成人人工耳蜗用户的远程自我测试:无线流媒体对噪音中语音识别的影响。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2382201
Jasmijn M Rootlieb, Sigrid Polspoel, Patrick Brienesse, Cas Smits
{"title":"成人人工耳蜗用户的远程自我测试:无线流媒体对噪音中语音识别的影响。","authors":"Jasmijn M Rootlieb, Sigrid Polspoel, Patrick Brienesse, Cas Smits","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2382201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Wireless sound transfer methods for cochlear implant sound processors have become popular for remote self-assessed hearing tests. The aim of this study was to determine (1) spectral differences in stimuli between different wireless sound transfer options and (2) the effect on outcomes of speech recognition tests in noise.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In study 1, the frequency response of different streaming options (Phonak Roger Select, Cochlear Mini Mic 2+, telecoil and Bluetooth connection) was measured by connecting headphones to CI sound processors. Study 2 followed a repeated measures design in which digits-in-noise (DIN) tests were performed using wireless streaming to sound processors from Cochlear, Advanced Bionics, and MED-EL.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>20 normal hearing participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in frequency response between loudspeaker and wireless streaming conditions were minimal. We did not find significant difference in DIN outcome (F<sub>4,194</sub> = 1.062, p = 0.376) between the wireless transfer options with the Cochlear Nucleus 7 processor. No significant difference in DIN outcomes was found between Bluetooth streaming and the loudspeaker condition for all of the three tested brands. The mean standard error of measurement was 0.72 dB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences in DIN test outcomes between wireless sound transfer and the reference method were found.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote self-testing for adult cochlear implant users: the effect of wireless streaming on speech recognition in noise.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmijn M Rootlieb, Sigrid Polspoel, Patrick Brienesse, Cas Smits\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2024.2382201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Wireless sound transfer methods for cochlear implant sound processors have become popular for remote self-assessed hearing tests. The aim of this study was to determine (1) spectral differences in stimuli between different wireless sound transfer options and (2) the effect on outcomes of speech recognition tests in noise.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In study 1, the frequency response of different streaming options (Phonak Roger Select, Cochlear Mini Mic 2+, telecoil and Bluetooth connection) was measured by connecting headphones to CI sound processors. Study 2 followed a repeated measures design in which digits-in-noise (DIN) tests were performed using wireless streaming to sound processors from Cochlear, Advanced Bionics, and MED-EL.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>20 normal hearing participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in frequency response between loudspeaker and wireless streaming conditions were minimal. We did not find significant difference in DIN outcome (F<sub>4,194</sub> = 1.062, p = 0.376) between the wireless transfer options with the Cochlear Nucleus 7 processor. No significant difference in DIN outcomes was found between Bluetooth streaming and the loudspeaker condition for all of the three tested brands. The mean standard error of measurement was 0.72 dB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences in DIN test outcomes between wireless sound transfer and the reference method were found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2382201\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2382201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:用于人工耳蜗声音处理器的无线声音传输方法已成为远程听力自测的流行方法。本研究的目的是确定:(1)不同无线声音传输选项之间刺激的频谱差异;(2)对噪声中语音识别测试结果的影响:在研究 1 中,通过将耳机连接到 CI 声音处理器,测量了不同流媒体选项(峰力 Roger Select、科利耳 Mini Mic 2+、远距线圈和蓝牙连接)的频率响应。研究 2 采用重复测量设计,使用科利耳、Advanced Bionics 和 MED-EL 的声音处理器无线串流进行噪声中数字(DIN)测试:结果:扬声器和无线串流条件下的频率响应差异很小。我们没有发现使用 Cochlear Nucleus 7 处理器的无线传输选项在 DIN 结果上有明显差异(F4,194 = 1.062,p = 0.376)。在所有三种测试品牌中,蓝牙串流和扬声器条件下的 DIN 结果均无明显差异。测量的平均标准误差为 0.72 dB:结论:无线声音传输与参考方法的 DIN 测试结果无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remote self-testing for adult cochlear implant users: the effect of wireless streaming on speech recognition in noise.

Objectives: Wireless sound transfer methods for cochlear implant sound processors have become popular for remote self-assessed hearing tests. The aim of this study was to determine (1) spectral differences in stimuli between different wireless sound transfer options and (2) the effect on outcomes of speech recognition tests in noise.

Design: In study 1, the frequency response of different streaming options (Phonak Roger Select, Cochlear Mini Mic 2+, telecoil and Bluetooth connection) was measured by connecting headphones to CI sound processors. Study 2 followed a repeated measures design in which digits-in-noise (DIN) tests were performed using wireless streaming to sound processors from Cochlear, Advanced Bionics, and MED-EL.

Study sample: 20 normal hearing participants.

Results: Differences in frequency response between loudspeaker and wireless streaming conditions were minimal. We did not find significant difference in DIN outcome (F4,194 = 1.062, p = 0.376) between the wireless transfer options with the Cochlear Nucleus 7 processor. No significant difference in DIN outcomes was found between Bluetooth streaming and the loudspeaker condition for all of the three tested brands. The mean standard error of measurement was 0.72 dB.

Conclusions: No significant differences in DIN test outcomes between wireless sound transfer and the reference method were found.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
The influence of age and hearing loss on thresholds measured using the TFS-AF test. Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing. "Can physical activity reduce the risk of having tinnitus?" Risky leisure noise exposure during the transition to adulthood and the impact of major life events - results of the OHRKAN cohort study. Applications of automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies for hearing assessment: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1