魅力型领导战术量表的开发与验证:来自多源问卷研究、认知和行为评估以及领导力培训评估的证据

IF 7.8 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Review of Managerial Science Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1007/s11846-024-00782-w
Thomas Maran
{"title":"魅力型领导战术量表的开发与验证:来自多源问卷研究、认知和行为评估以及领导力培训评估的证据","authors":"Thomas Maran","doi":"10.1007/s11846-024-00782-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Charisma in managers is a leadership vitamin that enables them to lead more effectively and improve organizational performance. However, existing questionnaire measures of leaders’ charisma suffer from several limitations, primarily that they almost exclusively assess leaders’ charisma in terms of its effects rather than the constituent behaviors, thus conflating cause and effect. Employing the signaling approach to leaders' charisma, I developed and validated the Charismatic Leadership Tactics Scale (CLTS) across ten studies to measure leaders' charisma as an exogenous variable. Scale items were derived from empirical research on distinct charismatic leadership tactics. First, I established the factorial structure and internal consistency of the CLTS with managers (Study 1) and employees (Study 2). Second, I tested the agreement between manager and employee ratings and the scale’s convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity (Studies 3, 4). Third, I demonstrated that the CLTS relate to objectively measured harismatic tactics, the cognitive abilities underlying leaders’ charisma, and the outcomes that leaders’ charisma is expected to influence (external validity; Studies 5, 6, 7). Fourth, I showed the scale’s sensitivity to change in a charisma training program for managers (Study 8). Finally, I present a cross-cultural adaptation of the CLTS with managers (Study 9) and employees (Study 10). Utilizing diverse methodologies, including cross-sectional studies, automated behavioral assessments, cognitive tests, negotiation tasks, and a quasi-experimental training evaluation, these studies establish the CLTS as a valid instrument. The CLTS matches or exceeds established charismatic leadership measures while disentangling its measurement from endogenous or conflicting influences.</p>","PeriodicalId":20992,"journal":{"name":"Review of Managerial Science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and validating the charismatic leadership tactics scale: evidence from multi-source questionnaire studies, cognitive and behavioral assessments and a leadership training evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Maran\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11846-024-00782-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Charisma in managers is a leadership vitamin that enables them to lead more effectively and improve organizational performance. However, existing questionnaire measures of leaders’ charisma suffer from several limitations, primarily that they almost exclusively assess leaders’ charisma in terms of its effects rather than the constituent behaviors, thus conflating cause and effect. Employing the signaling approach to leaders' charisma, I developed and validated the Charismatic Leadership Tactics Scale (CLTS) across ten studies to measure leaders' charisma as an exogenous variable. Scale items were derived from empirical research on distinct charismatic leadership tactics. First, I established the factorial structure and internal consistency of the CLTS with managers (Study 1) and employees (Study 2). Second, I tested the agreement between manager and employee ratings and the scale’s convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity (Studies 3, 4). Third, I demonstrated that the CLTS relate to objectively measured harismatic tactics, the cognitive abilities underlying leaders’ charisma, and the outcomes that leaders’ charisma is expected to influence (external validity; Studies 5, 6, 7). Fourth, I showed the scale’s sensitivity to change in a charisma training program for managers (Study 8). Finally, I present a cross-cultural adaptation of the CLTS with managers (Study 9) and employees (Study 10). Utilizing diverse methodologies, including cross-sectional studies, automated behavioral assessments, cognitive tests, negotiation tasks, and a quasi-experimental training evaluation, these studies establish the CLTS as a valid instrument. The CLTS matches or exceeds established charismatic leadership measures while disentangling its measurement from endogenous or conflicting influences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Managerial Science\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Managerial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00782-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Managerial Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00782-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

管理者的魅力是一种领导力维他命,能使他们更有效地进行领导,提高组织绩效。然而,现有的领导者魅力问卷调查方法存在一些局限性,主要是几乎只从效果而非行为的角度来评估领导者的魅力,从而混淆了因果关系。我采用信号传递法来评估领导者的魅力,开发了魅力型领导策略量表(CLTS),并在十项研究中进行了验证,将领导者的魅力作为一个外生变量进行测量。量表项目来自于对不同魅力型领导策略的实证研究。首先,我在管理人员(研究 1)和员工(研究 2)中建立了 CLTS 的因子结构和内部一致性。其次,我测试了管理者和员工评分之间的一致性,以及量表的收敛效度、判别效度和增量效度(研究 3、4)。第三,我证明了CLTS与客观测量的恶意策略、领导者魅力背后的认知能力以及领导者魅力预期影响的结果相关(外部效度;研究5、6、7)。第四,我展示了该量表对经理人魅力培训项目变化的敏感性(研究 8)。最后,我介绍了针对管理人员(研究 9)和员工(研究 10)的跨文化适应性 CLTS。这些研究采用了不同的方法,包括横断面研究、自动行为评估、认知测试、谈判任务和准实验性培训评估,从而确定了 CLTS 是一种有效的工具。CLTS与已有的魅力型领导力测量方法相匹配,甚至更胜一筹,同时还将其测量方法与内源性或相互冲突的影响因素区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing and validating the charismatic leadership tactics scale: evidence from multi-source questionnaire studies, cognitive and behavioral assessments and a leadership training evaluation

Charisma in managers is a leadership vitamin that enables them to lead more effectively and improve organizational performance. However, existing questionnaire measures of leaders’ charisma suffer from several limitations, primarily that they almost exclusively assess leaders’ charisma in terms of its effects rather than the constituent behaviors, thus conflating cause and effect. Employing the signaling approach to leaders' charisma, I developed and validated the Charismatic Leadership Tactics Scale (CLTS) across ten studies to measure leaders' charisma as an exogenous variable. Scale items were derived from empirical research on distinct charismatic leadership tactics. First, I established the factorial structure and internal consistency of the CLTS with managers (Study 1) and employees (Study 2). Second, I tested the agreement between manager and employee ratings and the scale’s convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity (Studies 3, 4). Third, I demonstrated that the CLTS relate to objectively measured harismatic tactics, the cognitive abilities underlying leaders’ charisma, and the outcomes that leaders’ charisma is expected to influence (external validity; Studies 5, 6, 7). Fourth, I showed the scale’s sensitivity to change in a charisma training program for managers (Study 8). Finally, I present a cross-cultural adaptation of the CLTS with managers (Study 9) and employees (Study 10). Utilizing diverse methodologies, including cross-sectional studies, automated behavioral assessments, cognitive tests, negotiation tasks, and a quasi-experimental training evaluation, these studies establish the CLTS as a valid instrument. The CLTS matches or exceeds established charismatic leadership measures while disentangling its measurement from endogenous or conflicting influences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Review of Managerial Science (RMS) provides a forum for innovative research from all scientific areas of business administration. The journal publishes original research of high quality and is open to various methodological approaches (analytical modeling, empirical research, experimental work, methodological reasoning etc.). The scope of RMS encompasses – but is not limited to – accounting, auditing, banking, business strategy, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, financial structure and capital markets, health economics, human resources management, information systems, innovation management, insurance, marketing, organization, production and logistics, risk management and taxation. RMS also encourages the submission of papers combining ideas and/or approaches from different areas in an innovative way. Review papers presenting the state of the art of a research area and pointing out new directions for further research are also welcome. The scientific standards of RMS are guaranteed by a rigorous, double-blind peer review process with ad hoc referees and the journal´s internationally composed editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Does CSR facilitate access to trade credit? The role of family ownership Game on: curbing impulse buying and returns in apparel e-tailers Breaking or making futures: How laws and regulations shape innovation in emerging innovation systems From green HRM to SDG success: pathways through exploratory innovation and developmental culture Pathways to survive in abrupt adversities: a configurational approach to understanding the resilience of new venture teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1