单细胞 ATAC-seq 数据基因组评分基准算法。

Xi Wang, Qiwei Lian, Haoyu Dong, Shuo Xu, Yaru Su, Xiaohui Wu
{"title":"单细胞 ATAC-seq 数据基因组评分基准算法。","authors":"Xi Wang, Qiwei Lian, Haoyu Dong, Shuo Xu, Yaru Su, Xiaohui Wu","doi":"10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gene set scoring (GSS) has been routinely conducted for gene expression analysis of bulk or single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data, which helps to decipher single-cell heterogeneity and cell type-specific variability by incorporating prior knowledge from functional gene sets. Single-cell assay for transposase accessible chromatin using sequencing (scATAC-seq) is a powerful technique for interrogating single-cell chromatin-based gene regulation, and genes or gene sets with dynamic regulatory potentials can be regarded as cell type-specific markers as if in single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq). However, there are few GSS tools specifically designed for scATAC-seq, and the applicability and performance of RNA-seq GSS tools on scATAC-seq data remain to be investigated. Here, we systematically benchmarked ten GSS tools, including four bulk RNA-seq tools, five scRNA-seq tools, and one scATAC-seq method. First, using matched scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq datasets, we found that the performance of GSS tools on scATAC-seq data was comparable to that on scRNA-seq, suggesting their applicability to scATAC-seq. Then, the performance of different GSS tools was extensively evaluated using up to ten scATAC-seq datasets. Moreover, we evaluated the impact of gene activity conversion, dropout imputation, and gene set collections on the results of GSS. Results show that dropout imputation can significantly promote the performance of almost all GSS tools, while the impact of gene activity conversion methods or gene set collections on GSS performance is more dependent on GSS tools or datasets. Finally, we provided practical guidelines for choosing appropriate preprocessing methods and GSS tools in different application scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":94020,"journal":{"name":"Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics","volume":"22 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking Algorithms for Gene Set Scoring of Single-cell ATAC-seq Data.\",\"authors\":\"Xi Wang, Qiwei Lian, Haoyu Dong, Shuo Xu, Yaru Su, Xiaohui Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gene set scoring (GSS) has been routinely conducted for gene expression analysis of bulk or single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data, which helps to decipher single-cell heterogeneity and cell type-specific variability by incorporating prior knowledge from functional gene sets. Single-cell assay for transposase accessible chromatin using sequencing (scATAC-seq) is a powerful technique for interrogating single-cell chromatin-based gene regulation, and genes or gene sets with dynamic regulatory potentials can be regarded as cell type-specific markers as if in single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq). However, there are few GSS tools specifically designed for scATAC-seq, and the applicability and performance of RNA-seq GSS tools on scATAC-seq data remain to be investigated. Here, we systematically benchmarked ten GSS tools, including four bulk RNA-seq tools, five scRNA-seq tools, and one scATAC-seq method. First, using matched scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq datasets, we found that the performance of GSS tools on scATAC-seq data was comparable to that on scRNA-seq, suggesting their applicability to scATAC-seq. Then, the performance of different GSS tools was extensively evaluated using up to ten scATAC-seq datasets. Moreover, we evaluated the impact of gene activity conversion, dropout imputation, and gene set collections on the results of GSS. Results show that dropout imputation can significantly promote the performance of almost all GSS tools, while the impact of gene activity conversion methods or gene set collections on GSS performance is more dependent on GSS tools or datasets. Finally, we provided practical guidelines for choosing appropriate preprocessing methods and GSS tools in different application scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423854/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因组评分(GSS)是对大量或单细胞 RNA 测序(RNA-seq)数据进行基因表达分析的常规方法,它通过结合功能基因组的先验知识,有助于解读单细胞异质性和细胞类型特异性变异。单细胞转座酶可访问染色质测序(scATAC-seq)是一项强大的技术,可用于研究基于染色质的单细胞基因调控,具有动态调控潜力的基因或基因集可被视为细胞类型特异性标记,如同单细胞RNA-seq(scRNA-seq)一样。然而,专门为 scATAC-seq 设计的 GSS 工具很少,RNA-seq GSS 工具在 scATAC-seq 数据上的适用性和性能仍有待研究。在这里,我们系统地对 10 种 GSS 工具进行了基准测试,包括 4 种批量 RNA-seq 工具、5 种 scRNA-seq 工具和 1 种 scATAC-seq 方法。首先,利用匹配的 scATAC-seq 和 scRNA-seq 数据集,我们发现 GSS 工具在 scATAC-seq 数据上的表现与在 scRNA-seq 上的表现相当,这表明它们适用于 scATAC-seq。然后,我们使用多达十个 scATAC-seq 数据集广泛评估了不同 GSS 工具的性能。此外,我们还评估了基因活性转换、剔除估算和基因集收集对 GSS 结果的影响。结果表明,剔除估算能显著提高几乎所有 GSS 工具的性能,而基因活性转换方法或基因组集合对 GSS 性能的影响则更多地取决于 GSS 工具或数据集。最后,我们为在不同应用场景中选择合适的预处理方法和 GSS 工具提供了实用指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarking Algorithms for Gene Set Scoring of Single-cell ATAC-seq Data.

Gene set scoring (GSS) has been routinely conducted for gene expression analysis of bulk or single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data, which helps to decipher single-cell heterogeneity and cell type-specific variability by incorporating prior knowledge from functional gene sets. Single-cell assay for transposase accessible chromatin using sequencing (scATAC-seq) is a powerful technique for interrogating single-cell chromatin-based gene regulation, and genes or gene sets with dynamic regulatory potentials can be regarded as cell type-specific markers as if in single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq). However, there are few GSS tools specifically designed for scATAC-seq, and the applicability and performance of RNA-seq GSS tools on scATAC-seq data remain to be investigated. Here, we systematically benchmarked ten GSS tools, including four bulk RNA-seq tools, five scRNA-seq tools, and one scATAC-seq method. First, using matched scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq datasets, we found that the performance of GSS tools on scATAC-seq data was comparable to that on scRNA-seq, suggesting their applicability to scATAC-seq. Then, the performance of different GSS tools was extensively evaluated using up to ten scATAC-seq datasets. Moreover, we evaluated the impact of gene activity conversion, dropout imputation, and gene set collections on the results of GSS. Results show that dropout imputation can significantly promote the performance of almost all GSS tools, while the impact of gene activity conversion methods or gene set collections on GSS performance is more dependent on GSS tools or datasets. Finally, we provided practical guidelines for choosing appropriate preprocessing methods and GSS tools in different application scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
iMFP-LG: Identification of Novel Multi-Functional Peptides by Using Protein Language Models and Graph-Based Deep Learning. ProtPipe: A Multifunctional Data Analysis Pipeline for Proteomics and Peptidomics. VISTA: A Tool for Fast Taxonomic Assignment of Viral Genome Sequences. Pangenome Reveals Gene Content Variations and Structural Variants Contributing to Pig Characteristics. SoyOD: An Integrated Soybean Multi-omics Database for Mining Genes and Biological Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1