中国宪法审查本土化研究--以美国为参照

Yunxing Luo
{"title":"中国宪法审查本土化研究--以美国为参照","authors":"Yunxing Luo","doi":"10.54097/0f3acn65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the concept and importance of constitutional review. The article analyses judicial review in the United States and its jurisprudential basis, taking mainly American judicial review as a reference. In analysing the justification process of judicial review, the article cuts through the separation of powers and the least dangerous branch theory. In the face of elitist blame, the article specifically analyses how the non-democratic process of judicial review achieves democratic ends. On this basis, the author analyses constitutional review in China and the reasons why China's attempt to use judicial review ended in failure. Through comparison, the author summarises the political system factors, political philosophical thought factors and judicial factors that led to the failure. After that author suggests that judicial review is not directly applicable in China. Finally, the paper attempts to present the constitutional court model as a possible transitional model for China's future attempts to develop a judicial review model.","PeriodicalId":346834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"35 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States\",\"authors\":\"Yunxing Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.54097/0f3acn65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the concept and importance of constitutional review. The article analyses judicial review in the United States and its jurisprudential basis, taking mainly American judicial review as a reference. In analysing the justification process of judicial review, the article cuts through the separation of powers and the least dangerous branch theory. In the face of elitist blame, the article specifically analyses how the non-democratic process of judicial review achieves democratic ends. On this basis, the author analyses constitutional review in China and the reasons why China's attempt to use judicial review ended in failure. Through comparison, the author summarises the political system factors, political philosophical thought factors and judicial factors that led to the failure. After that author suggests that judicial review is not directly applicable in China. Finally, the paper attempts to present the constitutional court model as a possible transitional model for China's future attempts to develop a judicial review model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"35 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54097/0f3acn65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54097/0f3acn65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了宪法审查的概念和重要性。文章主要以美国的司法审查为参照,分析了美国的司法审查及其法理基础。在分析司法审查的正当性过程时,文章突破了三权分立和最不危险部门理论。面对精英主义的指责,文章具体分析了司法审查的非民主过程是如何实现民主目的的。在此基础上,作者分析了中国的宪法审查以及中国尝试使用司法审查以失败告终的原因。通过比较,作者总结了导致失败的政治制度因素、政治哲学思想因素和司法因素。之后,作者提出司法审查在中国并不直接适用。最后,本文试图提出宪法法院模式作为中国未来尝试发展司法审查模式的一种可能的过渡模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States
This paper discusses the concept and importance of constitutional review. The article analyses judicial review in the United States and its jurisprudential basis, taking mainly American judicial review as a reference. In analysing the justification process of judicial review, the article cuts through the separation of powers and the least dangerous branch theory. In the face of elitist blame, the article specifically analyses how the non-democratic process of judicial review achieves democratic ends. On this basis, the author analyses constitutional review in China and the reasons why China's attempt to use judicial review ended in failure. Through comparison, the author summarises the political system factors, political philosophical thought factors and judicial factors that led to the failure. After that author suggests that judicial review is not directly applicable in China. Finally, the paper attempts to present the constitutional court model as a possible transitional model for China's future attempts to develop a judicial review model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Innovation of Cross-cultural Communication Path of Elegies of the South in the New Media Era Beauty but not obscenity - Aromatic depictions in the poetry of the Sheng Tang Dynasty The Relationship between Music Preferences and Personality Traits The Overview of Early Learning Materials Development “Post-Truth”: Diversified Visual Expression of Social Issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1