对接受化疗免疫疗法的广泛期小细胞肺癌患者进行 G-CSF 预防治疗的有效性和安全性。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-11 DOI:10.1080/14656566.2024.2391007
Yusuf Ilhan, Gokhan Ucar, Mehmet Nuri Baser, Halil Goksel Guzel, Safa Can Efil, Bilgin Demir, Duygu Ercan Uzundal, Tuba Karacelik, Nadiye Sever, Onur Yazdan Balcik, Hayati Arvas, Ibrahim Karadag, Ahmet Kadioglu, Ömer Burak Ekinci, Cengiz Karacin, Zuhat Urakci, Osman Kostek, Melek Karakurt Eryilmaz, Ozan Yazici, Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur, Banu Ozturk, Dogan Uncu, Yakup Ergun
{"title":"对接受化疗免疫疗法的广泛期小细胞肺癌患者进行 G-CSF 预防治疗的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Yusuf Ilhan, Gokhan Ucar, Mehmet Nuri Baser, Halil Goksel Guzel, Safa Can Efil, Bilgin Demir, Duygu Ercan Uzundal, Tuba Karacelik, Nadiye Sever, Onur Yazdan Balcik, Hayati Arvas, Ibrahim Karadag, Ahmet Kadioglu, Ömer Burak Ekinci, Cengiz Karacin, Zuhat Urakci, Osman Kostek, Melek Karakurt Eryilmaz, Ozan Yazici, Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur, Banu Ozturk, Dogan Uncu, Yakup Ergun","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2391007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis during chemoimmunotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled ES-SCLC patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab, categorized into G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups. Demographic and disease-related data were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 119 patients (median age: 63 years), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 72.3% and 81.5%, respectively. In the G-CSF group, the ORR was 76.4% compared to 60.0% in the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.33), and the DCR was 85.4% versus 70.0%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.46). Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.8) in the G-CSF group and 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.5) in the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.24). Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-18.1) for the G-CSF group and 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.3) for the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.47). Grade 3 ≥ adverse events were similar between groups (49.4% vs. 33.3%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>G-CSF prophylaxis can be safely used in ES-SCLC patients undergoing carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab regimen without significantly altering efficacy or increasing toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Ilhan, Gokhan Ucar, Mehmet Nuri Baser, Halil Goksel Guzel, Safa Can Efil, Bilgin Demir, Duygu Ercan Uzundal, Tuba Karacelik, Nadiye Sever, Onur Yazdan Balcik, Hayati Arvas, Ibrahim Karadag, Ahmet Kadioglu, Ömer Burak Ekinci, Cengiz Karacin, Zuhat Urakci, Osman Kostek, Melek Karakurt Eryilmaz, Ozan Yazici, Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur, Banu Ozturk, Dogan Uncu, Yakup Ergun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14656566.2024.2391007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis during chemoimmunotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled ES-SCLC patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab, categorized into G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups. Demographic and disease-related data were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 119 patients (median age: 63 years), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 72.3% and 81.5%, respectively. In the G-CSF group, the ORR was 76.4% compared to 60.0% in the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.33), and the DCR was 85.4% versus 70.0%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.46). Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.8) in the G-CSF group and 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.5) in the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.24). Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-18.1) for the G-CSF group and 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.3) for the non-G-CSF group (<i>p</i> = 0.47). Grade 3 ≥ adverse events were similar between groups (49.4% vs. 33.3%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>G-CSF prophylaxis can be safely used in ES-SCLC patients undergoing carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab regimen without significantly altering efficacy or increasing toxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2391007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2391007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的我们旨在评估广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者在接受卡铂+依托泊苷和阿特珠单抗化疗免疫治疗期间预防粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的有效性和安全性:这项多中心回顾性研究招募了接受卡铂+依托泊苷和阿特珠单抗治疗的ES-SCLC患者,分为G-CSF组和非G-CSF组。研究收集了人口统计学和疾病相关数据。对反应率、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和毒性进行了分析:119名患者(中位年龄:63岁)中,总反应率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为72.3%和81.5%。G-CSF组的ORR为76.4%,而非G-CSF组为60.0%(P = 0.33);DCR为85.4%,而非G-CSF组为70.0%(P = 0.46)。G-CSF 组的中位 PFS 为 8.3 个月(95% CI,6.8-9.8),非 G-CSF 组为 6.8 个月(95% CI,6.2-7.5)(p = 0.24)。G-CSF组的中位OS为13.8个月(95% CI,9.6-18.1),非G-CSF组为10.6个月(95% CI,7.9-13.3)(P = 0.47)。两组的3级≥不良事件发生率相似(分别为49.4%对33.3%,p = 0.12):结论:接受卡铂+依托泊苷+阿特珠单抗方案治疗的ES-SCLC患者可安全使用G-CSF预防,且不会明显改变疗效或增加毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis during chemoimmunotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled ES-SCLC patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab, categorized into G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups. Demographic and disease-related data were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.

Results: Of 119 patients (median age: 63 years), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 72.3% and 81.5%, respectively. In the G-CSF group, the ORR was 76.4% compared to 60.0% in the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.33), and the DCR was 85.4% versus 70.0%, respectively (p = 0.46). Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.8) in the G-CSF group and 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.5) in the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.24). Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-18.1) for the G-CSF group and 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.3) for the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.47). Grade 3 ≥ adverse events were similar between groups (49.4% vs. 33.3%, respectively, p = 0.12).

Conclusion: G-CSF prophylaxis can be safely used in ES-SCLC patients undergoing carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab regimen without significantly altering efficacy or increasing toxicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Vonoprazan for the treatment of erosive GERD and heartburn associated with GERD in adults. Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Reassessing the role of aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease. Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of anorexia nervosa - novel targets to break a vicious cycle. Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the management of erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes and pre-diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1