{"title":"特里法平原含水层的风险强度评估:危险量化、土地利用分析、动态脆弱性 GCITF 和 DRASTIC 方法的整合。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to assess the level of groundwater pollution risk in the Triffa Plain, stemming from various pollution sources, with a specific focus on agricultural intensification and excessive pesticide use. Data were collected from ABHM (the Moulouya Hydraulic Basin Agency) and ORMVAM (Regional Office of Moulouya Agricultural Development), and a field visit was conducted in July 2023. The study utilized two main methodologies for mapping risk intensity: the COST 620 action and overlaying vulnerability maps with the land use (LU) factor. Vulnerability maps were generated using the original DRASTIC method and the new dynamic vulnerability assessment method, GCITF.</p><p>The research approach involved comparing the COST 620 risk index (Ri) and the land use risk index (LU) to identify the most suitable method for the study area. Due to challenges in inventorying various point sources of pollution, the study focused on mapping the primary sources of pollution (diffuse, point, and linear). The key findings indicate that the predominant pollution intensity in the region is high, covering 60.66% of the total surface area. These results closely align with those obtained using the European COST 620 approach and the spatial distribution of nitrates. The study demonstrates the reliability of integrating the GCITF method in assessing groundwater contamination risk, highlighting the significant negative impacts of agricultural activities on the Triffa Plain aquifer, primarily due to uncontrolled pesticide and fertilizer use and point sources of pollution.</p><p>This study suggests that implementing targeted technical solutions for specific pollution sources is crucial for reducing contamination in the Triffa Plain. These pollution risk intensity maps can assist planners and decision-makers in understanding the origin of pollution and identifying necessary actions to minimize contamination risk, contributing to better groundwater management and protection in the region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37879,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of risk intensity in the triffa plain aquifer: Integration of hazard quantification, land use analysis, dynamic vulnerability GCITF, and DRASTIC method\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aims to assess the level of groundwater pollution risk in the Triffa Plain, stemming from various pollution sources, with a specific focus on agricultural intensification and excessive pesticide use. Data were collected from ABHM (the Moulouya Hydraulic Basin Agency) and ORMVAM (Regional Office of Moulouya Agricultural Development), and a field visit was conducted in July 2023. The study utilized two main methodologies for mapping risk intensity: the COST 620 action and overlaying vulnerability maps with the land use (LU) factor. Vulnerability maps were generated using the original DRASTIC method and the new dynamic vulnerability assessment method, GCITF.</p><p>The research approach involved comparing the COST 620 risk index (Ri) and the land use risk index (LU) to identify the most suitable method for the study area. Due to challenges in inventorying various point sources of pollution, the study focused on mapping the primary sources of pollution (diffuse, point, and linear). The key findings indicate that the predominant pollution intensity in the region is high, covering 60.66% of the total surface area. These results closely align with those obtained using the European COST 620 approach and the spatial distribution of nitrates. The study demonstrates the reliability of integrating the GCITF method in assessing groundwater contamination risk, highlighting the significant negative impacts of agricultural activities on the Triffa Plain aquifer, primarily due to uncontrolled pesticide and fertilizer use and point sources of pollution.</p><p>This study suggests that implementing targeted technical solutions for specific pollution sources is crucial for reducing contamination in the Triffa Plain. These pollution risk intensity maps can assist planners and decision-makers in understanding the origin of pollution and identifying necessary actions to minimize contamination risk, contributing to better groundwater management and protection in the region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Groundwater for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Groundwater for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X24002145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352801X24002145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of risk intensity in the triffa plain aquifer: Integration of hazard quantification, land use analysis, dynamic vulnerability GCITF, and DRASTIC method
This study aims to assess the level of groundwater pollution risk in the Triffa Plain, stemming from various pollution sources, with a specific focus on agricultural intensification and excessive pesticide use. Data were collected from ABHM (the Moulouya Hydraulic Basin Agency) and ORMVAM (Regional Office of Moulouya Agricultural Development), and a field visit was conducted in July 2023. The study utilized two main methodologies for mapping risk intensity: the COST 620 action and overlaying vulnerability maps with the land use (LU) factor. Vulnerability maps were generated using the original DRASTIC method and the new dynamic vulnerability assessment method, GCITF.
The research approach involved comparing the COST 620 risk index (Ri) and the land use risk index (LU) to identify the most suitable method for the study area. Due to challenges in inventorying various point sources of pollution, the study focused on mapping the primary sources of pollution (diffuse, point, and linear). The key findings indicate that the predominant pollution intensity in the region is high, covering 60.66% of the total surface area. These results closely align with those obtained using the European COST 620 approach and the spatial distribution of nitrates. The study demonstrates the reliability of integrating the GCITF method in assessing groundwater contamination risk, highlighting the significant negative impacts of agricultural activities on the Triffa Plain aquifer, primarily due to uncontrolled pesticide and fertilizer use and point sources of pollution.
This study suggests that implementing targeted technical solutions for specific pollution sources is crucial for reducing contamination in the Triffa Plain. These pollution risk intensity maps can assist planners and decision-makers in understanding the origin of pollution and identifying necessary actions to minimize contamination risk, contributing to better groundwater management and protection in the region.
期刊介绍:
Groundwater for Sustainable Development is directed to different stakeholders and professionals, including government and non-governmental organizations, international funding agencies, universities, public water institutions, public health and other public/private sector professionals, and other relevant institutions. It is aimed at professionals, academics and students in the fields of disciplines such as: groundwater and its connection to surface hydrology and environment, soil sciences, engineering, ecology, microbiology, atmospheric sciences, analytical chemistry, hydro-engineering, water technology, environmental ethics, economics, public health, policy, as well as social sciences, legal disciplines, or any other area connected with water issues. The objectives of this journal are to facilitate: • The improvement of effective and sustainable management of water resources across the globe. • The improvement of human access to groundwater resources in adequate quantity and good quality. • The meeting of the increasing demand for drinking and irrigation water needed for food security to contribute to a social and economically sound human development. • The creation of a global inter- and multidisciplinary platform and forum to improve our understanding of groundwater resources and to advocate their effective and sustainable management and protection against contamination. • Interdisciplinary information exchange and to stimulate scientific research in the fields of groundwater related sciences and social and health sciences required to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals for sustainable development.