动脉中的血流分布,还准确预测了主入口撕裂(PET)和腹部区域的时间平均壁剪应力(TAWSS),以及主动脉根部到远端假腔的最大压力差 ∆Pmax。与仅使用 SV 调整入口波形的模拟相比,在调整方法中使用 ECG + SV 可显著降低 PET 处假腔射血分数的误差(从 149.1% 降至 6.2%),降低 PET 处 TAWSS 的误差(从 54.1% 降至 5.7%)和腹部区域的 TAWSS 误差(从 61.3% 降至 11.1%),并改善了 ∆Pmax 预测(从 283.1% 降至 18.8%)。然而,这两种入口波形都不能用于升主动脉 TAWSS 的准确预测。这项研究证明了 SDR 在为患者特异性血流动力学模拟定制入口血流波形方面的重要性。调整良好的血流波形对于确保模拟结果符合患者特异性要求至关重要,从而提高计算工具在未来临床应用中的可信度和保真度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new method for scaling inlet flow waveform in hemodynamic analysis of aortic dissection

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have shown great potentials in cardiovascular disease diagnosis and postoperative assessment. Patient-specific and well-tuned boundary conditions are key to obtaining accurate and reliable hemodynamic results. However, CFD simulations are usually performed under non-patient-specific flow conditions due to the absence of in vivo flow and pressure measurements. This study proposes a new method to overcome this challenge by tuning inlet boundary conditions using data extracted from electrocardiogram (ECG). Five patient-specific geometric models of type B aortic dissection were reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images. Other available data included stoke volume (SV), ECG, and 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ECG waveforms were processed to extract patient-specific systole to diastole ratio (SDR). Inlet boundary conditions were defined based on a generic aortic flow waveform tuned using (1) SV only, and (2) with ECG and SV (ECG + SV). 4D-flow MRI derived inlet boundary conditions were also used in patient-specific simulations to provide the gold standard for comparison and validation. Simulations using inlet flow waveform tuned with ECG + SV not only successfully reproduced flow distributions in the descending aorta but also provided accurate prediction of time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) in the primary entry tear (PET) and abdominal regions, as well as maximum pressure difference, ∆Pmax, from the aortic root to the distal false lumen. Compared with simulations with inlet waveform tuned with SV alone, using ECG + SV in the tuning method significantly reduced the error in false lumen ejection fraction at the PET (from 149.1% to 6.2%), reduced errors in TAWSS at the PET (from 54.1% to 5.7%) and in the abdominal region (from 61.3% to 11.1%), and improved ∆Pmax prediction (from 283.1% to 18.8%) However, neither of these inlet waveforms could be used for accurate prediction of TAWSS in the ascending aorta. This study demonstrates the importance of SDR in tailoring inlet flow waveforms for patient-specific hemodynamic simulations. A well-tuned flow waveform is essential for ensuring that the simulation results are patient-specific, thereby enhancing the confidence and fidelity of computational tools in future clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Effect of Targeted Deployment Filling Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. Modeling Fibrin Accumulation on Flow-Diverting Devices for Intracranial Aneurysms. A comparison of machine learning methods for recovering noisy and missing 4D flow MRI data. A semi-automatic method for block-structured hexahedral meshing of aortic dissections. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a healthy aortic valve and its surrounding haemodynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1