什罗普郡的救赎:约翰-奥德雷的颂歌、重复和忏悔权威

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS NEOPHILOLOGUS Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s11061-024-09815-x
Andrew Finn
{"title":"什罗普郡的救赎:约翰-奥德雷的颂歌、重复和忏悔权威","authors":"Andrew Finn","doi":"10.1007/s11061-024-09815-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this essay, I analyze the extent to which repetition can be considered creative in the context of penitential poetry, and what the ramifications are of that pairing for our own understandings of that poetry. When sin is inherited and confessions were guided by eminently repeatable <i>formulae</i>, how does penitential poetry come into being for the first time and enter penitential discourse as a “makyng” that is <i>created or made</i> yet already received, already repeated and circulating at the moment of its birth? The carol, I argue, presents a good place to address that question: its idiosyncratic formal components present a site of creativity and repetition between text and audience, a conjunction which anticipates the dynamics of filmic montage as conceived by Sergei Eisenstein. This aspect of the carol also invites us to explore how authority is created and received in the present moment, bereft of the difference from the present moment so often involved in constructing <i>auctoritas</i>. In conversation with Eisenstein, the medieval penitential carol ultimately becomes a site to reconsider how poetic form can simultaneously uphold and dismantle hierarchical relationships between creators and audiences. In so doing, the penitential carol invites us to re-approach our own critical “makyngs,” which effectively channel the work of medieval poetic form from centuries past.</p>","PeriodicalId":44392,"journal":{"name":"NEOPHILOLOGUS","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Shropshire Redemption: John Audelay’s Carols, Repetition, and Confessional Authority\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Finn\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11061-024-09815-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this essay, I analyze the extent to which repetition can be considered creative in the context of penitential poetry, and what the ramifications are of that pairing for our own understandings of that poetry. When sin is inherited and confessions were guided by eminently repeatable <i>formulae</i>, how does penitential poetry come into being for the first time and enter penitential discourse as a “makyng” that is <i>created or made</i> yet already received, already repeated and circulating at the moment of its birth? The carol, I argue, presents a good place to address that question: its idiosyncratic formal components present a site of creativity and repetition between text and audience, a conjunction which anticipates the dynamics of filmic montage as conceived by Sergei Eisenstein. This aspect of the carol also invites us to explore how authority is created and received in the present moment, bereft of the difference from the present moment so often involved in constructing <i>auctoritas</i>. In conversation with Eisenstein, the medieval penitential carol ultimately becomes a site to reconsider how poetic form can simultaneously uphold and dismantle hierarchical relationships between creators and audiences. In so doing, the penitential carol invites us to re-approach our own critical “makyngs,” which effectively channel the work of medieval poetic form from centuries past.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEOPHILOLOGUS\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEOPHILOLOGUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-024-09815-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEOPHILOLOGUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-024-09815-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我将分析在忏悔诗的语境中,重复在多大程度上可被视为具有创造性,以及这种配对对我们自己理解忏悔诗有何影响。当罪孽是遗传的,忏悔是以极易重复的公式为指导的时候,忏悔诗是如何首次出现并作为一种 "创造 "进入忏悔话语的,这种 "创造 "在其诞生的那一刻就已经被创造或被创造,已经被接受,已经被重复和流传?我认为,颂歌为解决这一问题提供了一个很好的场所:其特异的形式组成部分为文本与观众之间的创造和重复提供了场所,这种结合预示了谢尔盖-爱森斯坦(Sergei Eisenstein)所构想的电影蒙太奇的动态。这首颂歌的这一特点也促使我们探索在当下如何创造和接受权威,因为在构建 "权威 "的过程中,往往会与 "当下 "脱节。在与爱森斯坦的对话中,中世纪忏悔颂歌最终成为重新思考诗歌形式如何同时维护和瓦解创作者与受众之间等级关系的场所。在此过程中,忏悔颂歌邀请我们重新审视我们自己的批判性 "makyngs",这些 "makyngs "有效地引导了几个世纪以来中世纪诗歌形式的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Shropshire Redemption: John Audelay’s Carols, Repetition, and Confessional Authority

In this essay, I analyze the extent to which repetition can be considered creative in the context of penitential poetry, and what the ramifications are of that pairing for our own understandings of that poetry. When sin is inherited and confessions were guided by eminently repeatable formulae, how does penitential poetry come into being for the first time and enter penitential discourse as a “makyng” that is created or made yet already received, already repeated and circulating at the moment of its birth? The carol, I argue, presents a good place to address that question: its idiosyncratic formal components present a site of creativity and repetition between text and audience, a conjunction which anticipates the dynamics of filmic montage as conceived by Sergei Eisenstein. This aspect of the carol also invites us to explore how authority is created and received in the present moment, bereft of the difference from the present moment so often involved in constructing auctoritas. In conversation with Eisenstein, the medieval penitential carol ultimately becomes a site to reconsider how poetic form can simultaneously uphold and dismantle hierarchical relationships between creators and audiences. In so doing, the penitential carol invites us to re-approach our own critical “makyngs,” which effectively channel the work of medieval poetic form from centuries past.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEOPHILOLOGUS
NEOPHILOLOGUS Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Neophilologus is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the study of modern and medieval language and literature, including literary theory, comparative literature, philology and textual criticism. The languages of publication are English, French, German and Spanish.
期刊最新文献
Locating Anglo-Italian Communities in Bevis and the Naples Manuscript Elizabeth Acevedo, Laura Esquivel, and the Politics of Multilingualism La poesía de Quevedo al margen del Parnaso: hacia una edición crítica y anotada de la “musa décima” The Shropshire Redemption: John Audelay’s Carols, Repetition, and Confessional Authority Subject, Interest, and Community in Lynn Nottage’s Sweat and Dominique Morisseau’s Skeleton Crew
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1