美国心力衰竭患者教育材料的可读性和可及性。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Failure Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.06.015
SONALI SHARMA BSc , ZARA LATIF MD , TRACY T. MAKUVIRE MD, MPH , CHRISTY N. TAYLOR , FABIAN VARGAS MD , NORA S. ABO-SIDO MD, MPH , NASRIEN E. IBRAHIM MD, MPH , ERSILIA M. DEFILIPPIS MD
{"title":"美国心力衰竭患者教育材料的可读性和可及性。","authors":"SONALI SHARMA BSc ,&nbsp;ZARA LATIF MD ,&nbsp;TRACY T. MAKUVIRE MD, MPH ,&nbsp;CHRISTY N. TAYLOR ,&nbsp;FABIAN VARGAS MD ,&nbsp;NORA S. ABO-SIDO MD, MPH ,&nbsp;NASRIEN E. IBRAHIM MD, MPH ,&nbsp;ERSILIA M. DEFILIPPIS MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online education materials are widely used by patients and caregivers to understand the management of complex chronic diseases such as heart failure (HF). Organizations such as the American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommend that materials be written at a 6th-grade reading level. The current study examined the readability and accessibility of online education materials for patients with HF. Whole page texts from each included website were entered into an online readability calculator. Five validated readability indices (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease Scale, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG Index)) were used to evaluate each source. Websites were categorized by source (government, public and private). The availability of audiovisual accessibility features and content in non-English languages were assessed for each website. Of the 36 online resources analyzed, the median readability level was 9th–10th grade according to the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and college level, according to the Flesch Reading Ease Scale. The Gunning Fog Index and Coleman-Liau Index both showed median readability scores corresponding to a 12th grade reading level, whereas the SMOG Index showed a median score corresponding to that of the 9th grade. Only 10 websites (28%) offered information in languages other than English, and none provided comprehensive accessibility features for users with disabilities. Common online educational materials for patients with HF are characterized by higher readability levels than those recommended by the National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association, and there were limited multilingual and accessibility options, potentially limiting the accessibility of resources to patients and caregivers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 154-157"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readability and Accessibility of Patient-Education Materials for Heart Failure in the United States\",\"authors\":\"SONALI SHARMA BSc ,&nbsp;ZARA LATIF MD ,&nbsp;TRACY T. MAKUVIRE MD, MPH ,&nbsp;CHRISTY N. TAYLOR ,&nbsp;FABIAN VARGAS MD ,&nbsp;NORA S. ABO-SIDO MD, MPH ,&nbsp;NASRIEN E. IBRAHIM MD, MPH ,&nbsp;ERSILIA M. DEFILIPPIS MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.06.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Online education materials are widely used by patients and caregivers to understand the management of complex chronic diseases such as heart failure (HF). Organizations such as the American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommend that materials be written at a 6th-grade reading level. The current study examined the readability and accessibility of online education materials for patients with HF. Whole page texts from each included website were entered into an online readability calculator. Five validated readability indices (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease Scale, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG Index)) were used to evaluate each source. Websites were categorized by source (government, public and private). The availability of audiovisual accessibility features and content in non-English languages were assessed for each website. Of the 36 online resources analyzed, the median readability level was 9th–10th grade according to the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and college level, according to the Flesch Reading Ease Scale. The Gunning Fog Index and Coleman-Liau Index both showed median readability scores corresponding to a 12th grade reading level, whereas the SMOG Index showed a median score corresponding to that of the 9th grade. Only 10 websites (28%) offered information in languages other than English, and none provided comprehensive accessibility features for users with disabilities. Common online educational materials for patients with HF are characterized by higher readability levels than those recommended by the National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association, and there were limited multilingual and accessibility options, potentially limiting the accessibility of resources to patients and caregivers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 154-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916424002641\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916424002641","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者和护理人员广泛使用在线教育材料来了解复杂慢性疾病(如心力衰竭)的治疗。美国医学会和美国国立卫生研究院等组织建议,教材应按照六年级的阅读水平编写。本研究考察了针对心力衰竭患者的在线教育材料的可读性和易读性。将每个网站的整页文字输入在线可读性计算器。五种经过验证的可读性指数(Flesch-Kincaid 分级、Flesch 阅读容易程度量表、Gunning Fog 指数、Coleman-Liau 指数和 Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG Index))用于评估每种资料来源。网站按来源分类(政府、公共和私营)。对每个网站的视听无障碍功能和非英语语言内容的可用性进行了评估。在分析的 36 个在线资源中,根据 Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平,可读性水平的中位数为 9-10 年级,根据 Flesch 阅读容易程度量表,可读性水平的中位数为大学水平。Gunning Fog 指数和 Coleman-Liau 指数都显示了与 12 年级阅读水平相对应的可读性中位数,而 SMOG 指数显示了与 9 年级阅读水平相对应的中位数。只有 10 个网站(28%)用英语以外的语言提供信息,没有一个网站为残疾用户提供全面的无障碍功能。针对高血脂患者的常见在线教育材料的可读性水平高于美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学会推荐的水平,且多语种和无障碍选项有限,这可能会限制患者和护理人员获得资源的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Readability and Accessibility of Patient-Education Materials for Heart Failure in the United States
Online education materials are widely used by patients and caregivers to understand the management of complex chronic diseases such as heart failure (HF). Organizations such as the American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommend that materials be written at a 6th-grade reading level. The current study examined the readability and accessibility of online education materials for patients with HF. Whole page texts from each included website were entered into an online readability calculator. Five validated readability indices (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease Scale, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG Index)) were used to evaluate each source. Websites were categorized by source (government, public and private). The availability of audiovisual accessibility features and content in non-English languages were assessed for each website. Of the 36 online resources analyzed, the median readability level was 9th–10th grade according to the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and college level, according to the Flesch Reading Ease Scale. The Gunning Fog Index and Coleman-Liau Index both showed median readability scores corresponding to a 12th grade reading level, whereas the SMOG Index showed a median score corresponding to that of the 9th grade. Only 10 websites (28%) offered information in languages other than English, and none provided comprehensive accessibility features for users with disabilities. Common online educational materials for patients with HF are characterized by higher readability levels than those recommended by the National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association, and there were limited multilingual and accessibility options, potentially limiting the accessibility of resources to patients and caregivers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating incident Atrial Fibrillation and incident Heart Failure as time-varying covariates for Time to Event Analysis among adults 55 years and older in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Similar Goals, Divergent Paths: Exploring Approaches Towards Hepatitis C Treatment Protocols in Heart Transplantation. Enhancing Sweat Rate for In-Hospital and Home-Based Decongestive Therapy. Prediction and Longer-Term Outcomes of All-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in the HEART-FID Trial. The Role of Lactate Metabolism in Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Insights and Therapeutic Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1