高剂量率 192Ir 近距离放射治疗标准 BIPM.RI(I)-K8 与 VSL 和 BIPM 的参考空气灼烧率的关键比较

IF 2.1 3区工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Metrologia Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06010

C Kessler, B J Jansen, J A de Pooter, P Aviles Lucas

{"title":"高剂量率 192Ir 近距离放射治疗标准 BIPM.RI(I)-K8 与 VSL 和 BIPM 的参考空气灼烧率的关键比较","authors":"C Kessler, B J Jansen, J A de Pooter, P Aviles Lucas","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<title>Main text</title>A new key comparison of the standards for reference air kerma rate for <sup>192</sup>Ir high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy sources of the Dutch Metrology Institute (VSL), The Netherlands, and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out at the VSL in May 2019. The comparison result, based on the calibration coefficients for a transfer standard and expressed as a ratio of the VSL and the BIPM standards for reference air kerma rate, is 0.9926 with a combined standard uncertainty of 0.0055.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/bipm-ri-i-k8_vsl_2019\" xlink:type=\"simple\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K8 of high dose-rate 192Ir brachytherapy standards for reference air kerma rate of the VSL and the BIPM\",\"authors\":\"C Kessler, B J Jansen, J A de Pooter, P Aviles Lucas\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<title>Main text</title>A new key comparison of the standards for reference air kerma rate for <sup>192</sup>Ir high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy sources of the Dutch Metrology Institute (VSL), The Netherlands, and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out at the VSL in May 2019. The comparison result, based on the calibration coefficients for a transfer standard and expressed as a ratio of the VSL and the BIPM standards for reference air kerma rate, is 0.9926 with a combined standard uncertainty of 0.0055.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\\\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/bipm-ri-i-k8_vsl_2019\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\\\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).\",\"PeriodicalId\":18444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metrologia\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologia","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

正文 2019年5月，荷兰计量研究院（VSL）和国际计量局（BIPM）对192Ir高剂量率（HDR）近距离放射源的参考空气开玛率标准进行了新的关键比对。比对结果以转移标准的校准系数为基础，以 VSL 和 BIPM 标准的参考空气开尔玛率之比表示，为 0.9926，综合标准不确定度为 0.0055。要阅读本文正文，请点击最终报告。请注意，此文本为 BIPM 关键比对数据库附录 B 中的文本 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The 根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定，最终报告已通过同行评审，并批准由 CCRI 出版。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K8 of high dose-rate 192Ir brachytherapy standards for reference air kerma rate of the VSL and the BIPM

Main textA new key comparison of the standards for reference air kerma rate for ¹⁹²Ir high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy sources of the Dutch Metrology Institute (VSL), The Netherlands, and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out at the VSL in May 2019. The comparison result, based on the calibration coefficients for a transfer standard and expressed as a ratio of the VSL and the BIPM standards for reference air kerma rate, is 0.9926 with a combined standard uncertainty of 0.0055.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Metrologia 工程技术-物理：应用

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

25.00%

发文量

137

审稿时长

12 months

期刊介绍： Published 6 times per year, Metrologia covers the fundamentals of measurements, particularly those dealing with the seven base units of the International System of Units (metre, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, candela, mole) or proposals to replace them. The journal also publishes papers that contribute to the solution of difficult measurement problems and improve the accuracy of derived units and constants that are of fundamental importance to physics. In addition to regular papers, the journal publishes review articles, issues devoted to single topics of timely interest and occasional conference proceedings. Letters to the Editor and Short Communications (generally three pages or less) are also considered.