{"title":"能源公正的公共价值观视角:构建理解能源转型决策的理论视角","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy justice literature provides no clear indications on why energy justice is sometimes not safeguarded in decision-making processes. What is needed is a theoretical understanding of how decision-makers balance different considerations. Drawing on public values theory, we build a theoretical lens for understanding decision-making in the energy transition. Through this lens, we recognize that decision-makers can (i) altogether <em>overlook</em> justice<em>,</em> (ii) <em>misunderstand</em> justice as something other than energy justice, or (iii) <em>sideline</em> energy justice. To analyze decision-making processes through this lens, we introduce a three-step research approach. The first step involves mapping the multitude of public values at stake in energy system change. The second and third steps focus on identifying which public values are pursued and how decision-makers balance these values. In this article, we cover the first step by presenting a public values categorization based on literature review, thereby providing a stepping stone for future research using the public values approach. Ultimately, the public values approach offers essential insights into whether and how decision-makers in the energy transition consider and balance justice concerns. These insights can serve as starting points for more in-depth studies on the factors shaping decision-makers' value orientations and decision-making processes. As such, the theoretical approach presented in this paper provides the basis for developing an understanding of decision-making in the energy transition and its impact on energy justice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002688/pdfft?md5=1f89f17d1ce92d16b864a43d1369451f&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002688-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A public values perspective on energy justice: Building a theoretical lens for understanding decision-making in the energy transition\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Energy justice literature provides no clear indications on why energy justice is sometimes not safeguarded in decision-making processes. What is needed is a theoretical understanding of how decision-makers balance different considerations. Drawing on public values theory, we build a theoretical lens for understanding decision-making in the energy transition. Through this lens, we recognize that decision-makers can (i) altogether <em>overlook</em> justice<em>,</em> (ii) <em>misunderstand</em> justice as something other than energy justice, or (iii) <em>sideline</em> energy justice. To analyze decision-making processes through this lens, we introduce a three-step research approach. The first step involves mapping the multitude of public values at stake in energy system change. The second and third steps focus on identifying which public values are pursued and how decision-makers balance these values. In this article, we cover the first step by presenting a public values categorization based on literature review, thereby providing a stepping stone for future research using the public values approach. Ultimately, the public values approach offers essential insights into whether and how decision-makers in the energy transition consider and balance justice concerns. These insights can serve as starting points for more in-depth studies on the factors shaping decision-makers' value orientations and decision-making processes. As such, the theoretical approach presented in this paper provides the basis for developing an understanding of decision-making in the energy transition and its impact on energy justice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002688/pdfft?md5=1f89f17d1ce92d16b864a43d1369451f&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002688-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002688\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A public values perspective on energy justice: Building a theoretical lens for understanding decision-making in the energy transition
Energy justice literature provides no clear indications on why energy justice is sometimes not safeguarded in decision-making processes. What is needed is a theoretical understanding of how decision-makers balance different considerations. Drawing on public values theory, we build a theoretical lens for understanding decision-making in the energy transition. Through this lens, we recognize that decision-makers can (i) altogether overlook justice, (ii) misunderstand justice as something other than energy justice, or (iii) sideline energy justice. To analyze decision-making processes through this lens, we introduce a three-step research approach. The first step involves mapping the multitude of public values at stake in energy system change. The second and third steps focus on identifying which public values are pursued and how decision-makers balance these values. In this article, we cover the first step by presenting a public values categorization based on literature review, thereby providing a stepping stone for future research using the public values approach. Ultimately, the public values approach offers essential insights into whether and how decision-makers in the energy transition consider and balance justice concerns. These insights can serve as starting points for more in-depth studies on the factors shaping decision-makers' value orientations and decision-making processes. As such, the theoretical approach presented in this paper provides the basis for developing an understanding of decision-making in the energy transition and its impact on energy justice.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.