使用 CPLEX 优化器在 PP 的基荷内混合使用核电机组和常规化石燃料机组

IF 2.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Frontiers in Energy Research Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.3389/fenrg.2024.1400905
Abdullah M. Al-Qahtani, Abdullah M. Al-Shaalan, Waheed A. Al-Masry, Hassan M. Hussein Farh
{"title":"使用 CPLEX 优化器在 PP 的基荷内混合使用核电机组和常规化石燃料机组","authors":"Abdullah M. Al-Qahtani, Abdullah M. Al-Shaalan, Waheed A. Al-Masry, Hassan M. Hussein Farh","doi":"10.3389/fenrg.2024.1400905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The future electric loads in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) are increasing significantly, particularly in the Eastern Province of the KSA. These high-rise loads are primarily driven by the operational needs of the Saudi Arabian oil company Aramco, including oil refineries, and the infrastructures of the Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) factories. This study aims to construct a nuclear power plant in that area to supplement and support the baseload currently covered by conventional generation units powered by fossil fuels within the Saudi Electricity Company (SEC) operations. The objective function is to minimize the operational costs of the power systems to the greatest extent possible. This paper describes a case study conducted using the IBM CPLEX Optimizer software to compare the operational costs of KSA’s power systems for a 24-h period. Two scenarios were considered and addressed: the first scenario without the inclusion of a nuclear power plant (NPP) and the second scenario with the inclusion of the NPP. The unit commitment problem was modeled for both scenarios. The obtained results revealed that the second scenario, which involved the penetration of the NPP, offered an optimal economic solution for operating KSA’s power systems. By employing the CPLEX Optimizer software and analyzing the unit commitment problem, this study provides valuable insights into the economic advantages of integrating the NPP into the power systems of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The NPP shows viability in terms of minimizing the operational costs to 32.10 $/MWh compared to the first scenario where the operational costs were 42.10 $/MWh and resulted in almost 24% reduction in operational costs. In addition, the NPP is deemed as an optimal technology to contribute to the net zero goal by 2060, where it can reduce the reliance on fossil fuel power plants and contribute to the reduction of CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions.","PeriodicalId":12428,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Energy Research","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixing nuclear and conventional fossil fuel units within the baseload of PP using the CPLEX Optimizer\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah M. Al-Qahtani, Abdullah M. Al-Shaalan, Waheed A. Al-Masry, Hassan M. Hussein Farh\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fenrg.2024.1400905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The future electric loads in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) are increasing significantly, particularly in the Eastern Province of the KSA. These high-rise loads are primarily driven by the operational needs of the Saudi Arabian oil company Aramco, including oil refineries, and the infrastructures of the Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) factories. This study aims to construct a nuclear power plant in that area to supplement and support the baseload currently covered by conventional generation units powered by fossil fuels within the Saudi Electricity Company (SEC) operations. The objective function is to minimize the operational costs of the power systems to the greatest extent possible. This paper describes a case study conducted using the IBM CPLEX Optimizer software to compare the operational costs of KSA’s power systems for a 24-h period. Two scenarios were considered and addressed: the first scenario without the inclusion of a nuclear power plant (NPP) and the second scenario with the inclusion of the NPP. The unit commitment problem was modeled for both scenarios. The obtained results revealed that the second scenario, which involved the penetration of the NPP, offered an optimal economic solution for operating KSA’s power systems. By employing the CPLEX Optimizer software and analyzing the unit commitment problem, this study provides valuable insights into the economic advantages of integrating the NPP into the power systems of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The NPP shows viability in terms of minimizing the operational costs to 32.10 $/MWh compared to the first scenario where the operational costs were 42.10 $/MWh and resulted in almost 24% reduction in operational costs. In addition, the NPP is deemed as an optimal technology to contribute to the net zero goal by 2060, where it can reduce the reliance on fossil fuel power plants and contribute to the reduction of CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Energy Research\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Energy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1400905\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1400905","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)未来的电力负荷将大幅增加,尤其是在沙特阿拉伯东部省份。这些高层负荷主要由沙特阿拉伯石油公司阿美石油公司(包括炼油厂)的运营需求和沙特基础工业公司(SABIC)工厂的基础设施所驱动。本研究的目的是在该地区建造一座核电站,以补充和支持沙特电力公司(SEC)运营范围内目前由化石燃料驱动的常规发电机组所提供的基荷。目标函数是最大限度地降低电力系统的运营成本。本文介绍了一项使用 IBM CPLEX 优化器软件进行的案例研究,该软件用于比较沙特电力公司电力系统在 24 小时内的运营成本。本文考虑并讨论了两种情况:第一种情况是不包括核电站,第二种情况是包括核电站。对这两种情况都进行了机组承诺问题建模。结果表明,第二种方案涉及核电厂的渗透,为运行 KSA 的电力系统提供了最佳经济解决方案。通过使用 CPLEX 优化器软件和分析机组承诺问题,本研究为将核电厂纳入沙特阿拉伯王国电力系统的经济优势提供了有价值的见解。与第一种方案(运营成本为 42.10 美元/兆瓦时)相比,该核电厂在将运营成本降至 32.10 美元/兆瓦时方面显示出可行性,并使运营成本降低了近 24%。此外,核电厂被认为是有助于实现 2060 年净零目标的最佳技术,它可以减少对化石燃料发电厂的依赖,并有助于减少二氧化碳排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mixing nuclear and conventional fossil fuel units within the baseload of PP using the CPLEX Optimizer
The future electric loads in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) are increasing significantly, particularly in the Eastern Province of the KSA. These high-rise loads are primarily driven by the operational needs of the Saudi Arabian oil company Aramco, including oil refineries, and the infrastructures of the Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) factories. This study aims to construct a nuclear power plant in that area to supplement and support the baseload currently covered by conventional generation units powered by fossil fuels within the Saudi Electricity Company (SEC) operations. The objective function is to minimize the operational costs of the power systems to the greatest extent possible. This paper describes a case study conducted using the IBM CPLEX Optimizer software to compare the operational costs of KSA’s power systems for a 24-h period. Two scenarios were considered and addressed: the first scenario without the inclusion of a nuclear power plant (NPP) and the second scenario with the inclusion of the NPP. The unit commitment problem was modeled for both scenarios. The obtained results revealed that the second scenario, which involved the penetration of the NPP, offered an optimal economic solution for operating KSA’s power systems. By employing the CPLEX Optimizer software and analyzing the unit commitment problem, this study provides valuable insights into the economic advantages of integrating the NPP into the power systems of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The NPP shows viability in terms of minimizing the operational costs to 32.10 $/MWh compared to the first scenario where the operational costs were 42.10 $/MWh and resulted in almost 24% reduction in operational costs. In addition, the NPP is deemed as an optimal technology to contribute to the net zero goal by 2060, where it can reduce the reliance on fossil fuel power plants and contribute to the reduction of CO2 emissions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Energy Research
Frontiers in Energy Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
1727
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Energy Research makes use of the unique Frontiers platform for open-access publishing and research networking for scientists, which provides an equal opportunity to seek, share and create knowledge. The mission of Frontiers is to place publishing back in the hands of working scientists and to promote an interactive, fair, and efficient review process. Articles are peer-reviewed according to the Frontiers review guidelines, which evaluate manuscripts on objective editorial criteria
期刊最新文献
Grid-integrated solutions for sustainable EV charging: a comparative study of renewable energy and battery storage systems Research on the impact of digitalization on energy companies’ green transition: new insights from China Multi-objective-based economic and emission dispatch with integration of wind energy sources using different optimization algorithms Demand-side management scenario analysis for the energy-efficient future of Pakistan: Bridging the gap between market interests and national priorities Modeling and scheduling of utility-scale energy storage toward high-share renewable coordination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1