优化物种分布模型中的出现数据:样本大小、位置不确定性和取样偏差问题

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ecography Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07294
Vítězslav Moudrý, Manuele Bazzichetto, Ruben Remelgado, Rodolphe Devillers, Jonathan Lenoir, Rubén G. Mateo, Jonas J. Lembrechts, Neftalí Sillero, Vincent Lecours, Anna F. Cord, Vojtěch Barták, Petr Balej, Duccio Rocchini, Michele Torresani, Salvador Arenas-Castro, Matěj Man, Dominika Prajzlerová, Kateřina Gdulová, Jiří Prošek, Elisa Marchetto, Alejandra Zarzo-Arias, Lukáš Gábor, François Leroy, Matilde Martini, Marco Malavasi, Roberto Cazzolla Gatti, Jan Wild, Petra Šímová
{"title":"优化物种分布模型中的出现数据:样本大小、位置不确定性和取样偏差问题","authors":"Vítězslav Moudrý, Manuele Bazzichetto, Ruben Remelgado, Rodolphe Devillers, Jonathan Lenoir, Rubén G. Mateo, Jonas J. Lembrechts, Neftalí Sillero, Vincent Lecours, Anna F. Cord, Vojtěch Barták, Petr Balej, Duccio Rocchini, Michele Torresani, Salvador Arenas-Castro, Matěj Man, Dominika Prajzlerová, Kateřina Gdulová, Jiří Prošek, Elisa Marchetto, Alejandra Zarzo-Arias, Lukáš Gábor, François Leroy, Matilde Martini, Marco Malavasi, Roberto Cazzolla Gatti, Jan Wild, Petra Šímová","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Species distribution models (SDMs) have proven valuable in filling gaps in our knowledge of species occurrences. However, despite their broad applicability, SDMs exhibit critical shortcomings due to limitations in species occurrence data. These limitations include, in particular, issues related to sample size, positional uncertainty, and sampling bias. In addition, it is widely recognised that the quality of SDMs as well as the approaches used to mitigate the impact of the aforementioned data limitations depend on species ecology. While numerous studies have evaluated the effects of these data limitations on SDM performance, a synthesis of their results is lacking. However, without a comprehensive understanding of their individual and combined effects, our ability to predict the influence of these issues on the quality of modelled species–environment associations remains largely uncertain, limiting the value of model outputs. In this paper, we review studies that have evaluated the effects of sample size, positional uncertainty, sampling bias, and species ecology on SDMs outputs. We build upon their findings to provide recommendations for the critical assessment of species data intended for use in SDMs.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising occurrence data in species distribution models: sample size, positional uncertainty, and sampling bias matter\",\"authors\":\"Vítězslav Moudrý, Manuele Bazzichetto, Ruben Remelgado, Rodolphe Devillers, Jonathan Lenoir, Rubén G. Mateo, Jonas J. Lembrechts, Neftalí Sillero, Vincent Lecours, Anna F. Cord, Vojtěch Barták, Petr Balej, Duccio Rocchini, Michele Torresani, Salvador Arenas-Castro, Matěj Man, Dominika Prajzlerová, Kateřina Gdulová, Jiří Prošek, Elisa Marchetto, Alejandra Zarzo-Arias, Lukáš Gábor, François Leroy, Matilde Martini, Marco Malavasi, Roberto Cazzolla Gatti, Jan Wild, Petra Šímová\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecog.07294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Species distribution models (SDMs) have proven valuable in filling gaps in our knowledge of species occurrences. However, despite their broad applicability, SDMs exhibit critical shortcomings due to limitations in species occurrence data. These limitations include, in particular, issues related to sample size, positional uncertainty, and sampling bias. In addition, it is widely recognised that the quality of SDMs as well as the approaches used to mitigate the impact of the aforementioned data limitations depend on species ecology. While numerous studies have evaluated the effects of these data limitations on SDM performance, a synthesis of their results is lacking. However, without a comprehensive understanding of their individual and combined effects, our ability to predict the influence of these issues on the quality of modelled species–environment associations remains largely uncertain, limiting the value of model outputs. In this paper, we review studies that have evaluated the effects of sample size, positional uncertainty, sampling bias, and species ecology on SDMs outputs. We build upon their findings to provide recommendations for the critical assessment of species data intended for use in SDMs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07294\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07294","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物种分布模型(SDMs)已被证明在填补我们对物种出现的知识空白方面具有重要价值。然而,尽管 SDMs 具有广泛的适用性,但由于物种出现数据的局限性,SDMs 仍然存在严重的缺陷。这些局限性尤其包括与样本大小、位置不确定性和取样偏差有关的问题。此外,人们普遍认为,SDM 的质量以及用于减轻上述数据限制影响的方法取决于物种生态学。虽然已有大量研究评估了这些数据限制对 SDM 性能的影响,但缺乏对这些研究结果的综合分析。然而,如果不全面了解这些数据限制的单独和综合影响,我们预测这些问题对模型物种-环境关联质量的影响的能力在很大程度上仍不确定,从而限制了模型输出的价值。在本文中,我们回顾了评估样本大小、位置不确定性、取样偏差和物种生态学对 SDMs 输出影响的研究。在这些研究结果的基础上,我们提出了对拟用于 SDMs 的物种数据进行关键评估的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimising occurrence data in species distribution models: sample size, positional uncertainty, and sampling bias matter
Species distribution models (SDMs) have proven valuable in filling gaps in our knowledge of species occurrences. However, despite their broad applicability, SDMs exhibit critical shortcomings due to limitations in species occurrence data. These limitations include, in particular, issues related to sample size, positional uncertainty, and sampling bias. In addition, it is widely recognised that the quality of SDMs as well as the approaches used to mitigate the impact of the aforementioned data limitations depend on species ecology. While numerous studies have evaluated the effects of these data limitations on SDM performance, a synthesis of their results is lacking. However, without a comprehensive understanding of their individual and combined effects, our ability to predict the influence of these issues on the quality of modelled species–environment associations remains largely uncertain, limiting the value of model outputs. In this paper, we review studies that have evaluated the effects of sample size, positional uncertainty, sampling bias, and species ecology on SDMs outputs. We build upon their findings to provide recommendations for the critical assessment of species data intended for use in SDMs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
期刊最新文献
Colonization and extinction lags drive non-linear responses to warming in mountain plant communities across the Northern Hemisphere Differential predation patterns of free-ranging cats among continents Competitive interactions modify the direct effects of climate Achieving higher standards in species distribution modeling by leveraging the diversity of available software Seasonal macro-demography of North American bird populations revealed through participatory science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1