电刺激和生物反馈疗法对产后盆腔器官脱垂的临床效果和预后因素。

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2024-07-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0421en
Hongjin Wu, Xiaoying Zhong, Linqian He, Xixi Li, Yan Zeng, Yuanli Jia
{"title":"电刺激和生物反馈疗法对产后盆腔器官脱垂的临床效果和预后因素。","authors":"Hongjin Wu, Xiaoying Zhong, Linqian He, Xixi Li, Yan Zeng, Yuanli Jia","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0421en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effects of electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy in patients with postpartum pelvic organ prolapse and to identify factors that can affect therapeutic efficacy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective study analysed clinical data about patients with postpartum pelvic organ prolapse. A total of 328 women with pelvic organ prolapse at 6 weeks postpartum were recruited from one tertiary hospitals in Sichuan province in China, between March 2019 and March 2022. The prognostic factors of therapeutic efficacy were analysed using logistic regression and decision tree model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 259 women showed clinical benefits from the treatment. The logistic regression model showed that parity, pelvic floor muscle training at home, and the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment were independent prognostic factors. The decision tree model showed that the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment was the main prognostic factor, followed by parity. There was no significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between the two models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parity, pelvic floor muscle training at home, and the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment were important prognostic factors of electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"58 ","pages":"e20230421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical effect and prognostic factor of electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse.\",\"authors\":\"Hongjin Wu, Xiaoying Zhong, Linqian He, Xixi Li, Yan Zeng, Yuanli Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0421en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effects of electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy in patients with postpartum pelvic organ prolapse and to identify factors that can affect therapeutic efficacy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective study analysed clinical data about patients with postpartum pelvic organ prolapse. A total of 328 women with pelvic organ prolapse at 6 weeks postpartum were recruited from one tertiary hospitals in Sichuan province in China, between March 2019 and March 2022. The prognostic factors of therapeutic efficacy were analysed using logistic regression and decision tree model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 259 women showed clinical benefits from the treatment. The logistic regression model showed that parity, pelvic floor muscle training at home, and the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment were independent prognostic factors. The decision tree model showed that the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment was the main prognostic factor, followed by parity. There was no significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between the two models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parity, pelvic floor muscle training at home, and the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment were important prognostic factors of electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"e20230421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308478/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0421en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0421en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨电刺激和生物反馈疗法对产后盆腔器官脱垂患者的影响,并找出影响疗效的因素:这项回顾性研究分析了产后盆腔器官脱垂患者的临床数据。在2019年3月至2022年3月期间,从中国四川省的一家三甲医院共招募了328名产后6周的盆腔器官脱垂妇女。采用逻辑回归和决策树模型分析疗效的预后因素:结果:总体而言,259 名妇女从治疗中获得了临床益处。逻辑回归模型显示,奇偶数、在家进行的盆底肌肉训练和治疗前的盆腔器官脱垂量化分期是独立的预后因素。决策树模型显示,治疗前的盆腔器官脱垂量化阶段是主要的预后因素,其次是奇偶性。两种模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积无明显差异:结论:胎次、在家进行的盆底肌肉训练和治疗前的盆腔器官脱垂量化阶段是电刺激和生物反馈疗法治疗产后盆腔器官脱垂的重要预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical effect and prognostic factor of electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse.

Objective: To explore the effects of electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy in patients with postpartum pelvic organ prolapse and to identify factors that can affect therapeutic efficacy outcomes.

Method: This retrospective study analysed clinical data about patients with postpartum pelvic organ prolapse. A total of 328 women with pelvic organ prolapse at 6 weeks postpartum were recruited from one tertiary hospitals in Sichuan province in China, between March 2019 and March 2022. The prognostic factors of therapeutic efficacy were analysed using logistic regression and decision tree model.

Results: Overall, 259 women showed clinical benefits from the treatment. The logistic regression model showed that parity, pelvic floor muscle training at home, and the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment were independent prognostic factors. The decision tree model showed that the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment was the main prognostic factor, followed by parity. There was no significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between the two models.

Conclusion: Parity, pelvic floor muscle training at home, and the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment were important prognostic factors of electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-informal caregiver's perspectives and experiences of the support network: a systematic literature review and meta-synthesis. A Freidsonian Analysis of The Professional trajectories of Public Health Nursing Specialists in Minas Gerais, Brazil, 1988-1992. Prevalence of risk factors among adolescents who suicide attempt: a cross-sectional study. Effect of cognitive-behavioral program on quality of life in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence: a randomized trial. Experiences of access and use of primary health care by users with systemic arterial hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1