基于新公共治理视角的印度尼西亚传统市场保护

Samodra Wibawa, Rindu S. M. Firdaus, Pruthut Indroyono, Dumairy Dumairy, L. Savitri
{"title":"基于新公共治理视角的印度尼西亚传统市场保护","authors":"Samodra Wibawa, Rindu S. M. Firdaus, Pruthut Indroyono, Dumairy Dumairy, L. Savitri","doi":"10.4018/ijabim.349223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses the new public governance concept to explore how to manage traditional markets in Indonesia, which are marginalized and threatened by modern shops and online stores. Comparative research was conducted in two markets in Yogyakarta and West Sumatra. The study employed a qualitative approach involving in-depth interviews and observations. It found that the two traditional markets are managed in a participative-democratic way, involving local culture/wisdom. The social environment contributes to the survival of traditional markets. The markets also function as a venue for social interaction, idea exchange, friendship, small talk, and political discourse. The study suggests that the management model used by these two markets should be implemented in other traditional markets in Indonesia. To strengthen the claim that the democratic-participatory model is more successful than other models, this study can be compared to research on markets managed by government agencies and those which are managed undemocratically by traders and the community.","PeriodicalId":505762,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preserving Traditional Market in Indonesia Based on the New Public Governance Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Samodra Wibawa, Rindu S. M. Firdaus, Pruthut Indroyono, Dumairy Dumairy, L. Savitri\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijabim.349223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses the new public governance concept to explore how to manage traditional markets in Indonesia, which are marginalized and threatened by modern shops and online stores. Comparative research was conducted in two markets in Yogyakarta and West Sumatra. The study employed a qualitative approach involving in-depth interviews and observations. It found that the two traditional markets are managed in a participative-democratic way, involving local culture/wisdom. The social environment contributes to the survival of traditional markets. The markets also function as a venue for social interaction, idea exchange, friendship, small talk, and political discourse. The study suggests that the management model used by these two markets should be implemented in other traditional markets in Indonesia. To strengthen the claim that the democratic-participatory model is more successful than other models, this study can be compared to research on markets managed by government agencies and those which are managed undemocratically by traders and the community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijabim.349223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijabim.349223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文运用新的公共治理理念,探讨如何管理印度尼西亚的传统市场,这些市场已被边缘化,并受到现代商店和网店的威胁。比较研究在日惹和西苏门答腊的两个市场进行。研究采用了定性方法,包括深入访谈和观察。研究发现,这两个传统市场是以参与式民主方式管理的,并融入了当地文化/智慧。社会环境有助于传统市场的生存。市场也是社会互动、思想交流、友谊、闲聊和政治对话的场所。研究建议,这两个市场采用的管理模式应在印尼其他传统市场推行。为了加强民主-参与模式比其他模式更成功的说法,本研究可与对由政府机构管理的市场以及由商贩和社区非民主管理的市场的研究进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preserving Traditional Market in Indonesia Based on the New Public Governance Perspective
This paper uses the new public governance concept to explore how to manage traditional markets in Indonesia, which are marginalized and threatened by modern shops and online stores. Comparative research was conducted in two markets in Yogyakarta and West Sumatra. The study employed a qualitative approach involving in-depth interviews and observations. It found that the two traditional markets are managed in a participative-democratic way, involving local culture/wisdom. The social environment contributes to the survival of traditional markets. The markets also function as a venue for social interaction, idea exchange, friendship, small talk, and political discourse. The study suggests that the management model used by these two markets should be implemented in other traditional markets in Indonesia. To strengthen the claim that the democratic-participatory model is more successful than other models, this study can be compared to research on markets managed by government agencies and those which are managed undemocratically by traders and the community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Inflation Affect Emissions Reduction? Effect of Transparency of Algorithmic Performance Management on Proactive Work Behavior Learner Leadership and Student Loyalty Preserving Traditional Market in Indonesia Based on the New Public Governance Perspective Impacts of Procedural Justice and Ethical Leadership on Organizational Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1