基于离群值和误差修正方法的新型混合方法,利用气象变量预测河流流量

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Ecological Statistics Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1007/s10651-024-00628-4
Maha Shabbir, Sohail Chand, Farhat Iqbal
{"title":"基于离群值和误差修正方法的新型混合方法,利用气象变量预测河流流量","authors":"Maha Shabbir, Sohail Chand, Farhat Iqbal","doi":"10.1007/s10651-024-00628-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A new hybrid approach for the river discharge prediction is proposed by integrating the Hampel filter (HF) with an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model and multi-model error correction method. This study applied the HF to detect and correct outliers present in the data. Then, the HF-treated data variables were employed in the ARDL model to obtain discharge predictions and errors were obtained. Next, a multi-model approach (named ASR) was used based on a combination of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) models to predict errors. The ASR-predicted errors were aggregated with HF-ARDL prediction to determine the final HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model predictions. The effectiveness of this approach was explored and compared with different models on the discharge data of four rivers of the Indus River basin of Pakistan. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Domel station) is 96.88 m<sup>3</sup>/s in the testing phase that is 53.92%, 50.0%, 48.7%, 50.0%, 13.4%, 53.2%, 50.3%, 46.4%, and 49.1% lower than the RMSE of the multiple linear regression (MLR), SVM, ANN, RF, ARDL, HF-MLR, HF-SVM, HF-ANN, and HF-RF models respectively. On test data, the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values of the suggested HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Chattar Kallas station) is 0.8571, Jhelum River (Domel) is 0.8294, Kabul River (Nowshera) is 0.8291 and Kunhar River (Talhata) is 0.8506. Therefore, the proposed HF-ARDL-ASR model has shown superior performance, lower errors, and higher prediction accuracy than all comparative models in the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50519,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","volume":"415 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel hybrid approach based on outlier and error correction methods to predict river discharge using meteorological variables\",\"authors\":\"Maha Shabbir, Sohail Chand, Farhat Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10651-024-00628-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A new hybrid approach for the river discharge prediction is proposed by integrating the Hampel filter (HF) with an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model and multi-model error correction method. This study applied the HF to detect and correct outliers present in the data. Then, the HF-treated data variables were employed in the ARDL model to obtain discharge predictions and errors were obtained. Next, a multi-model approach (named ASR) was used based on a combination of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) models to predict errors. The ASR-predicted errors were aggregated with HF-ARDL prediction to determine the final HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model predictions. The effectiveness of this approach was explored and compared with different models on the discharge data of four rivers of the Indus River basin of Pakistan. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Domel station) is 96.88 m<sup>3</sup>/s in the testing phase that is 53.92%, 50.0%, 48.7%, 50.0%, 13.4%, 53.2%, 50.3%, 46.4%, and 49.1% lower than the RMSE of the multiple linear regression (MLR), SVM, ANN, RF, ARDL, HF-MLR, HF-SVM, HF-ANN, and HF-RF models respectively. On test data, the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values of the suggested HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Chattar Kallas station) is 0.8571, Jhelum River (Domel) is 0.8294, Kabul River (Nowshera) is 0.8291 and Kunhar River (Talhata) is 0.8506. Therefore, the proposed HF-ARDL-ASR model has shown superior performance, lower errors, and higher prediction accuracy than all comparative models in the study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Ecological Statistics\",\"volume\":\"415 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Ecological Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-024-00628-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-024-00628-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过将汉普尔滤波器(HF)与自回归分布滞后(ARDL)模型和多模型误差修正方法相结合,提出了一种新的混合方法来预测河流流量。本研究应用 HF 来检测和纠正数据中存在的异常值。然后,将经过高频处理的数据变量应用于 ARDL 模型,以获得放电预测和误差。接下来,在人工神经网络 (ANN)、支持向量机 (SVM) 和随机森林 (RF) 模型组合的基础上,使用了一种多模型方法(名为 ASR)来预测误差。ASR 预测的误差与 HF-ARDL 预测汇总,以确定最终的 HF-ARDL-ASR 混合模型预测结果。在巴基斯坦印度河流域四条河流的排水数据上,对这种方法的有效性进行了探索,并与不同的模型进行了比较。在测试阶段,杰赫勒姆河(Domel 站)HF-ARDL-ASR 混合模型的均方根误差(RMSE)为 96.88 立方米/秒,分别为 53.92%、50.0%、48.7%、50.0%、13.4%、53.2%、53.2%、53.2%、53.2%。分别比多元线性回归 (MLR)、SVM、ANN、RF、ARDL、HF-MLR、HF-SVM、HF-ANN 和 HF-RF 模型的 RMSE 低 53.92%、50.0%、48.7%、50.0%、13.2%、50.3%、46.4% 和 49.1%。在测试数据中,所建议的 HF-ARDL-ASR 混合模型在杰赫勒姆河(Chattar Kallas 站)的纳什-萨特克利夫效率(NSE)值为 0.8571,在杰赫勒姆河(Domel 站)的纳什-萨特克利夫效率(NSE)值为 0.8294,在喀布尔河(Nowshera 站)的纳什-萨特克利夫效率(NSE)值为 0.8291,在库纳尔河(Talhata 站)的纳什-萨特克利夫效率(NSE)值为 0.8506。因此,所提出的 HF-ARDL-ASR 模型与研究中的所有比较模型相比,性能更优越、误差更小、预测精度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel hybrid approach based on outlier and error correction methods to predict river discharge using meteorological variables

A new hybrid approach for the river discharge prediction is proposed by integrating the Hampel filter (HF) with an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model and multi-model error correction method. This study applied the HF to detect and correct outliers present in the data. Then, the HF-treated data variables were employed in the ARDL model to obtain discharge predictions and errors were obtained. Next, a multi-model approach (named ASR) was used based on a combination of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forest (RF) models to predict errors. The ASR-predicted errors were aggregated with HF-ARDL prediction to determine the final HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model predictions. The effectiveness of this approach was explored and compared with different models on the discharge data of four rivers of the Indus River basin of Pakistan. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Domel station) is 96.88 m3/s in the testing phase that is 53.92%, 50.0%, 48.7%, 50.0%, 13.4%, 53.2%, 50.3%, 46.4%, and 49.1% lower than the RMSE of the multiple linear regression (MLR), SVM, ANN, RF, ARDL, HF-MLR, HF-SVM, HF-ANN, and HF-RF models respectively. On test data, the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values of the suggested HF-ARDL-ASR hybrid model in Jhelum River (Chattar Kallas station) is 0.8571, Jhelum River (Domel) is 0.8294, Kabul River (Nowshera) is 0.8291 and Kunhar River (Talhata) is 0.8506. Therefore, the proposed HF-ARDL-ASR model has shown superior performance, lower errors, and higher prediction accuracy than all comparative models in the study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Ecological Statistics
Environmental and Ecological Statistics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Ecological Statistics publishes papers on practical applications of statistics and related quantitative methods to environmental science addressing contemporary issues. Emphasis is on applied mathematical statistics, statistical methodology, and data interpretation and improvement for future use, with a view to advance statistics for environment, ecology and environmental health, and to advance environmental theory and practice using valid statistics. Besides clarity of exposition, a single most important criterion for publication is the appropriateness of the statistical method to the particular environmental problem. The Journal covers all aspects of the collection, analysis, presentation and interpretation of environmental data for research, policy and regulation. The Journal is cross-disciplinary within the context of contemporary environmental issues and the associated statistical tools, concepts and methods. The Journal broadly covers theory and methods, case studies and applications, environmental change and statistical ecology, environmental health statistics and stochastics, and related areas. Special features include invited discussion papers; research communications; technical notes and consultation corner; mini-reviews; letters to the Editor; news, views and announcements; hardware and software reviews; data management etc.
期刊最新文献
Identifying key drivers of extinction for Chitala populations: data-driven insights from an intraguild predation model using a Bayesian framework Health effects of noise and application of machine learning techniques as prediction tools in noise induced health issues: a systematic review Multivariate Bayesian models with flexible shared interactions for analyzing spatio-temporal patterns of rare cancers A novel hybrid approach based on outlier and error correction methods to predict river discharge using meteorological variables Bayesian design methods for improving the effectiveness of ecosystem monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1