够公平吗?解读德国能源系统转型的公正视角

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103691
{"title":"够公平吗?解读德国能源系统转型的公正视角","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The German energy system transformation, known as Energiewende, has gained significant political attention in the national discourse over the past decade. However, the implementation of the Energiewende has raised concerns about the justice of the transformation process among broader parts of society. This research article examines energy justice perceptions among uninvolved citizens in three rural areas (Ahrweiler, Ferdinandshof, Spremberg) experiencing conflicts over energy infrastructure projects. The residents' perceptions and experiences of energy justice are analyzed along the tenets of distributive, procedural, and recognitional justice, utilizing interviews and focus group material conducted between December 2020 and May 2022 in a secondary analysis approach. The paper describes justice perceptions among the uninvolved citizens in their daily communication, thereby identifying potential political mobilization and conflict issues. The study uncovers heterogeneous and sometimes conflicting perceptions of justice, influenced by local context and historical experiences. Key issues include distributional concerns over financial resource allocation and procedural justice debates regarding the degree and nature of citizen participation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002822/pdfft?md5=5ed7ca513cbd8c7d528846f3fca8ecd3&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002822-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fair enough? Unraveling justice perspectives on Germany's energy system transformation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The German energy system transformation, known as Energiewende, has gained significant political attention in the national discourse over the past decade. However, the implementation of the Energiewende has raised concerns about the justice of the transformation process among broader parts of society. This research article examines energy justice perceptions among uninvolved citizens in three rural areas (Ahrweiler, Ferdinandshof, Spremberg) experiencing conflicts over energy infrastructure projects. The residents' perceptions and experiences of energy justice are analyzed along the tenets of distributive, procedural, and recognitional justice, utilizing interviews and focus group material conducted between December 2020 and May 2022 in a secondary analysis approach. The paper describes justice perceptions among the uninvolved citizens in their daily communication, thereby identifying potential political mobilization and conflict issues. The study uncovers heterogeneous and sometimes conflicting perceptions of justice, influenced by local context and historical experiences. Key issues include distributional concerns over financial resource allocation and procedural justice debates regarding the degree and nature of citizen participation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002822/pdfft?md5=5ed7ca513cbd8c7d528846f3fca8ecd3&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002822-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002822\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002822","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,被称为 "能源之路 "的德国能源系统转型在国家讨论中获得了极大的政治关注。然而,Energiewende 的实施也引发了社会各界对转型过程公正性的担忧。本文研究了三个农村地区(Ahrweiler、Ferdinandshof、Spremberg)未参与能源基础设施项目冲突的公民对能源公正的看法。本文采用二次分析方法,利用 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 5 月期间进行的访谈和焦点小组材料,按照分配正义、程序正义和认可正义的原则,分析了居民对能源正义的看法和体验。论文描述了未参与公民在日常交流中对正义的看法,从而发现潜在的政治动员和冲突问题。研究发现,受当地环境和历史经验的影响,人们对司法的看法各不相同,有时甚至相互冲突。关键问题包括对财政资源分配的分配关切,以及有关公民参与程度和性质的程序正义辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fair enough? Unraveling justice perspectives on Germany's energy system transformation

The German energy system transformation, known as Energiewende, has gained significant political attention in the national discourse over the past decade. However, the implementation of the Energiewende has raised concerns about the justice of the transformation process among broader parts of society. This research article examines energy justice perceptions among uninvolved citizens in three rural areas (Ahrweiler, Ferdinandshof, Spremberg) experiencing conflicts over energy infrastructure projects. The residents' perceptions and experiences of energy justice are analyzed along the tenets of distributive, procedural, and recognitional justice, utilizing interviews and focus group material conducted between December 2020 and May 2022 in a secondary analysis approach. The paper describes justice perceptions among the uninvolved citizens in their daily communication, thereby identifying potential political mobilization and conflict issues. The study uncovers heterogeneous and sometimes conflicting perceptions of justice, influenced by local context and historical experiences. Key issues include distributional concerns over financial resource allocation and procedural justice debates regarding the degree and nature of citizen participation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Making space for environmental justice in renewable energy planning Large inequalities in climate mitigation scenarios are not supported by theories of distributive justice Embracing complexity: Microgrids and community engagement in Australia Policy mixes for net-zero energy transitions: Insights from energy sector integration in Germany Enablers or barriers: The multifaceted tales of power generation companies in China's energy transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1