作为合作研究概念框架的研究者主体性:探索成人教育者的经历如何导致研究者视角的审视

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.56105/cjsae.v23i1.27
N. Taber
{"title":"作为合作研究概念框架的研究者主体性:探索成人教育者的经历如何导致研究者视角的审视","authors":"N. Taber","doi":"10.56105/cjsae.v23i1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses how narrative research that began as an exploration of adult educator practice transitioned to incorporate an examination of researcher lenses, ultimately resulting in an increased understanding of the critical role that researcher subjectivity plays in the collaborative qualitative research process.First, we discuss the aims and methodology of our original research study, which explored significant experiences in adult educators' practice. We examine how our focus shifted during the analytical stages of this research to explore our own presence in the research. We then discuss each of our own subjectivitiesand how our individual researcher lenses influenced our collaborative research. Next, we detail our research findings, exploring how acknowledging our own subjectivities altered our approach to the data, helping us to reconceptualize the 14 initial themes in our interviews with adult educators to three overridingones: meaningfulness and ambiguities, power and critique, and reflection and authenticity. We then discuss emerging issues about collaborative inquiry and how our subjectivities as researchers construct lenses that continually inform our research processes, including the analysis and interpretation of data. We concludethat researcher subjectivities, when overtly invited into the research process, can become powerful tools in collaborative qualitative research.","PeriodicalId":42535,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Researcher Subjectivities as a Conceptual Frame in Collaborative Research: How Exploring the Experiences of Adult Educators Led to Examining Researcher Lenses\",\"authors\":\"N. Taber\",\"doi\":\"10.56105/cjsae.v23i1.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses how narrative research that began as an exploration of adult educator practice transitioned to incorporate an examination of researcher lenses, ultimately resulting in an increased understanding of the critical role that researcher subjectivity plays in the collaborative qualitative research process.First, we discuss the aims and methodology of our original research study, which explored significant experiences in adult educators' practice. We examine how our focus shifted during the analytical stages of this research to explore our own presence in the research. We then discuss each of our own subjectivitiesand how our individual researcher lenses influenced our collaborative research. Next, we detail our research findings, exploring how acknowledging our own subjectivities altered our approach to the data, helping us to reconceptualize the 14 initial themes in our interviews with adult educators to three overridingones: meaningfulness and ambiguities, power and critique, and reflection and authenticity. We then discuss emerging issues about collaborative inquiry and how our subjectivities as researchers construct lenses that continually inform our research processes, including the analysis and interpretation of data. We concludethat researcher subjectivities, when overtly invited into the research process, can become powerful tools in collaborative qualitative research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56105/cjsae.v23i1.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56105/cjsae.v23i1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

首先,我们讨论了我们最初研究的目的和方法,这项研究探讨了成人教育工作者实践中的重要经验。首先,我们讨论了我们最初研究的目的和方法,该研究探讨了成人教育工作者实践中的重要经验。我们探讨了在该研究的分析阶段,我们如何将重点转移到探讨我们自己在研究中的存在。然后,我们讨论我们每个人的主体性,以及我们各自的研究者视角是如何影响我们的合作研究的。接下来,我们将详细介绍我们的研究成果,探讨承认自己的主体性如何改变了我们处理数据的方法,帮助我们将与成人教育工作者访谈中的 14 个初始主题重新概念化为三个首要主题:意义与模糊性、权力与批判、反思与真实性。然后,我们讨论了新出现的有关合作探究的问题,以及我们作为研究者的主体性是如何构建透视镜的,这些透视镜不断为我们的研究过程提供信息,包括对数据的分析和解释。最后,我们得出结论:研究者的主观性如果被公开纳入研究过程,就会成为合作定性研究的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Researcher Subjectivities as a Conceptual Frame in Collaborative Research: How Exploring the Experiences of Adult Educators Led to Examining Researcher Lenses
This article discusses how narrative research that began as an exploration of adult educator practice transitioned to incorporate an examination of researcher lenses, ultimately resulting in an increased understanding of the critical role that researcher subjectivity plays in the collaborative qualitative research process.First, we discuss the aims and methodology of our original research study, which explored significant experiences in adult educators' practice. We examine how our focus shifted during the analytical stages of this research to explore our own presence in the research. We then discuss each of our own subjectivitiesand how our individual researcher lenses influenced our collaborative research. Next, we detail our research findings, exploring how acknowledging our own subjectivities altered our approach to the data, helping us to reconceptualize the 14 initial themes in our interviews with adult educators to three overridingones: meaningfulness and ambiguities, power and critique, and reflection and authenticity. We then discuss emerging issues about collaborative inquiry and how our subjectivities as researchers construct lenses that continually inform our research processes, including the analysis and interpretation of data. We concludethat researcher subjectivities, when overtly invited into the research process, can become powerful tools in collaborative qualitative research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education
Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
"A Country at the End of the World": Living and Learning in New France, 1608-1760 Canadian Adult Education: Neither Dying nor Dead Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Shawn Wilson. Fernwood Publishing, Halifax and Winnipeg, 2008, 144 pages. Recherches Francophones en alphabitisation des adultes CASAE/ACÉÉA in the global neo-liberal era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1