发掘 FMEA 在高等教育中的潜力:改进风险管理和提高质量的途径

Maryam Zulfiqar, S. Bhat, M. Sony, Willem Salentijn, V. Swarnakar, Jiju Antony, E. Cudney, Sandy Furterer, Olivia McDermott, Raja Jayaraman, Monika Foster
{"title":"发掘 FMEA 在高等教育中的潜力:改进风险管理和提高质量的途径","authors":"Maryam Zulfiqar, S. Bhat, M. Sony, Willem Salentijn, V. Swarnakar, Jiju Antony, E. Cudney, Sandy Furterer, Olivia McDermott, Raja Jayaraman, Monika Foster","doi":"10.1108/tqm-01-2024-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWhile educators impart FMEA instruction, its practical implementation within the educational sector remains limited. This study investigates the application of FMEA within higher education institutions. Implementing FMEA in these institutions is difficult due to statutory requirements, schedule restrictions, and stakeholder participation challenges. Moreover, higher education institutions struggle with preserving education quality, faculty training, and resource management, complicating organised methods such as FMEA.Design/methodology/approachThis research conducted a global survey to identify the critical success factors, benefits, and common challenges in using FMEA in the higher education sector.FindingsThe outcomes highlighted that lack of awareness regarding the tools’ benefits is the primary barrier to FMEA implementation. However, respondents perceive that FMEA can improve process reliability and quality in higher education institutions. Further, the analyses found that knowledge about the FMEA tools is the prime critical success factor, and the lack of time due to other priorities in the organisation is a significant challenge in tapping the potential of FMEA.Research limitations/implicationsA limitation of the study is the relatively low number of HEIs surveyed globally. Further, the study provides a broad perspective rather than a focused study on one HEI.Practical implicationsThis study addresses this gap by exploring the potential benefits, challenges, and factors associated with the successful adoption of FMEA in academic settings. Using this information, HEIs can become more successful in applying FMEA.Originality/valueThis study is unique in its exploration of the application of FMEA with higher education institutions for service quality improvement.","PeriodicalId":508533,"journal":{"name":"The TQM Journal","volume":"102 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the potential of FMEA in higher education: pathway to improved risk management and quality\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Zulfiqar, S. Bhat, M. Sony, Willem Salentijn, V. Swarnakar, Jiju Antony, E. Cudney, Sandy Furterer, Olivia McDermott, Raja Jayaraman, Monika Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/tqm-01-2024-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeWhile educators impart FMEA instruction, its practical implementation within the educational sector remains limited. This study investigates the application of FMEA within higher education institutions. Implementing FMEA in these institutions is difficult due to statutory requirements, schedule restrictions, and stakeholder participation challenges. Moreover, higher education institutions struggle with preserving education quality, faculty training, and resource management, complicating organised methods such as FMEA.Design/methodology/approachThis research conducted a global survey to identify the critical success factors, benefits, and common challenges in using FMEA in the higher education sector.FindingsThe outcomes highlighted that lack of awareness regarding the tools’ benefits is the primary barrier to FMEA implementation. However, respondents perceive that FMEA can improve process reliability and quality in higher education institutions. Further, the analyses found that knowledge about the FMEA tools is the prime critical success factor, and the lack of time due to other priorities in the organisation is a significant challenge in tapping the potential of FMEA.Research limitations/implicationsA limitation of the study is the relatively low number of HEIs surveyed globally. Further, the study provides a broad perspective rather than a focused study on one HEI.Practical implicationsThis study addresses this gap by exploring the potential benefits, challenges, and factors associated with the successful adoption of FMEA in academic settings. Using this information, HEIs can become more successful in applying FMEA.Originality/valueThis study is unique in its exploration of the application of FMEA with higher education institutions for service quality improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The TQM Journal\",\"volume\":\"102 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The TQM Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-01-2024-0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The TQM Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-01-2024-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的虽然教育工作者传授了 FMEA 的知识,但其在教育领域的实际应用仍然有限。本研究调查了 FMEA 在高等教育机构中的应用情况。由于法定要求、日程限制和利益相关者参与的挑战,在这些机构中实施 FMEA 十分困难。此外,高等教育机构在维护教育质量、师资培训和资源管理等方面也面临着困难,这使得 FMEA 等有组织的方法变得更加复杂。设计/方法/途径本研究开展了一项全球调查,以确定在高等教育领域使用 FMEA 的关键成功因素、益处和常见挑战。然而,受访者认为 FMEA 可以提高高等教育机构流程的可靠性和质量。此外,分析还发现,对 FMEA 工具的了解是成功的首要关键因素,而由于组织中的其他优先事项而缺乏时间,则是挖掘 FMEA 潜力的重大挑战。本研究通过探讨在学术环境中成功采用 FMEA 的潜在好处、挑战和相关因素,填补了这一空白。利用这些信息,高等院校可以更成功地应用 FMEA。原创性/价值本研究在探索高等院校应用 FMEA 以提高服务质量方面独树一帜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unveiling the potential of FMEA in higher education: pathway to improved risk management and quality
PurposeWhile educators impart FMEA instruction, its practical implementation within the educational sector remains limited. This study investigates the application of FMEA within higher education institutions. Implementing FMEA in these institutions is difficult due to statutory requirements, schedule restrictions, and stakeholder participation challenges. Moreover, higher education institutions struggle with preserving education quality, faculty training, and resource management, complicating organised methods such as FMEA.Design/methodology/approachThis research conducted a global survey to identify the critical success factors, benefits, and common challenges in using FMEA in the higher education sector.FindingsThe outcomes highlighted that lack of awareness regarding the tools’ benefits is the primary barrier to FMEA implementation. However, respondents perceive that FMEA can improve process reliability and quality in higher education institutions. Further, the analyses found that knowledge about the FMEA tools is the prime critical success factor, and the lack of time due to other priorities in the organisation is a significant challenge in tapping the potential of FMEA.Research limitations/implicationsA limitation of the study is the relatively low number of HEIs surveyed globally. Further, the study provides a broad perspective rather than a focused study on one HEI.Practical implicationsThis study addresses this gap by exploring the potential benefits, challenges, and factors associated with the successful adoption of FMEA in academic settings. Using this information, HEIs can become more successful in applying FMEA.Originality/valueThis study is unique in its exploration of the application of FMEA with higher education institutions for service quality improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing Industry 4.0 implementation maturity in manufacturing MSMEs – a graph theory and matrix-based approach Assessing Lean Six Sigma and quality performance improvement in Italian public healthcare organizations: a validated scale Application of an approach integrating the Kano model and the fuzzy systems theory: a strategic analysis of consumer satisfaction scores The impact of TQM on financial and non-financial performance: the mediating role of corporate social responsibility A novel framework for understanding the interplay between the mobile wallet service quality dimensions and loyalty intention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1