药学院学生对技能活动中学术不诚实行为的看法。

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2024.04.009
Lena M. Maynor, Marina Galvez-Peralta, Ashleigh Barrickman
{"title":"药学院学生对技能活动中学术不诚实行为的看法。","authors":"Lena M. Maynor,&nbsp;Marina Galvez-Peralta,&nbsp;Ashleigh Barrickman","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Introduction: Academic dishonesty is prevalent across pharmacy education. Understanding student perceptions and engagement in academically dishonest behaviors across skills activities is important, as skills curricula are essential components in assessing APPE readiness. The objectives of this study were to assess pharmacy student perceptions of academically dishonest behavior within a skills curriculum and to determine if correlations exist between students' perceived wrongness of a described behavior and their willingness to engage in the behavior or past engagement in that described behavior.</p><p>Methods: Students within a Doctor of Pharmacy program were asked to respond to an anonymous, electronic survey. The survey described 18 specific academically dishonest student behaviors across 12 skills scenarios. For each behavior, students were asked to indicate their perception of the wrongness of the behavior, their willingness to engage in the behavior, and if they had engaged in the behavior in the past. Descriptive statistics were completed to assess responses. Fisher analysis was used to compare “yes” responses to “no/not sure” responses for each question.</p><p>Results: Students indicated general agreement that most described behaviors were wrong. There was &lt;50% agreement in the wrongness of behaviors that described failing to report another student's academically dishonest behavior. Generally, students who agreed that a particular behavior was wrong were less likely to report willingness to engage in the behavior or past engagement in the behavior.</p><p>Discussion: Generally, students in our cohort agreed that the presented actions across multiple skills activities were wrong, with less agreement regarding turning classmates in for academic dishonesty. Relatively small percentages of students responded that they had engaged in these activities in the past.</p><p>Conclusions: Understanding these perceptions, as well as students' willingness to engage in academic dishonesty, can guide instructors in communicating expectations regarding academic integrity within the skills curriculum.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"16 12","pages":"Article 102093"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacy student perceptions of academically dishonest behavior in skills activities\",\"authors\":\"Lena M. Maynor,&nbsp;Marina Galvez-Peralta,&nbsp;Ashleigh Barrickman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.04.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Introduction: Academic dishonesty is prevalent across pharmacy education. Understanding student perceptions and engagement in academically dishonest behaviors across skills activities is important, as skills curricula are essential components in assessing APPE readiness. The objectives of this study were to assess pharmacy student perceptions of academically dishonest behavior within a skills curriculum and to determine if correlations exist between students' perceived wrongness of a described behavior and their willingness to engage in the behavior or past engagement in that described behavior.</p><p>Methods: Students within a Doctor of Pharmacy program were asked to respond to an anonymous, electronic survey. The survey described 18 specific academically dishonest student behaviors across 12 skills scenarios. For each behavior, students were asked to indicate their perception of the wrongness of the behavior, their willingness to engage in the behavior, and if they had engaged in the behavior in the past. Descriptive statistics were completed to assess responses. Fisher analysis was used to compare “yes” responses to “no/not sure” responses for each question.</p><p>Results: Students indicated general agreement that most described behaviors were wrong. There was &lt;50% agreement in the wrongness of behaviors that described failing to report another student's academically dishonest behavior. Generally, students who agreed that a particular behavior was wrong were less likely to report willingness to engage in the behavior or past engagement in the behavior.</p><p>Discussion: Generally, students in our cohort agreed that the presented actions across multiple skills activities were wrong, with less agreement regarding turning classmates in for academic dishonesty. Relatively small percentages of students responded that they had engaged in these activities in the past.</p><p>Conclusions: Understanding these perceptions, as well as students' willingness to engage in academic dishonesty, can guide instructors in communicating expectations regarding academic integrity within the skills curriculum.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 102093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724000947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724000947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:学术不诚实在药学教育中普遍存在。了解学生对各种技能活动中学术不诚实行为的看法和参与情况非常重要,因为技能课程是评估 APPE 准备情况的重要组成部分。本研究的目的是评估药学专业学生对技能课程中学术不诚实行为的看法,并确定学生对所描述行为的错误认知与他们参与该行为的意愿或过去参与该行为的情况之间是否存在相关性:方法:要求药学博士课程的学生回答一份匿名电子调查问卷。调查描述了学生在 12 个技能场景中的 18 种具体的学术不诚实行为。对于每种行为,学生都被要求指出他们对该行为错误性的看法、他们是否愿意参与该行为以及他们过去是否参与过该行为。对学生的回答进行了描述性统计。费雪分析用于比较每个问题的 "是 "与 "否/不确定 "回答:结果:学生普遍认为大多数描述的行为都是错误的。讨论总体而言,我们这批学生都认为在多种技能活动中出现的行为是错误的,但对于告发同学学术不诚实行为的认同度较低。相对较小比例的学生回答说他们过去参与过这些活动:了解这些看法以及学生参与学术不诚实行为的意愿,可以指导教师在技能课程中传达有关学术诚信的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacy student perceptions of academically dishonest behavior in skills activities

Introduction: Academic dishonesty is prevalent across pharmacy education. Understanding student perceptions and engagement in academically dishonest behaviors across skills activities is important, as skills curricula are essential components in assessing APPE readiness. The objectives of this study were to assess pharmacy student perceptions of academically dishonest behavior within a skills curriculum and to determine if correlations exist between students' perceived wrongness of a described behavior and their willingness to engage in the behavior or past engagement in that described behavior.

Methods: Students within a Doctor of Pharmacy program were asked to respond to an anonymous, electronic survey. The survey described 18 specific academically dishonest student behaviors across 12 skills scenarios. For each behavior, students were asked to indicate their perception of the wrongness of the behavior, their willingness to engage in the behavior, and if they had engaged in the behavior in the past. Descriptive statistics were completed to assess responses. Fisher analysis was used to compare “yes” responses to “no/not sure” responses for each question.

Results: Students indicated general agreement that most described behaviors were wrong. There was <50% agreement in the wrongness of behaviors that described failing to report another student's academically dishonest behavior. Generally, students who agreed that a particular behavior was wrong were less likely to report willingness to engage in the behavior or past engagement in the behavior.

Discussion: Generally, students in our cohort agreed that the presented actions across multiple skills activities were wrong, with less agreement regarding turning classmates in for academic dishonesty. Relatively small percentages of students responded that they had engaged in these activities in the past.

Conclusions: Understanding these perceptions, as well as students' willingness to engage in academic dishonesty, can guide instructors in communicating expectations regarding academic integrity within the skills curriculum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preceptor perspectives on disability-related accommodations in pharmacy experiential education Practice transformation starts in the classroom: Mapping practice change learning in a PharmD program Keeping pace in the age of innovation: The perspective of Dutch pharmaceutical science students on the position of machine learning training in an undergraduate curriculum Live and learn: Utilizing MyDispense to increase student knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with diverse religious backgrounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1