{"title":"非粮食社会安全网计划与粮食安全之间关系的范围审查","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Households with low incomes are more likely to experience food and nutrition insecurity due to limited financial resources for necessities. Social safety net programs may improve food and nutrition security by relieving households’ financial strain. Although the relationship between federal nutrition assistance programs and food security is well understood, to date, no reviews have been conducted on the relationship between non-food social safety net programs and food and nutrition security. This evidence is needed to inform evidence-driven policymaking, particularly in the context of increasing food insecurity in recent years.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Conduct a scoping review to summarize the state of the evidence on the relationship between participation in non-food social safety net programs in the US and food and nutrition security.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>We systematically searched 6 databases for peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between non-food social safety net programs and food security, nutrition security, or related constructs.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sr)</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-five articles have been identified that examine a wide range of social safety net programs including tax credits (n=14), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (n=11), Medicaid (n=9), housing assistance (n=5), unemployment insurance (n=9), stimulus payments (n=4), and others (n=13). Twenty-one studies focus on COVID-19 pandemic-era social safety net programs. We will synthesize across studies to describe differences in the relationship between social safety net program participation and food or nutrition security by: program type, multiple vs. single program participation, food vs. nutrition insecurity, participant demographics, and elements of program administration such as disbursement method. We will identify gaps in the existing evidence base and directions for future research. Full results are forthcoming.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A review on the relationship between non-food social safety net program participation and food and nutrition security can inform policymaking, resource allocation, and efforts to ensure the potential nutrition benefits of such programs are realized equally among participants.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Robert Wood Johnson Foundation</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoping Review of the Relationship Between Non-Food Social Safety Net Programs and Food Security\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Households with low incomes are more likely to experience food and nutrition insecurity due to limited financial resources for necessities. Social safety net programs may improve food and nutrition security by relieving households’ financial strain. Although the relationship between federal nutrition assistance programs and food security is well understood, to date, no reviews have been conducted on the relationship between non-food social safety net programs and food and nutrition security. This evidence is needed to inform evidence-driven policymaking, particularly in the context of increasing food insecurity in recent years.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Conduct a scoping review to summarize the state of the evidence on the relationship between participation in non-food social safety net programs in the US and food and nutrition security.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>We systematically searched 6 databases for peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between non-food social safety net programs and food security, nutrition security, or related constructs.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sr)</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-five articles have been identified that examine a wide range of social safety net programs including tax credits (n=14), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (n=11), Medicaid (n=9), housing assistance (n=5), unemployment insurance (n=9), stimulus payments (n=4), and others (n=13). Twenty-one studies focus on COVID-19 pandemic-era social safety net programs. We will synthesize across studies to describe differences in the relationship between social safety net program participation and food or nutrition security by: program type, multiple vs. single program participation, food vs. nutrition insecurity, participant demographics, and elements of program administration such as disbursement method. We will identify gaps in the existing evidence base and directions for future research. Full results are forthcoming.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A review on the relationship between non-food social safety net program participation and food and nutrition security can inform policymaking, resource allocation, and efforts to ensure the potential nutrition benefits of such programs are realized equally among participants.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Robert Wood Johnson Foundation</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001817\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Scoping Review of the Relationship Between Non-Food Social Safety Net Programs and Food Security
Background
Households with low incomes are more likely to experience food and nutrition insecurity due to limited financial resources for necessities. Social safety net programs may improve food and nutrition security by relieving households’ financial strain. Although the relationship between federal nutrition assistance programs and food security is well understood, to date, no reviews have been conducted on the relationship between non-food social safety net programs and food and nutrition security. This evidence is needed to inform evidence-driven policymaking, particularly in the context of increasing food insecurity in recent years.
Objective
Conduct a scoping review to summarize the state of the evidence on the relationship between participation in non-food social safety net programs in the US and food and nutrition security.
Study Design, Settings, Participants
We systematically searched 6 databases for peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between non-food social safety net programs and food security, nutrition security, or related constructs.
Measurable Outcome/Analysis
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-Sr)
Results
Sixty-five articles have been identified that examine a wide range of social safety net programs including tax credits (n=14), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (n=11), Medicaid (n=9), housing assistance (n=5), unemployment insurance (n=9), stimulus payments (n=4), and others (n=13). Twenty-one studies focus on COVID-19 pandemic-era social safety net programs. We will synthesize across studies to describe differences in the relationship between social safety net program participation and food or nutrition security by: program type, multiple vs. single program participation, food vs. nutrition insecurity, participant demographics, and elements of program administration such as disbursement method. We will identify gaps in the existing evidence base and directions for future research. Full results are forthcoming.
Conclusions
A review on the relationship between non-food social safety net program participation and food and nutrition security can inform policymaking, resource allocation, and efforts to ensure the potential nutrition benefits of such programs are realized equally among participants.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas.
The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.