能源公正的公共价值观视角:构建理解能源转型决策的理论视角

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103677
{"title":"能源公正的公共价值观视角:构建理解能源转型决策的理论视角","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy justice literature provides no clear indications on why energy justice is sometimes not safeguarded in decision-making processes. What is needed is a theoretical understanding of how decision-makers balance different considerations. Drawing on public values theory, we build a theoretical lens for understanding decision-making in the energy transition. Through this lens, we recognize that decision-makers can (i) altogether <em>overlook</em> justice<em>,</em> (ii) <em>misunderstand</em> justice as something other than energy justice, or (iii) <em>sideline</em> energy justice. To analyze decision-making processes through this lens, we introduce a three-step research approach. The first step involves mapping the multitude of public values at stake in energy system change. The second and third steps focus on identifying which public values are pursued and how decision-makers balance these values. In this article, we cover the first step by presenting a public values categorization based on literature review, thereby providing a stepping stone for future research using the public values approach. Ultimately, the public values approach offers essential insights into whether and how decision-makers in the energy transition consider and balance justice concerns. These insights can serve as starting points for more in-depth studies on the factors shaping decision-makers' value orientations and decision-making processes. As such, the theoretical approach presented in this paper provides the basis for developing an understanding of decision-making in the energy transition and its impact on energy justice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002688/pdfft?md5=1f89f17d1ce92d16b864a43d1369451f&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002688-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A public values perspective on energy justice: Building a theoretical lens for understanding decision-making in the energy transition\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Energy justice literature provides no clear indications on why energy justice is sometimes not safeguarded in decision-making processes. What is needed is a theoretical understanding of how decision-makers balance different considerations. Drawing on public values theory, we build a theoretical lens for understanding decision-making in the energy transition. Through this lens, we recognize that decision-makers can (i) altogether <em>overlook</em> justice<em>,</em> (ii) <em>misunderstand</em> justice as something other than energy justice, or (iii) <em>sideline</em> energy justice. To analyze decision-making processes through this lens, we introduce a three-step research approach. The first step involves mapping the multitude of public values at stake in energy system change. The second and third steps focus on identifying which public values are pursued and how decision-makers balance these values. In this article, we cover the first step by presenting a public values categorization based on literature review, thereby providing a stepping stone for future research using the public values approach. Ultimately, the public values approach offers essential insights into whether and how decision-makers in the energy transition consider and balance justice concerns. These insights can serve as starting points for more in-depth studies on the factors shaping decision-makers' value orientations and decision-making processes. As such, the theoretical approach presented in this paper provides the basis for developing an understanding of decision-making in the energy transition and its impact on energy justice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002688/pdfft?md5=1f89f17d1ce92d16b864a43d1369451f&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002688-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002688\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源公正方面的文献没有明确说明为什么在决策过程中有时无法保障能源公正。我们需要从理论上理解决策者如何平衡不同的考虑因素。借鉴公共价值理论,我们建立了一个理论视角,用于理解能源转型中的决策。通过这一视角,我们认识到决策者可能会(i)完全忽视公正,(ii)将公正误解为能源公正之外的其他公正,或(iii)将能源公正搁置一边。为了从这个角度分析决策过程,我们引入了一种分三步的研究方法。第一步涉及绘制与能源系统变革相关的众多公共价值观。第二步和第三步的重点是确定哪些公共价值是决策者所追求的,以及决策者如何平衡这些价值。在本文中,我们将介绍第一步的内容,即根据文献综述对公共价值观进行分类,从而为今后使用公共价值观方法开展研究奠定基础。最终,公共价值观方法为能源转型中的决策者是否以及如何考虑和平衡公正问题提供了重要见解。这些见解可以作为出发点,对影响决策者价值取向和决策过程的因素进行更深入的研究。因此,本文提出的理论方法为理解能源转型中的决策及其对能源公正的影响提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A public values perspective on energy justice: Building a theoretical lens for understanding decision-making in the energy transition

Energy justice literature provides no clear indications on why energy justice is sometimes not safeguarded in decision-making processes. What is needed is a theoretical understanding of how decision-makers balance different considerations. Drawing on public values theory, we build a theoretical lens for understanding decision-making in the energy transition. Through this lens, we recognize that decision-makers can (i) altogether overlook justice, (ii) misunderstand justice as something other than energy justice, or (iii) sideline energy justice. To analyze decision-making processes through this lens, we introduce a three-step research approach. The first step involves mapping the multitude of public values at stake in energy system change. The second and third steps focus on identifying which public values are pursued and how decision-makers balance these values. In this article, we cover the first step by presenting a public values categorization based on literature review, thereby providing a stepping stone for future research using the public values approach. Ultimately, the public values approach offers essential insights into whether and how decision-makers in the energy transition consider and balance justice concerns. These insights can serve as starting points for more in-depth studies on the factors shaping decision-makers' value orientations and decision-making processes. As such, the theoretical approach presented in this paper provides the basis for developing an understanding of decision-making in the energy transition and its impact on energy justice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Making space for environmental justice in renewable energy planning Large inequalities in climate mitigation scenarios are not supported by theories of distributive justice Embracing complexity: Microgrids and community engagement in Australia Policy mixes for net-zero energy transitions: Insights from energy sector integration in Germany Enablers or barriers: The multifaceted tales of power generation companies in China's energy transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1