利用半分布式流域模型估算多流域野火导致的溪流变化

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecohydrology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1002/eco.2697
Ryan Wells, Kyle R. Mankin, Jeffrey D. Niemann, Holm Kipka, Timothy R. Green, David M. Barnard
{"title":"利用半分布式流域模型估算多流域野火导致的溪流变化","authors":"Ryan Wells,&nbsp;Kyle R. Mankin,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Niemann,&nbsp;Holm Kipka,&nbsp;Timothy R. Green,&nbsp;David M. Barnard","doi":"10.1002/eco.2697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>More than half of water supply in the western United States is sourced from forested lands that are increasingly under wildfire risk. Studies have begun to isolate the effects of wildfire on streamflow, but they have typically used coarse temporal resolutions that cannot account for the numerous, interconnected watershed processes that control the responses to rainfall events. In this study, we employed a method to isolate fine-scale (daily) effects of fire. Wildfire effects were estimated as the difference between measured post-fire streamflow and unburned scenarios of post-fire streamflow simulated by a hydrologic model calibrated to pre-fire conditions. The method was applied to track hydrologic recovery after wildfires in six burned watersheds across the western United States: North Eagle Creek, NM (2012 Little Bear Fire), Lopez Creek, CA (1985 Las Pilitas Fire), City Creek, Devil Canyon Creek, East Twin Creek, and Plunge Creek, CA (2003 Old Fire). All six watersheds experienced prolonged increases of post-fire streamflow, with the most consistent changes occurring during periods of low streamflow. Following 6 years of increased streamflow, Lopez Creek experienced 6 years of reduced streamflow before returning to the pre-fire hydrologic regime. North Eagle Creek and the four watersheds affected by the Old Fire continued to have elevated streamflow 9 and 18 years post-fire, respectively, without returning to the pre-fire hydrologic regime.</p>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eco.2697","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating changes in streamflow attributable to wildfire in multiple watersheds using a semi-distributed watershed model\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Wells,&nbsp;Kyle R. Mankin,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Niemann,&nbsp;Holm Kipka,&nbsp;Timothy R. Green,&nbsp;David M. Barnard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eco.2697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>More than half of water supply in the western United States is sourced from forested lands that are increasingly under wildfire risk. Studies have begun to isolate the effects of wildfire on streamflow, but they have typically used coarse temporal resolutions that cannot account for the numerous, interconnected watershed processes that control the responses to rainfall events. In this study, we employed a method to isolate fine-scale (daily) effects of fire. Wildfire effects were estimated as the difference between measured post-fire streamflow and unburned scenarios of post-fire streamflow simulated by a hydrologic model calibrated to pre-fire conditions. The method was applied to track hydrologic recovery after wildfires in six burned watersheds across the western United States: North Eagle Creek, NM (2012 Little Bear Fire), Lopez Creek, CA (1985 Las Pilitas Fire), City Creek, Devil Canyon Creek, East Twin Creek, and Plunge Creek, CA (2003 Old Fire). All six watersheds experienced prolonged increases of post-fire streamflow, with the most consistent changes occurring during periods of low streamflow. Following 6 years of increased streamflow, Lopez Creek experienced 6 years of reduced streamflow before returning to the pre-fire hydrologic regime. North Eagle Creek and the four watersheds affected by the Old Fire continued to have elevated streamflow 9 and 18 years post-fire, respectively, without returning to the pre-fire hydrologic regime.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eco.2697\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.2697\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.2697","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国西部一半以上的水源来自林地,而林地面临的野火风险越来越大。已有研究开始分离野火对溪流的影响,但这些研究通常使用较粗的时间分辨率,无法解释控制降雨事件响应的众多相互关联的流域过程。在这项研究中,我们采用了一种方法来分离火灾的细尺度(日)影响。野火影响是通过测量火灾后的溪流与水文模型模拟的火灾后未燃烧溪流之间的差值来估算的,水文模型是根据火灾前的条件进行校准的。该方法被用于跟踪美国西部六个烧毁流域野火后的水文恢复情况:北达科他州北鹰溪(2012 年小熊火灾)、加利福尼亚州洛佩兹溪(1985 年拉斯皮利塔斯火灾)、城市溪、魔鬼峡谷溪、东双溪和加利福尼亚州 Plunge 溪(2003 年旧火灾)。所有六个流域在火灾后都经历了长时间的溪流增加,在溪流流量较低期间发生的变化最为一致。洛佩兹溪在经历了 6 年的溪流增加后,又经历了 6 年的溪流减少,然后才恢复到火灾前的水文状态。北鹰溪和受旧火灾影响的四个流域在火灾后分别持续 9 年和 18 年的时间里,溪流流量一直在增加,没有恢复到火灾前的水文状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating changes in streamflow attributable to wildfire in multiple watersheds using a semi-distributed watershed model

More than half of water supply in the western United States is sourced from forested lands that are increasingly under wildfire risk. Studies have begun to isolate the effects of wildfire on streamflow, but they have typically used coarse temporal resolutions that cannot account for the numerous, interconnected watershed processes that control the responses to rainfall events. In this study, we employed a method to isolate fine-scale (daily) effects of fire. Wildfire effects were estimated as the difference between measured post-fire streamflow and unburned scenarios of post-fire streamflow simulated by a hydrologic model calibrated to pre-fire conditions. The method was applied to track hydrologic recovery after wildfires in six burned watersheds across the western United States: North Eagle Creek, NM (2012 Little Bear Fire), Lopez Creek, CA (1985 Las Pilitas Fire), City Creek, Devil Canyon Creek, East Twin Creek, and Plunge Creek, CA (2003 Old Fire). All six watersheds experienced prolonged increases of post-fire streamflow, with the most consistent changes occurring during periods of low streamflow. Following 6 years of increased streamflow, Lopez Creek experienced 6 years of reduced streamflow before returning to the pre-fire hydrologic regime. North Eagle Creek and the four watersheds affected by the Old Fire continued to have elevated streamflow 9 and 18 years post-fire, respectively, without returning to the pre-fire hydrologic regime.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecohydrology
Ecohydrology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
116
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management. Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Temperature-driven convergence and divergence of ecohydrological dynamics in the ecosystems of a sky island mountain range Issue Information Soil Building and Capillary Barrier–Enhanced Water Availability Help Explain Pisonia grandis and Other Atoll Native's Tolerance for Variable Precipitation Regimes Analysis of Research Hot Spots in Chinese and International English Ecohydrological Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1