患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的黎巴嫩成年人疼痛恢复能力量表阿拉伯语版的心理计量特性。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/7361038
Melissa Makhoul, Samar Noureddine, Huda Abu-Saad Huijer, Laila Farhood, Souha Fares, Imad Uthman, Douglas J French, Christopher R France
{"title":"患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的黎巴嫩成年人疼痛恢复能力量表阿拉伯语版的心理计量特性。","authors":"Melissa Makhoul, Samar Noureddine, Huda Abu-Saad Huijer, Laila Farhood, Souha Fares, Imad Uthman, Douglas J French, Christopher R France","doi":"10.1155/2024/7361038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pain Resilience Scale (PRS), which measures behavioral perseverance and the ability to regulate emotions and cognition despite ongoing pain, lacks an Arabic version.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate an Arabic version of the Pain Resilience Scale (PRS-A) among Lebanese adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase 1 involved translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PRS into Arabic. Phase 2 examined the reliability and validity of the PRS-A. A convenience sample of 154 Lebanese adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain completed the PRS-A and self-report measures of pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy, pain intensity and interference, depression and anxiety, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PRS-A yielded a two-factor structure with factor 1 representing \"cognitive/affective positivity\" and factor 2 representing \"behavioral perseverance,\" accounting for 41.93% and 15.15% of the variance in pain resilience, respectively. Total PRS-A score (<i>M</i> = 33.20 and SD = 9.90) showed significant correlations with pain catastrophizing (<i>M</i> = 27.65, SD = 13.03, and <i>r</i> = -0.52), pain self-efficacy (median = 9.00, IQR = 4, and rho = 0.61), pain intensity (<i>M</i> = 4.50, SD = 2.25, and <i>r</i> = -0.28), pain interference (<i>M</i> = 4.30, SD = 2.89, and <i>r</i> = -0.56), physical (<i>M</i> = 34.95, SD = 9.52, and <i>r</i> = 0.34) and mental (<i>M</i> = 40.08, SD = 12.49, and <i>r</i> = 0.58) health functioning, anxiety (median = 7.00, IQR = 7, and rho = -0.57), and depression (median = 4.00, IQR = 6, and rho = -0.58). PRS-A subscale was also significantly related to all measures except pain intensity, which was correlated with cognitive/affective positivity (<i>r</i> = -0.33) but not behavioral perseverance (<i>r</i> = -0.09). Cronbach's alpha for the PRS-A was 0.87.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PRS-A demonstrated validity and acceptable reliability among Arab-speaking individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain, suggesting its potential utility for assessing pain resilience within this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Pain Resilience Scale among Lebanese Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Makhoul, Samar Noureddine, Huda Abu-Saad Huijer, Laila Farhood, Souha Fares, Imad Uthman, Douglas J French, Christopher R France\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/7361038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pain Resilience Scale (PRS), which measures behavioral perseverance and the ability to regulate emotions and cognition despite ongoing pain, lacks an Arabic version.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate an Arabic version of the Pain Resilience Scale (PRS-A) among Lebanese adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase 1 involved translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PRS into Arabic. Phase 2 examined the reliability and validity of the PRS-A. A convenience sample of 154 Lebanese adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain completed the PRS-A and self-report measures of pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy, pain intensity and interference, depression and anxiety, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PRS-A yielded a two-factor structure with factor 1 representing \\\"cognitive/affective positivity\\\" and factor 2 representing \\\"behavioral perseverance,\\\" accounting for 41.93% and 15.15% of the variance in pain resilience, respectively. Total PRS-A score (<i>M</i> = 33.20 and SD = 9.90) showed significant correlations with pain catastrophizing (<i>M</i> = 27.65, SD = 13.03, and <i>r</i> = -0.52), pain self-efficacy (median = 9.00, IQR = 4, and rho = 0.61), pain intensity (<i>M</i> = 4.50, SD = 2.25, and <i>r</i> = -0.28), pain interference (<i>M</i> = 4.30, SD = 2.89, and <i>r</i> = -0.56), physical (<i>M</i> = 34.95, SD = 9.52, and <i>r</i> = 0.34) and mental (<i>M</i> = 40.08, SD = 12.49, and <i>r</i> = 0.58) health functioning, anxiety (median = 7.00, IQR = 7, and rho = -0.57), and depression (median = 4.00, IQR = 6, and rho = -0.58). PRS-A subscale was also significantly related to all measures except pain intensity, which was correlated with cognitive/affective positivity (<i>r</i> = -0.33) but not behavioral perseverance (<i>r</i> = -0.09). Cronbach's alpha for the PRS-A was 0.87.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PRS-A demonstrated validity and acceptable reliability among Arab-speaking individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain, suggesting its potential utility for assessing pain resilience within this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300090/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7361038\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7361038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛恢复力量表(PRS)用于测量在持续疼痛情况下的行为毅力以及调节情绪和认知的能力:疼痛恢复力量表(PRS)用于测量在持续疼痛的情况下的行为毅力以及调节情绪和认知的能力,但该量表缺乏阿拉伯语版本:本研究旨在翻译阿拉伯语版疼痛恢复力量表(PRS-A),对其进行文化适应性调整,并在黎巴嫩成年人中进行验证:方法:第一阶段包括将 PRS 翻译成阿拉伯语并进行跨文化改编。第二阶段对 PRS-A 的信度和效度进行了检验。154 名患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的黎巴嫩成年人完成了 PRS-A 和疼痛灾难化、疼痛自我效能感、疼痛强度和干扰、抑郁和焦虑以及生活质量的自我报告测量:PRS-A产生了双因子结构,因子1代表 "认知/情感积极性",因子2代表 "行为毅力",分别占疼痛恢复力变异的41.93%和15.15%。PRS-A 总分(M = 33.20,SD = 9.90)与疼痛灾难化(M = 27.65,SD = 13.03,r = -0.52)、疼痛自我效能(中位数 = 9.00,IQR = 4,rho = 0.61)、疼痛强度(M = 4.50,SD = 2.25,r = -0.28)、疼痛干扰(M = 4.30,SD = 2.89,r = -0.56)、身体(M = 34.95,SD = 9.52,r = 0.34)和心理(M = 40.08,SD = 12.49,r = 0.58)健康功能、焦虑(中位数 = 7.00,IQR = 7,rho = -0.57)和抑郁(中位数 = 4.00,IQR = 6,rho = -0.58)。PRS-A 子量表与所有测量指标都有显著相关性,但疼痛强度除外,疼痛强度与认知/情感积极性相关(r = -0.33),但与行为毅力无关(r = -0.09)。PRS-A的Cronbach's alpha为0.87:PRS-A在讲阿拉伯语的慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者中表现出有效性和可接受的可靠性,表明它在评估该人群的疼痛恢复能力方面具有潜在的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Pain Resilience Scale among Lebanese Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

Background: The Pain Resilience Scale (PRS), which measures behavioral perseverance and the ability to regulate emotions and cognition despite ongoing pain, lacks an Arabic version.

Objectives: This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate an Arabic version of the Pain Resilience Scale (PRS-A) among Lebanese adults.

Methods: Phase 1 involved translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PRS into Arabic. Phase 2 examined the reliability and validity of the PRS-A. A convenience sample of 154 Lebanese adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain completed the PRS-A and self-report measures of pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy, pain intensity and interference, depression and anxiety, and quality of life.

Results: The PRS-A yielded a two-factor structure with factor 1 representing "cognitive/affective positivity" and factor 2 representing "behavioral perseverance," accounting for 41.93% and 15.15% of the variance in pain resilience, respectively. Total PRS-A score (M = 33.20 and SD = 9.90) showed significant correlations with pain catastrophizing (M = 27.65, SD = 13.03, and r = -0.52), pain self-efficacy (median = 9.00, IQR = 4, and rho = 0.61), pain intensity (M = 4.50, SD = 2.25, and r = -0.28), pain interference (M = 4.30, SD = 2.89, and r = -0.56), physical (M = 34.95, SD = 9.52, and r = 0.34) and mental (M = 40.08, SD = 12.49, and r = 0.58) health functioning, anxiety (median = 7.00, IQR = 7, and rho = -0.57), and depression (median = 4.00, IQR = 6, and rho = -0.58). PRS-A subscale was also significantly related to all measures except pain intensity, which was correlated with cognitive/affective positivity (r = -0.33) but not behavioral perseverance (r = -0.09). Cronbach's alpha for the PRS-A was 0.87.

Conclusion: The PRS-A demonstrated validity and acceptable reliability among Arab-speaking individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain, suggesting its potential utility for assessing pain resilience within this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring Everyday Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Secondary, Retrospective Analysis from ncRNAPain. Assessment of Clinical Analgesic Levels and Serum Biomarkers in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Diclofenac and Methotrexate Combined Therapy with Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy. Potential S1 Nerve Root Blocks Associated with Sacroiliac Joint Injections. Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Pain Resilience Scale among Lebanese Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Exploring the Analgesic Initiation Mechanism of Tuina in the Dorsal Root Ganglion of Minor CCI Rats via the TRPV1/TRPA1-cGMP Pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1