开发术前提名图,预测根治性前列腺切除术后出现整体和多灶性手术切缘阳性的风险。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Imaging Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1186/s40644-024-00749-w
Lili Xu, Qianyu Peng, Gumuyang Zhang, Daming Zhang, Jiahui Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Xin Bai, Li Chen, Erjia Guo, Yu Xiao, Zhengyu Jin, Hao Sun
{"title":"开发术前提名图,预测根治性前列腺切除术后出现整体和多灶性手术切缘阳性的风险。","authors":"Lili Xu, Qianyu Peng, Gumuyang Zhang, Daming Zhang, Jiahui Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Xin Bai, Li Chen, Erjia Guo, Yu Xiao, Zhengyu Jin, Hao Sun","doi":"10.1186/s40644-024-00749-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop preoperative nomograms using risk factors based on clinicopathological and MRI for predicting the risk of positive surgical margin (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent prostate MRI before RP at our center between January 2015 and November 2022. Preoperative clinicopathological factors and MRI-based features were recorded for analysis. The presence of PSM (overall PSM [oPSM]) at pathology and the multifocality of PSM (mPSM) were evaluated. LASSO regression was employed for variable selection. For the final model construction, logistic regression was applied combined with the bootstrap method for internal verification. The risk probability of individual patients was visualized using a nomogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 259 patients were included in this study, and 76 (29.3%) patients had PSM, including 40 patients with mPSM. Final multivariate logistic regression revealed that the independent risk factors for oPSM were tumor diameter, frank extraprostatic extension, and annual surgery volume (all p < 0.05), and the nomogram for oPSM reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.717 in development and 0.716 in internal verification. The independent risk factors for mPSM included the percentage of positive cores, tumor diameter, apex depth, and annual surgery volume (all p < 0.05), and the AUC of the nomogram for mPSM was 0.790 in both development and internal verification. The calibration curve analysis showed that these nomograms were well-calibrated for both oPSM and mPSM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed nomograms showed good performance and were feasible in predicting oPSM and mPSM, which might facilitate more individualized management of prostate cancer patients who are candidates for surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"104"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11312749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of preoperative nomograms to predict the risk of overall and multifocal positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Lili Xu, Qianyu Peng, Gumuyang Zhang, Daming Zhang, Jiahui Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Xin Bai, Li Chen, Erjia Guo, Yu Xiao, Zhengyu Jin, Hao Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40644-024-00749-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop preoperative nomograms using risk factors based on clinicopathological and MRI for predicting the risk of positive surgical margin (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent prostate MRI before RP at our center between January 2015 and November 2022. Preoperative clinicopathological factors and MRI-based features were recorded for analysis. The presence of PSM (overall PSM [oPSM]) at pathology and the multifocality of PSM (mPSM) were evaluated. LASSO regression was employed for variable selection. For the final model construction, logistic regression was applied combined with the bootstrap method for internal verification. The risk probability of individual patients was visualized using a nomogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 259 patients were included in this study, and 76 (29.3%) patients had PSM, including 40 patients with mPSM. Final multivariate logistic regression revealed that the independent risk factors for oPSM were tumor diameter, frank extraprostatic extension, and annual surgery volume (all p < 0.05), and the nomogram for oPSM reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.717 in development and 0.716 in internal verification. The independent risk factors for mPSM included the percentage of positive cores, tumor diameter, apex depth, and annual surgery volume (all p < 0.05), and the AUC of the nomogram for mPSM was 0.790 in both development and internal verification. The calibration curve analysis showed that these nomograms were well-calibrated for both oPSM and mPSM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed nomograms showed good performance and were feasible in predicting oPSM and mPSM, which might facilitate more individualized management of prostate cancer patients who are candidates for surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11312749/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00749-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00749-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的利用基于临床病理学和 MRI 的风险因素制定术前提名图,用于预测根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后出现手术切缘阳性(PSM)的风险:本研究回顾性纳入了2015年1月至2022年11月期间在本中心接受前列腺MRI前列腺癌根治术的患者。记录术前临床病理因素和基于核磁共振成像的特征进行分析。评估病理时是否存在PSM(整体PSM [oPSM])以及PSM的多灶性(mPSM)。变量选择采用 LASSO 回归法。在构建最终模型时,采用了逻辑回归结合引导法进行内部验证。使用提名图直观显示了单个患者的风险概率:本研究共纳入 259 例患者,其中 76 例(29.3%)患者患有 PSM,包括 40 例 mPSM 患者。最终的多变量逻辑回归结果显示,肿瘤直径、坦率的前列腺外延伸和年手术量是导致 oPSM 的独立风险因素(均为 p):所提出的提名图在预测 oPSM 和 mPSM 方面显示出良好的性能和可行性,这可能有助于对适合手术的前列腺癌患者进行更个体化的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of preoperative nomograms to predict the risk of overall and multifocal positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.

Objective: To develop preoperative nomograms using risk factors based on clinicopathological and MRI for predicting the risk of positive surgical margin (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Patients and methods: This study retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent prostate MRI before RP at our center between January 2015 and November 2022. Preoperative clinicopathological factors and MRI-based features were recorded for analysis. The presence of PSM (overall PSM [oPSM]) at pathology and the multifocality of PSM (mPSM) were evaluated. LASSO regression was employed for variable selection. For the final model construction, logistic regression was applied combined with the bootstrap method for internal verification. The risk probability of individual patients was visualized using a nomogram.

Results: In all, 259 patients were included in this study, and 76 (29.3%) patients had PSM, including 40 patients with mPSM. Final multivariate logistic regression revealed that the independent risk factors for oPSM were tumor diameter, frank extraprostatic extension, and annual surgery volume (all p < 0.05), and the nomogram for oPSM reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.717 in development and 0.716 in internal verification. The independent risk factors for mPSM included the percentage of positive cores, tumor diameter, apex depth, and annual surgery volume (all p < 0.05), and the AUC of the nomogram for mPSM was 0.790 in both development and internal verification. The calibration curve analysis showed that these nomograms were well-calibrated for both oPSM and mPSM.

Conclusions: The proposed nomograms showed good performance and were feasible in predicting oPSM and mPSM, which might facilitate more individualized management of prostate cancer patients who are candidates for surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
期刊最新文献
Clinical significance of visual cardiac 18F-FDG uptake in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Nuclear medicine imaging in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: lessons learned from the past failures. Seeing through "brain fog": neuroimaging assessment and imaging biomarkers for cancer-related cognitive impairments. Prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis with short diameter less than 8 mm in papillary thyroid carcinoma based on radiomics. A call for objectivity: Radiologists' proposed wishlist for response evaluation in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1