分散治理环境下的可持续交通:华盛顿特区的案例

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105317
{"title":"分散治理环境下的可持续交通:华盛顿特区的案例","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Washington, District of Columbia (DC), like many cities around the world has responded to the UN's call to help national governments deliver on their 2030 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) covered under the UN's sustainable development goal #13, Climate Action. DC's contributions to the United States NDC include making its transportation sector sustainable. DC is part of the Washington Metro region which includes jurisdictions in Maryland and Virginia and during the week commuters from both states increase DC's population by almost 80 % exacerbating traffic congestion. Each jurisdiction in the region is responsible for its financial, transportation, and land use policies. To determine whether this system of fragmented governance impacts DC's transportation goals, this study used Banister's sustainable mobility framework to analyze transportation projects constructed or implemented in jurisdictions in the region. The results reveal that fragmented governance has led to jurisdictions in Maryland and Virginia placing greater emphasis on transportation projects that widen, extend, or create new roads and this tends to meet neighborhood or county needs instead of regional targets which would facilitate DC's efforts to reach its sustainable development goals. The study also finds regional agencies such as the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, and the Transportation Land-Use Connections Program do not have regulatory powers and hence cannot enforce transportation and land use policies nor fund any projects in the region instead each jurisdiction is responsible for its transportation and land use policies. The study also reveals that these regional agencies can be manipulated by local politicians and recommends the creation of a regional governing body that will make decisions on finance, land-use, housing, and transportation and be accountable to constituents and thus avoid interference from local politicians.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable transportation in fragmented governance settings: The case of Washington, DC\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Washington, District of Columbia (DC), like many cities around the world has responded to the UN's call to help national governments deliver on their 2030 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) covered under the UN's sustainable development goal #13, Climate Action. DC's contributions to the United States NDC include making its transportation sector sustainable. DC is part of the Washington Metro region which includes jurisdictions in Maryland and Virginia and during the week commuters from both states increase DC's population by almost 80 % exacerbating traffic congestion. Each jurisdiction in the region is responsible for its financial, transportation, and land use policies. To determine whether this system of fragmented governance impacts DC's transportation goals, this study used Banister's sustainable mobility framework to analyze transportation projects constructed or implemented in jurisdictions in the region. The results reveal that fragmented governance has led to jurisdictions in Maryland and Virginia placing greater emphasis on transportation projects that widen, extend, or create new roads and this tends to meet neighborhood or county needs instead of regional targets which would facilitate DC's efforts to reach its sustainable development goals. The study also finds regional agencies such as the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, and the Transportation Land-Use Connections Program do not have regulatory powers and hence cannot enforce transportation and land use policies nor fund any projects in the region instead each jurisdiction is responsible for its transportation and land use policies. The study also reveals that these regional agencies can be manipulated by local politicians and recommends the creation of a regional governing body that will make decisions on finance, land-use, housing, and transportation and be accountable to constituents and thus avoid interference from local politicians.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124005316\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124005316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哥伦比亚特区华盛顿(DC)与全球许多城市一样,响应联合国的号召,帮助各国政府实现联合国可持续发展目标第 13 项 "气候行动 "下的 2030 年国家减排目标(NDC)。华盛顿特区对美国 NDC 的贡献包括实现其交通部门的可持续发展。华盛顿特区是华盛顿都会区的一部分,该地区包括马里兰州和弗吉尼亚州的辖区,在一周内,来自这两个州的通勤者使华盛顿特区的人口增加了近 80%,加剧了交通拥堵。该地区的每个管辖区都负责其财政、交通和土地使用政策。为了确定这种各自为政的管理体制是否会影响华盛顿特区的交通目标,本研究采用 Banister 的可持续流动性框架,对该地区各辖区建设或实施的交通项目进行了分析。研究结果表明,各自为政导致马里兰州和弗吉尼亚州的辖区更加重视拓宽、延伸或新建道路的交通项目,而这往往是为了满足社区或县的需求,而非区域目标,这将促进特区努力实现其可持续发展目标。研究还发现,华盛顿大都会政府委员会、国家首都地区交通规划委员会和交通土地使用连接计划等区域机构没有监管权,因此不能执行交通和土地使用政策,也不能为区域内的任何项目提供资金,而是由各辖区负责其交通和土地使用政策。研究还显示,这些地区性机构可能会受到地方政客的操纵,因此建议建立一个地区性管理机构,就财政、土地使用、住房和交通等问题做出决策,并对选民负责,从而避免地方政客的干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainable transportation in fragmented governance settings: The case of Washington, DC

Washington, District of Columbia (DC), like many cities around the world has responded to the UN's call to help national governments deliver on their 2030 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) covered under the UN's sustainable development goal #13, Climate Action. DC's contributions to the United States NDC include making its transportation sector sustainable. DC is part of the Washington Metro region which includes jurisdictions in Maryland and Virginia and during the week commuters from both states increase DC's population by almost 80 % exacerbating traffic congestion. Each jurisdiction in the region is responsible for its financial, transportation, and land use policies. To determine whether this system of fragmented governance impacts DC's transportation goals, this study used Banister's sustainable mobility framework to analyze transportation projects constructed or implemented in jurisdictions in the region. The results reveal that fragmented governance has led to jurisdictions in Maryland and Virginia placing greater emphasis on transportation projects that widen, extend, or create new roads and this tends to meet neighborhood or county needs instead of regional targets which would facilitate DC's efforts to reach its sustainable development goals. The study also finds regional agencies such as the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, and the Transportation Land-Use Connections Program do not have regulatory powers and hence cannot enforce transportation and land use policies nor fund any projects in the region instead each jurisdiction is responsible for its transportation and land use policies. The study also reveals that these regional agencies can be manipulated by local politicians and recommends the creation of a regional governing body that will make decisions on finance, land-use, housing, and transportation and be accountable to constituents and thus avoid interference from local politicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
How do complete streets policies and legislative ordinances implement explicit wording regarding low-income populations and communities of color? A qualitative analysis Hot and bothered: Exploring the effect of heat on pedestrian route choice behavior and accessibility Does homeownership improve physical health? Evidence from a quasi-experiment in Hong Kong The recovery from the pandemic: A spatial-temporal analysis on the changes in mobility and public attitude in Singapore How to build vibrant communities by utilizing functional zones? A community-detection-based approach for revealing the association between land use and community vibrancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1