果蔬食物浪费与中学生皮肤类胡萝卜素水平低有关

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.098
Lydia Roy BS, Amelia Sullivan MS, RDN, Bryn Kubinsky, Leigh Neptune RDN, MS, Jade McNamara PhD, RDN
{"title":"果蔬食物浪费与中学生皮肤类胡萝卜素水平低有关","authors":"Lydia Roy BS,&nbsp;Amelia Sullivan MS, RDN,&nbsp;Bryn Kubinsky,&nbsp;Leigh Neptune RDN, MS,&nbsp;Jade McNamara PhD, RDN","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides $14.2 billion annually to serve 4.9 billion lunches. While policies are in place to ensure students consume items from all food groups, food waste and poor diet quality remain prevalent. Qualitative photograph estimation is frequently utilized to assess food waste. The Veggie Meter® (VM) is a validated tool that objectively evaluates fruit and vegetable (FV) intake by measuring skin carotenoid levels.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Qualitatively assess tray waste among middle school students utilizing before and after lunch tray photographs while quantitatively comparing their VM scores to FV tray waste.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Researchers photographed 57 student lunch trays at a rural middle school. The VM assessed FV intake in a subsample of 39 students.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Trays were tracked using a non-identifiable ID code. Photographs were matched and independently coded by three coders using the Comstock indirect measurement technique, in which scores (0-5) inversely reflect intake of each food item. Inter-rater agreement was 90%. Means and standard deviations were calculated for individual food items and total lunch tray waste. VM scores range from 0-850, with higher scores indicating higher FV intake. A Pearson's correlation determined the relationship between VM score and individual food item intake on a subsample of participants. Significance was set at p&lt;0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On average, 50% of food on the lunch trays was discarded. Of all tray waste, 75% of the participants discarded uneaten fruits and vegetables. Overall, participants had low VM scores (173.5±61.1; n = 39). There was a significant negative correlation between VM scores and waste of vegetable items (r=-0.37, p=0.035) and fruit items (r=-0.38, p=0.021).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Considering the vast NSLP funding, the issue of food waste should be considered. This study revealed high tray waste, with the highest amount documented in FV items. Further, students' food waste was correlated with low FV intake. This highlights the need for programming that addresses food waste and FV consumption in rural middle school students.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>NIFA</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"56 8","pages":"Page S42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fruit and Vegetable Food Waste is Correlated With Low Skin Carotenoid Levels in Middle School Students\",\"authors\":\"Lydia Roy BS,&nbsp;Amelia Sullivan MS, RDN,&nbsp;Bryn Kubinsky,&nbsp;Leigh Neptune RDN, MS,&nbsp;Jade McNamara PhD, RDN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides $14.2 billion annually to serve 4.9 billion lunches. While policies are in place to ensure students consume items from all food groups, food waste and poor diet quality remain prevalent. Qualitative photograph estimation is frequently utilized to assess food waste. The Veggie Meter® (VM) is a validated tool that objectively evaluates fruit and vegetable (FV) intake by measuring skin carotenoid levels.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Qualitatively assess tray waste among middle school students utilizing before and after lunch tray photographs while quantitatively comparing their VM scores to FV tray waste.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Researchers photographed 57 student lunch trays at a rural middle school. The VM assessed FV intake in a subsample of 39 students.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Trays were tracked using a non-identifiable ID code. Photographs were matched and independently coded by three coders using the Comstock indirect measurement technique, in which scores (0-5) inversely reflect intake of each food item. Inter-rater agreement was 90%. Means and standard deviations were calculated for individual food items and total lunch tray waste. VM scores range from 0-850, with higher scores indicating higher FV intake. A Pearson's correlation determined the relationship between VM score and individual food item intake on a subsample of participants. Significance was set at p&lt;0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On average, 50% of food on the lunch trays was discarded. Of all tray waste, 75% of the participants discarded uneaten fruits and vegetables. Overall, participants had low VM scores (173.5±61.1; n = 39). There was a significant negative correlation between VM scores and waste of vegetable items (r=-0.37, p=0.035) and fruit items (r=-0.38, p=0.021).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Considering the vast NSLP funding, the issue of food waste should be considered. This study revealed high tray waste, with the highest amount documented in FV items. Further, students' food waste was correlated with low FV intake. This highlights the need for programming that addresses food waste and FV consumption in rural middle school students.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>NIFA</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"56 8\",\"pages\":\"Page S42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001982\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景全国学校午餐计划(NSLP)每年提供 142 亿美元,用于供应 49 亿份午餐。虽然已有政策确保学生食用所有食物类别中的食物,但食物浪费和饮食质量低下的现象仍然普遍存在。定性照片估算经常被用来评估食物浪费。研究设计、地点、参与者研究人员拍摄了一所农村中学的 57 个学生午餐托盘。可测量的结果/分析使用不可识别的 ID 代码对托盘进行跟踪。照片由三名编码员使用康斯托克间接测量技术进行匹配和独立编码,该技术的分数(0-5 分)反向反映了每种食物的摄入量。评分者之间的一致率为 90%。计算了单项食品和餐盘总浪费量的平均值和标准差。VM评分范围为0-850分,分数越高,说明食物类脂摄入量越高。通过皮尔逊相关分析,确定了子样本参与者的 VM 分数与单项食物摄入量之间的关系。结果平均有 50%的午餐托盘上的食物被丢弃。在所有餐盘垃圾中,75% 的参与者丢弃了未吃完的水果和蔬菜。总体而言,参与者的 VM 分数较低(173.5±61.1;n = 39)。VM 分数与蔬菜浪费(r=-0.37,p=0.035)和水果浪费(r=-0.38,p=0.021)之间存在明显的负相关。本研究显示,托盘浪费现象严重,其中以水果和蔬菜浪费最多。此外,学生的食物浪费与低FV摄入量相关。这凸显了针对农村中学生的食物浪费和低脂食物摄入量制定方案的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fruit and Vegetable Food Waste is Correlated With Low Skin Carotenoid Levels in Middle School Students

Background

The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) provides $14.2 billion annually to serve 4.9 billion lunches. While policies are in place to ensure students consume items from all food groups, food waste and poor diet quality remain prevalent. Qualitative photograph estimation is frequently utilized to assess food waste. The Veggie Meter® (VM) is a validated tool that objectively evaluates fruit and vegetable (FV) intake by measuring skin carotenoid levels.

Objective

Qualitatively assess tray waste among middle school students utilizing before and after lunch tray photographs while quantitatively comparing their VM scores to FV tray waste.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

Researchers photographed 57 student lunch trays at a rural middle school. The VM assessed FV intake in a subsample of 39 students.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Trays were tracked using a non-identifiable ID code. Photographs were matched and independently coded by three coders using the Comstock indirect measurement technique, in which scores (0-5) inversely reflect intake of each food item. Inter-rater agreement was 90%. Means and standard deviations were calculated for individual food items and total lunch tray waste. VM scores range from 0-850, with higher scores indicating higher FV intake. A Pearson's correlation determined the relationship between VM score and individual food item intake on a subsample of participants. Significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

On average, 50% of food on the lunch trays was discarded. Of all tray waste, 75% of the participants discarded uneaten fruits and vegetables. Overall, participants had low VM scores (173.5±61.1; n = 39). There was a significant negative correlation between VM scores and waste of vegetable items (r=-0.37, p=0.035) and fruit items (r=-0.38, p=0.021).

Conclusions

Considering the vast NSLP funding, the issue of food waste should be considered. This study revealed high tray waste, with the highest amount documented in FV items. Further, students' food waste was correlated with low FV intake. This highlights the need for programming that addresses food waste and FV consumption in rural middle school students.

Funding

NIFA

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
期刊最新文献
"All You Need to Manage Blood Pressure": A Comprehensive e-Education Program for Hypertension. Highlighting the Importance of Policy, Systems and Environmental Change Interventions in Nutrition Education and Behavior? Impact of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend and Nutrition Education on Child Growth, Caregivers' Nutrition Knowledge, and WASH Practices. Nutrition Education in Primary Care: Comparing Video vs Handout Interventions. The 2022 Minnesota Statewide Food Shelf Survey: Reported Availability of Healthy Foods and Importance of Culturally-specific Foods by Participant Demographic Characteristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1