探究无房参与者对食物分配计划的认知接受程度和食物利用障碍

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.009
Erica Tovar BS, Mi Zhou MPH, PhD, Susan Chen PhD
{"title":"探究无房参与者对食物分配计划的认知接受程度和食物利用障碍","authors":"Erica Tovar BS,&nbsp;Mi Zhou MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Susan Chen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Community food assistance programs are vital to addressing food security (FS) among unhoused individuals, yet limited research on barriers to utilizing foods obtained from these programs exists for this population.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the perceived acceptance of a food distribution program (FDP) and related food utilization barriers (FUB) for unhoused individuals in Felton, California.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>A mixed-methods interview was conducted with individuals utilizing an FDP. The inclusion criteria were English-speaking adults over 18 years of age who met FDP eligibility and utilized the program. The interview guide contained five open-ended items on program acceptability and 14 validated quantitative items to assess FS and FUB. Probing questions prompted participants to elaborate upon FUB. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was met.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Descriptive data on demographics, FUB, and FS levels were analyzed using SPSS. FDP acceptability and probing questions about FUB were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (N=10) mentioned high program acceptance and reported high FUB (n=7, 70%) and very low FS (n=8, 80%). Themes included: program appreciation and enhancement; FUB and enablers; external food-related factors; and community belonging. Participants appreciated the staff, yet offered suggestions for available food items. Common FUBs included the lack of refrigeration, cooking utensils, and large kitchen appliances. Participants commented on the increased cost of food and extreme weather as external barriers to their food supply; however, sharing food among community members and group cooking were mentioned as positive factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This research revealed how unhoused populations manage their food supply despite facing multiple adversities. Despite the high acceptance of the local FDP, participants experienced very low FS and high FUB levels. Further research should explore the impact of climate change and community belonging on FUB and FS levels. Policies and programs could focus on systemic changes to address the root causes of FUB and food insecurity for unhoused populations.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>San Jose State University Circle of Friends Research Assistance Award</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"56 8","pages":"Page S2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Unhoused Participants' Perceived Acceptance of a Food Distribution Program and Food Utilization Barriers\",\"authors\":\"Erica Tovar BS,&nbsp;Mi Zhou MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Susan Chen PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Community food assistance programs are vital to addressing food security (FS) among unhoused individuals, yet limited research on barriers to utilizing foods obtained from these programs exists for this population.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the perceived acceptance of a food distribution program (FDP) and related food utilization barriers (FUB) for unhoused individuals in Felton, California.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>A mixed-methods interview was conducted with individuals utilizing an FDP. The inclusion criteria were English-speaking adults over 18 years of age who met FDP eligibility and utilized the program. The interview guide contained five open-ended items on program acceptability and 14 validated quantitative items to assess FS and FUB. Probing questions prompted participants to elaborate upon FUB. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was met.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Descriptive data on demographics, FUB, and FS levels were analyzed using SPSS. FDP acceptability and probing questions about FUB were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (N=10) mentioned high program acceptance and reported high FUB (n=7, 70%) and very low FS (n=8, 80%). Themes included: program appreciation and enhancement; FUB and enablers; external food-related factors; and community belonging. Participants appreciated the staff, yet offered suggestions for available food items. Common FUBs included the lack of refrigeration, cooking utensils, and large kitchen appliances. Participants commented on the increased cost of food and extreme weather as external barriers to their food supply; however, sharing food among community members and group cooking were mentioned as positive factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This research revealed how unhoused populations manage their food supply despite facing multiple adversities. Despite the high acceptance of the local FDP, participants experienced very low FS and high FUB levels. Further research should explore the impact of climate change and community belonging on FUB and FS levels. Policies and programs could focus on systemic changes to address the root causes of FUB and food insecurity for unhoused populations.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>San Jose State University Circle of Friends Research Assistance Award</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"56 8\",\"pages\":\"Page S2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S149940462400109X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S149940462400109X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景社区食品援助计划对于解决无住房者的食品安全(FS)问题至关重要,但针对这一人群利用这些计划所提供食品的障碍的研究却十分有限。研究设计、环境、参与者对利用食品分配计划的个人进行了混合方法访谈。纳入标准是年龄在 18 岁以上、符合家庭发展计划资格并使用该计划的英语成年人。访谈指南包含 5 个关于项目可接受性的开放式项目和 14 个经过验证的定量项目,用于评估 FS 和 FUB。探究性问题促使参与者详细阐述 FUB。访谈进行到数据饱和为止。可衡量的结果/分析访谈进行了录音和逐字记录。使用 SPSS 对人口统计学、FUB 和 FS 水平的描述性数据进行分析。结果参与者(10 人)表示对项目的接受度很高,并报告了较高的 FUB(7 人,70%)和很低的 FS(8 人,80%)。主题包括:计划的赞赏和提高;家庭和社区行动及推动因素;与食物有关的外部因素;社区归属感。参与者对工作人员表示赞赏,但也对可提供的食品提出了建议。常见的困难和障碍包括缺乏冷藏设备、炊具和大型厨房用具。参与者认为,食品成本增加和极端天气是影响他们食品供应的外部障碍;然而,社区成员之间分享食品和集体烹饪被认为是积极因素。尽管当地家庭发展计划的接受度很高,但参与者的食物供应量(FS)很低,而食物不足(FUB)水平很高。进一步的研究应探讨气候变化和社区归属感对 FUB 和 FS 水平的影响。政策和计划可侧重于系统性变革,以解决无房人口的 FUB 和粮食不安全的根源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring Unhoused Participants' Perceived Acceptance of a Food Distribution Program and Food Utilization Barriers

Background

Community food assistance programs are vital to addressing food security (FS) among unhoused individuals, yet limited research on barriers to utilizing foods obtained from these programs exists for this population.

Objective

To explore the perceived acceptance of a food distribution program (FDP) and related food utilization barriers (FUB) for unhoused individuals in Felton, California.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

A mixed-methods interview was conducted with individuals utilizing an FDP. The inclusion criteria were English-speaking adults over 18 years of age who met FDP eligibility and utilized the program. The interview guide contained five open-ended items on program acceptability and 14 validated quantitative items to assess FS and FUB. Probing questions prompted participants to elaborate upon FUB. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was met.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Descriptive data on demographics, FUB, and FS levels were analyzed using SPSS. FDP acceptability and probing questions about FUB were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Participants (N=10) mentioned high program acceptance and reported high FUB (n=7, 70%) and very low FS (n=8, 80%). Themes included: program appreciation and enhancement; FUB and enablers; external food-related factors; and community belonging. Participants appreciated the staff, yet offered suggestions for available food items. Common FUBs included the lack of refrigeration, cooking utensils, and large kitchen appliances. Participants commented on the increased cost of food and extreme weather as external barriers to their food supply; however, sharing food among community members and group cooking were mentioned as positive factors.

Conclusions

This research revealed how unhoused populations manage their food supply despite facing multiple adversities. Despite the high acceptance of the local FDP, participants experienced very low FS and high FUB levels. Further research should explore the impact of climate change and community belonging on FUB and FS levels. Policies and programs could focus on systemic changes to address the root causes of FUB and food insecurity for unhoused populations.

Funding

San Jose State University Circle of Friends Research Assistance Award

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
期刊最新文献
"All You Need to Manage Blood Pressure": A Comprehensive e-Education Program for Hypertension. Highlighting the Importance of Policy, Systems and Environmental Change Interventions in Nutrition Education and Behavior? Impact of Harvest Lentil Vegetable Blend and Nutrition Education on Child Growth, Caregivers' Nutrition Knowledge, and WASH Practices. Nutrition Education in Primary Care: Comparing Video vs Handout Interventions. The 2022 Minnesota Statewide Food Shelf Survey: Reported Availability of Healthy Foods and Importance of Culturally-specific Foods by Participant Demographic Characteristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1