关于游戏和机制设计的表演性预测

António Góis, Mehrnaz Mofakhami, Fernando P. Santos, Simon Lacoste-Julien, Gauthier Gidel
{"title":"关于游戏和机制设计的表演性预测","authors":"António Góis, Mehrnaz Mofakhami, Fernando P. Santos, Simon Lacoste-Julien, Gauthier Gidel","doi":"arxiv-2408.05146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predictions often influence the reality which they aim to predict, an effect\nknown as performativity. Existing work focuses on accuracy maximization under\nthis effect, but model deployment may have important unintended impacts,\nespecially in multiagent scenarios. In this work, we investigate performative\nprediction in a concrete game-theoretic setting where social welfare is an\nalternative objective to accuracy maximization. We explore a collective risk\ndilemma scenario where maximising accuracy can negatively impact social\nwelfare, when predicting collective behaviours. By assuming knowledge of a\nBayesian agent behavior model, we then show how to achieve better trade-offs\nand use them for mechanism design.","PeriodicalId":501315,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Multiagent Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performative Prediction on Games and Mechanism Design\",\"authors\":\"António Góis, Mehrnaz Mofakhami, Fernando P. Santos, Simon Lacoste-Julien, Gauthier Gidel\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.05146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Predictions often influence the reality which they aim to predict, an effect\\nknown as performativity. Existing work focuses on accuracy maximization under\\nthis effect, but model deployment may have important unintended impacts,\\nespecially in multiagent scenarios. In this work, we investigate performative\\nprediction in a concrete game-theoretic setting where social welfare is an\\nalternative objective to accuracy maximization. We explore a collective risk\\ndilemma scenario where maximising accuracy can negatively impact social\\nwelfare, when predicting collective behaviours. By assuming knowledge of a\\nBayesian agent behavior model, we then show how to achieve better trade-offs\\nand use them for mechanism design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Multiagent Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Multiagent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.05146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Multiagent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.05146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测往往会影响其旨在预测的现实,这种效应被称为 "执行效应"。现有研究主要关注在这种效应下的准确性最大化,但模型部署可能会产生意想不到的重要影响,尤其是在多代理场景中。在这项工作中,我们研究了具体博弈论环境下的执行预测,在这种环境下,社会福利是准确性最大化的替代目标。我们探索了一种集体风险困境情景,在这种情景下,预测集体行为时,准确率最大化可能会对社会福利产生负面影响。通过假设贝叶斯代理行为模型的知识,我们展示了如何实现更好的权衡,并将其用于机制设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performative Prediction on Games and Mechanism Design
Predictions often influence the reality which they aim to predict, an effect known as performativity. Existing work focuses on accuracy maximization under this effect, but model deployment may have important unintended impacts, especially in multiagent scenarios. In this work, we investigate performative prediction in a concrete game-theoretic setting where social welfare is an alternative objective to accuracy maximization. We explore a collective risk dilemma scenario where maximising accuracy can negatively impact social welfare, when predicting collective behaviours. By assuming knowledge of a Bayesian agent behavior model, we then show how to achieve better trade-offs and use them for mechanism design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Putting Data at the Centre of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning HARP: Human-Assisted Regrouping with Permutation Invariant Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning On-policy Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning for Multi-UAV Exploration CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark Multi-agent Path Finding in Continuous Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1