评估为脑损伤患者设计的 3D 打印书写辅助设备。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1177/15394492241265619
Fen-Ling Kuo, Tien-Yu Kuo, Yi-Shan Lee, Yi-Shien Wu, Shih-Wei Huang, Hsin-Chieh Lee
{"title":"评估为脑损伤患者设计的 3D 打印书写辅助设备。","authors":"Fen-Ling Kuo, Tien-Yu Kuo, Yi-Shan Lee, Yi-Shien Wu, Shih-Wei Huang, Hsin-Chieh Lee","doi":"10.1177/15394492241265619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three-dimensional-printed assistive devices hold promise for improving writing abilities, yet factors influencing device selection and their impact on satisfaction and effectiveness remain unclear, especially in adults, as they are typically tested on children. The aim of this article is to assess the efficacy and satisfaction with a writing assistive device at different angles among individuals with brain injury and explore device selection factors. Twenty-six participants with brain injuries selected their preferred device angle. Writing speed, quality, and satisfaction were recorded. Immediate speed improvements were significant at 5° and 30° (<i>p</i> = .006, .013, respectively). Satisfaction scores did not significantly differ among angles. Normotonia in elbow (<i>p</i> < .001; odds ratio: 3.403) and wrist (<i>p</i> ≤ .001; odds ratio: 2.695) muscles increased the likelihood of selecting the 5° device. Immediate speed improvements at specific angles highlight the influence of muscle normotonia on device selection, vital for tailored brain injury rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47195,"journal":{"name":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","volume":" ","pages":"15394492241265619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a 3D-Printed Writing Assistive Device for People With Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Fen-Ling Kuo, Tien-Yu Kuo, Yi-Shan Lee, Yi-Shien Wu, Shih-Wei Huang, Hsin-Chieh Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15394492241265619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three-dimensional-printed assistive devices hold promise for improving writing abilities, yet factors influencing device selection and their impact on satisfaction and effectiveness remain unclear, especially in adults, as they are typically tested on children. The aim of this article is to assess the efficacy and satisfaction with a writing assistive device at different angles among individuals with brain injury and explore device selection factors. Twenty-six participants with brain injuries selected their preferred device angle. Writing speed, quality, and satisfaction were recorded. Immediate speed improvements were significant at 5° and 30° (<i>p</i> = .006, .013, respectively). Satisfaction scores did not significantly differ among angles. Normotonia in elbow (<i>p</i> < .001; odds ratio: 3.403) and wrist (<i>p</i> ≤ .001; odds ratio: 2.695) muscles increased the likelihood of selecting the 5° device. Immediate speed improvements at specific angles highlight the influence of muscle normotonia on device selection, vital for tailored brain injury rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15394492241265619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492241265619\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492241265619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

三维打印辅助设备有望提高书写能力,但影响设备选择的因素及其对满意度和有效性的影响仍不明确,尤其是在成人中,因为这些设备通常是在儿童身上进行测试。本文旨在从不同角度评估脑损伤患者对书写辅助设备的功效和满意度,并探讨设备选择因素。26 名脑损伤患者选择了他们喜欢的装置角度。对书写速度、质量和满意度进行了记录。在使用 5° 和 30° 时,书写速度有明显改善(p = .006 和 .013)。不同角度的满意度评分差异不大。肘部(p < .001;几率比:3.403)和腕部(p ≤ .001;几率比:2.695)肌肉的肌张力正常增加了选择 5° 设备的可能性。特定角度下速度的即时提高凸显了肌肉正常状态对设备选择的影响,这对量身定制的脑损伤康复至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a 3D-Printed Writing Assistive Device for People With Brain Injury.

Three-dimensional-printed assistive devices hold promise for improving writing abilities, yet factors influencing device selection and their impact on satisfaction and effectiveness remain unclear, especially in adults, as they are typically tested on children. The aim of this article is to assess the efficacy and satisfaction with a writing assistive device at different angles among individuals with brain injury and explore device selection factors. Twenty-six participants with brain injuries selected their preferred device angle. Writing speed, quality, and satisfaction were recorded. Immediate speed improvements were significant at 5° and 30° (p = .006, .013, respectively). Satisfaction scores did not significantly differ among angles. Normotonia in elbow (p < .001; odds ratio: 3.403) and wrist (p ≤ .001; odds ratio: 2.695) muscles increased the likelihood of selecting the 5° device. Immediate speed improvements at specific angles highlight the influence of muscle normotonia on device selection, vital for tailored brain injury rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The aim of OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health is to advance knowledge and science in occupational therapy and related fields, nationally and internationally, through the publication of scholarly literature and research. The journal publishes research that advances the understanding of occupation as it relates to participation and health.
期刊最新文献
Parenting With and Beyond Cancer: A Photo-Elicitation Study. A Mixed-Methods Examination of Lost Occupational Choice in Retirement. Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive): Investigating Construct Validity and Concordance of Australasian Data. Practitioner Perspectives on Occupation-Based Practice Across Varied Settings. Occupational Therapy Practitioners' Perceptions of Providing Services for the Acute Postpartum Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1