Wildan Bintang Sanditya, I. W. Yasa, Yusuf Adiwibowo
{"title":"在 PT.Smart Multifinance(对第 5/Pdt.G.S/2021/PN Bit 号决定的研究)","authors":"Wildan Bintang Sanditya, I. W. Yasa, Yusuf Adiwibowo","doi":"10.55677/ijssers/v04i7y2024-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bad credit is a common problem in lending, and finance companies often use debt collectors to withdraw collateral if debtors fail to pay. This withdrawal must comply with applicable regulations. PT. Smart Multifinance used debt collectors in the dispute case with consumer Mulyanti Badu in Court Decision Number 5/Pdt.g.s/2021/PN Bit,. Forced withdrawals carried out by debt collectors without a court decision or fiduciary certificate are considered unlawful. This research aims to analyze the legality of using debt collector services in withdrawing fiduciary guarantees and legal protection for consumers in these disputes. The research uses normative juridical methods with a statutory and conceptual approach, using primary and secondary legal materials. The research conclusion shows that the use of debt collector services is legal if it complies with Indonesian law and correct procedures. Legal protection for consumers includes internal protection (in agreements) and external protection (legislative).","PeriodicalId":275702,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION RESEARCH STUDIES","volume":"143 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Debt Collector Services in the Forced Withdrawal of Fiduciary Guarantees at PT. Smart Multifinance (Study of Decision Number 5/Pdt.G.S/2021/PN Bit)\",\"authors\":\"Wildan Bintang Sanditya, I. W. Yasa, Yusuf Adiwibowo\",\"doi\":\"10.55677/ijssers/v04i7y2024-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bad credit is a common problem in lending, and finance companies often use debt collectors to withdraw collateral if debtors fail to pay. This withdrawal must comply with applicable regulations. PT. Smart Multifinance used debt collectors in the dispute case with consumer Mulyanti Badu in Court Decision Number 5/Pdt.g.s/2021/PN Bit,. Forced withdrawals carried out by debt collectors without a court decision or fiduciary certificate are considered unlawful. This research aims to analyze the legality of using debt collector services in withdrawing fiduciary guarantees and legal protection for consumers in these disputes. The research uses normative juridical methods with a statutory and conceptual approach, using primary and secondary legal materials. The research conclusion shows that the use of debt collector services is legal if it complies with Indonesian law and correct procedures. Legal protection for consumers includes internal protection (in agreements) and external protection (legislative).\",\"PeriodicalId\":275702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION RESEARCH STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"143 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION RESEARCH STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/v04i7y2024-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION RESEARCH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/v04i7y2024-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
不良信用是贷款中的一个常见问题,如果债务人无法偿还债务,金融公司通常会利用讨债人提取抵押品。这种提取必须符合适用的法规。PT.Smart Multifinance 在与消费者 Mulyanti Badu 的纠纷案件中使用了讨债公司,法院判决编号为 5/Pdt.g.s/2021/PN Bit。讨债公司在没有法院判决或信托证书的情况下强行提款被认为是非法的。本研究旨在分析在这些纠纷中,利用讨债公司服务撤销受托担保的合法性以及对消费者的法律保护。研究采用规范法学方法,以法定和概念为基础,使用第一手和第二手法律材料。研究结论表明,如果符合印尼法律和正确的程序,使用讨债公司的服务是合法的。对消费者的法律保护包括内部保护(协议)和外部保护(立法)。
The Use of Debt Collector Services in the Forced Withdrawal of Fiduciary Guarantees at PT. Smart Multifinance (Study of Decision Number 5/Pdt.G.S/2021/PN Bit)
Bad credit is a common problem in lending, and finance companies often use debt collectors to withdraw collateral if debtors fail to pay. This withdrawal must comply with applicable regulations. PT. Smart Multifinance used debt collectors in the dispute case with consumer Mulyanti Badu in Court Decision Number 5/Pdt.g.s/2021/PN Bit,. Forced withdrawals carried out by debt collectors without a court decision or fiduciary certificate are considered unlawful. This research aims to analyze the legality of using debt collector services in withdrawing fiduciary guarantees and legal protection for consumers in these disputes. The research uses normative juridical methods with a statutory and conceptual approach, using primary and secondary legal materials. The research conclusion shows that the use of debt collector services is legal if it complies with Indonesian law and correct procedures. Legal protection for consumers includes internal protection (in agreements) and external protection (legislative).