关于拍摄故事干预对提供者污名化影响的混合第 III 类分析》(Hybrid Type III Analysis of a Filmed Story-Telling Intervention's Impact on Provider Stigma)。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1177/15394492241260022
Sally Wasmuth, Johnna Belkiewitz, Edward Miech, Chih-Ying Li, Alex Harris, Jocelyne Hernandez, Caitlin Horsford, Carlton Smith, Dawn Bravata
{"title":"关于拍摄故事干预对提供者污名化影响的混合第 III 类分析》(Hybrid Type III Analysis of a Filmed Story-Telling Intervention's Impact on Provider Stigma)。","authors":"Sally Wasmuth, Johnna Belkiewitz, Edward Miech, Chih-Ying Li, Alex Harris, Jocelyne Hernandez, Caitlin Horsford, Carlton Smith, Dawn Bravata","doi":"10.1177/15394492241260022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identity Development Evolution and Sharing (IDEAS) reduces provider stigma, but few have been trained to implement IDEAS, highlighting a need for implementation strategies that facilitate uptake. We evaluated whether external facilitation successfully supported IDEAS implementation and whether IDEAS reduced provider stigma within and across sites irrespective of implementation barriers and facilitators. Key informants from 10 sites completed interviews and surveys of appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility. Interviews were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guidelines. Intervention effectiveness was measured via paired <i>t</i> tests of pre-/post-quantitative data on provider stigma completed by practitioners who attended the training. Ten sites successfully implemented IDEAS via external facilitation; 58 practitioners from nine sites completed pre- and post-surveys. Data showed significant decreases in stigma after the intervention. IDEAS, supported by external facilitation, is a feasible, acceptable, and appropriate means of reducing stigma among occupational therapy practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":47195,"journal":{"name":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","volume":" ","pages":"15394492241260022"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Hybrid Type III Analysis of a Filmed Story-Telling Intervention's Impact on Provider Stigma.\",\"authors\":\"Sally Wasmuth, Johnna Belkiewitz, Edward Miech, Chih-Ying Li, Alex Harris, Jocelyne Hernandez, Caitlin Horsford, Carlton Smith, Dawn Bravata\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15394492241260022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Identity Development Evolution and Sharing (IDEAS) reduces provider stigma, but few have been trained to implement IDEAS, highlighting a need for implementation strategies that facilitate uptake. We evaluated whether external facilitation successfully supported IDEAS implementation and whether IDEAS reduced provider stigma within and across sites irrespective of implementation barriers and facilitators. Key informants from 10 sites completed interviews and surveys of appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility. Interviews were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guidelines. Intervention effectiveness was measured via paired <i>t</i> tests of pre-/post-quantitative data on provider stigma completed by practitioners who attended the training. Ten sites successfully implemented IDEAS via external facilitation; 58 practitioners from nine sites completed pre- and post-surveys. Data showed significant decreases in stigma after the intervention. IDEAS, supported by external facilitation, is a feasible, acceptable, and appropriate means of reducing stigma among occupational therapy practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15394492241260022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492241260022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492241260022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

身份发展演变与共享(IDEAS)可减少医疗服务提供者的耻辱感,但很少有人接受过实施 IDEAS 的培训,这凸显了对促进吸收的实施策略的需求。我们评估了外部促进是否成功地支持了 IDEAS 的实施,以及 IDEAS 是否减少了医疗机构内部和医疗机构之间的污名化,而与实施障碍和促进因素无关。来自 10 个医疗点的主要信息提供者完成了访谈和适当性、可接受性和可行性调查。访谈采用实施研究综合框架指南进行分析。通过对参加培训的从业人员完成的关于提供者污名化的前后定量数据进行配对 t 检验来衡量干预效果。10 个医疗点通过外部协助成功实施了 IDEAS;来自 9 个医疗点的 58 名从业人员完成了前后调查。数据显示,干预后污名化现象明显减少。在外部促进的支持下,IDEAS 是减少职业治疗从业人员污名化的一种可行、可接受且适当的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Hybrid Type III Analysis of a Filmed Story-Telling Intervention's Impact on Provider Stigma.

Identity Development Evolution and Sharing (IDEAS) reduces provider stigma, but few have been trained to implement IDEAS, highlighting a need for implementation strategies that facilitate uptake. We evaluated whether external facilitation successfully supported IDEAS implementation and whether IDEAS reduced provider stigma within and across sites irrespective of implementation barriers and facilitators. Key informants from 10 sites completed interviews and surveys of appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility. Interviews were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guidelines. Intervention effectiveness was measured via paired t tests of pre-/post-quantitative data on provider stigma completed by practitioners who attended the training. Ten sites successfully implemented IDEAS via external facilitation; 58 practitioners from nine sites completed pre- and post-surveys. Data showed significant decreases in stigma after the intervention. IDEAS, supported by external facilitation, is a feasible, acceptable, and appropriate means of reducing stigma among occupational therapy practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The aim of OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health is to advance knowledge and science in occupational therapy and related fields, nationally and internationally, through the publication of scholarly literature and research. The journal publishes research that advances the understanding of occupation as it relates to participation and health.
期刊最新文献
Parenting With and Beyond Cancer: A Photo-Elicitation Study. A Mixed-Methods Examination of Lost Occupational Choice in Retirement. Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive): Investigating Construct Validity and Concordance of Australasian Data. Practitioner Perspectives on Occupation-Based Practice Across Varied Settings. Occupational Therapy Practitioners' Perceptions of Providing Services for the Acute Postpartum Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1