每个人都听说过它,但没人知道它是什么:关于患者对带状疱疹的理解和经历的定性研究。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-30 Print Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0025
Sophie Rees, Matthew Ridd, Lorelei Hunt, Hazel Everitt, Anna Gilbertson, Robert Johnson, Anthony E Pickering, Oliver van Hecke, Vikki Wylde, Sian Wells, Jonathan P Banks
{"title":"每个人都听说过它,但没人知道它是什么:关于患者对带状疱疹的理解和经历的定性研究。","authors":"Sophie Rees, Matthew Ridd, Lorelei Hunt, Hazel Everitt, Anna Gilbertson, Robert Johnson, Anthony E Pickering, Oliver van Hecke, Vikki Wylde, Sian Wells, Jonathan P Banks","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shingles (herpes zoster), caused by reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus, is usually diagnosed and managed in primary care. The lifetime risk of shingles in the general population is approximately 30%, and it can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. There has been little qualitative research about patient experience and understanding of shingles.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore patient experiences and understanding of shingles.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative interviews with people with shingles recruited from primary care in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured remote interviews were undertaken with 29 participants in a randomised controlled trial in primary care in England (ATHENA, ISRCTN14490832). Participants were aged >49 years and were diagnosed within 6 days of shingles rash onset. Interviewees were sampled for diversity in terms of pain, intervention adherence, age, gender, and ethnicity. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews took place in November 2022 to April 2023. Participants' understanding of shingles was limited, particularly pre-diagnosis. A common theme was that 'everyone has heard of it, but no one knows what it is'. Television campaigns about the shingles vaccination programme helped some to recognise the rash. Shingles was understood as a disease with a variable prognosis, resulting in a sense of uncertainty about the significance when diagnosed. Participants reported a range of symptoms, which impacted on everyday life. Some people thought their diagnosis was caused by poor mental health or challenging life circumstances, a perception sometimes reinforced by healthcare professionals. Many participants sought meaning in their diagnosis, reflecting on, and sometimes changing, their life and circumstances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care practitioners should be aware of the broad spectrum of patient knowledge, and the potential for better understanding to promote early attendance and treatment to reduce the impact of shingles.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e137-e142"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Everyone has heard of it, but no one knows what it is': a qualitative study of patient understandings and experiences of herpes zoster.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Rees, Matthew Ridd, Lorelei Hunt, Hazel Everitt, Anna Gilbertson, Robert Johnson, Anthony E Pickering, Oliver van Hecke, Vikki Wylde, Sian Wells, Jonathan P Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shingles (herpes zoster), caused by reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus, is usually diagnosed and managed in primary care. The lifetime risk of shingles in the general population is approximately 30%, and it can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. There has been little qualitative research about patient experience and understanding of shingles.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore patient experiences and understanding of shingles.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative interviews with people with shingles recruited from primary care in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured remote interviews were undertaken with 29 participants in a randomised controlled trial in primary care in England (ATHENA, ISRCTN14490832). Participants were aged >49 years and were diagnosed within 6 days of shingles rash onset. Interviewees were sampled for diversity in terms of pain, intervention adherence, age, gender, and ethnicity. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews took place in November 2022 to April 2023. Participants' understanding of shingles was limited, particularly pre-diagnosis. A common theme was that 'everyone has heard of it, but no one knows what it is'. Television campaigns about the shingles vaccination programme helped some to recognise the rash. Shingles was understood as a disease with a variable prognosis, resulting in a sense of uncertainty about the significance when diagnosed. Participants reported a range of symptoms, which impacted on everyday life. Some people thought their diagnosis was caused by poor mental health or challenging life circumstances, a perception sometimes reinforced by healthcare professionals. Many participants sought meaning in their diagnosis, reflecting on, and sometimes changing, their life and circumstances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care practitioners should be aware of the broad spectrum of patient knowledge, and the potential for better understanding to promote early attendance and treatment to reduce the impact of shingles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e137-e142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755566/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:带状疱疹(水痘-带状疱疹)是由水痘-带状疱疹病毒再活化引起的,通常在初级保健中进行诊断和治疗。一般人群一生中患带状疱疹的风险约为 30%,而且会对生活质量产生不利影响。关于带状疱疹的患者体验和理解的定性研究很少:设计与环境:对从英格兰初级医疗机构招募的患者进行定性访谈:对英格兰初级医疗随机对照试验(ATHENA,ISRCTN14490832)的 29 名参与者进行了半结构化远程定性访谈。参与者年龄大于 49 岁,并在带状疱疹出疹后六天内确诊。受访者在疼痛、干预依从性、年龄、性别和种族方面具有多样性。采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析:研究结果:受访者对带状疱疹的了解有限,尤其是在诊断前。有关带状疱疹疫苗接种计划的电视宣传有助于一些人识别皮疹。带状疱疹被认为是一种预后不稳定的疾病,因此在确诊时,人们对这种疾病的意义感到不确定。参与者报告了一系列影响日常生活的症状。有些人认为他们的诊断是由于精神健康不佳或具有挑战性的生活环境造成的,医疗保健专业人员有时会强化这种看法。许多参与者在诊断中寻找意义,反思并有时改变他们的生活和环境:结论:初级保健从业人员应了解患者的广泛知识,以及更好地理解促进早期就诊和治疗的潜力,以减少带状疱疹的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Everyone has heard of it, but no one knows what it is': a qualitative study of patient understandings and experiences of herpes zoster.

Background: Shingles (herpes zoster), caused by reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus, is usually diagnosed and managed in primary care. The lifetime risk of shingles in the general population is approximately 30%, and it can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. There has been little qualitative research about patient experience and understanding of shingles.

Aim: To explore patient experiences and understanding of shingles.

Design and setting: Qualitative interviews with people with shingles recruited from primary care in England.

Method: Qualitative semi-structured remote interviews were undertaken with 29 participants in a randomised controlled trial in primary care in England (ATHENA, ISRCTN14490832). Participants were aged >49 years and were diagnosed within 6 days of shingles rash onset. Interviewees were sampled for diversity in terms of pain, intervention adherence, age, gender, and ethnicity. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Interviews took place in November 2022 to April 2023. Participants' understanding of shingles was limited, particularly pre-diagnosis. A common theme was that 'everyone has heard of it, but no one knows what it is'. Television campaigns about the shingles vaccination programme helped some to recognise the rash. Shingles was understood as a disease with a variable prognosis, resulting in a sense of uncertainty about the significance when diagnosed. Participants reported a range of symptoms, which impacted on everyday life. Some people thought their diagnosis was caused by poor mental health or challenging life circumstances, a perception sometimes reinforced by healthcare professionals. Many participants sought meaning in their diagnosis, reflecting on, and sometimes changing, their life and circumstances.

Conclusion: Primary care practitioners should be aware of the broad spectrum of patient knowledge, and the potential for better understanding to promote early attendance and treatment to reduce the impact of shingles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing. Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Paramedic or GP consultations in primary care: prospective study comparing costs and outcomes. Exploring rural Scottish GPs' migration decisions: a secondary qualitative analysis considering burnout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1