通过生命周期评估揭示中国农业土壤修复战略的环境效益和影响因素

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107850
{"title":"通过生命周期评估揭示中国农业土壤修复战略的环境效益和影响因素","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable remediation is crucial for agricultural soil in China as 19.4 % of soil samples are contaminated by toxic substances. Current remediation strategies, classification management and pollution grading, cannot support sustainable remediation because of lacking refined zoning and over-engineering. To address these shortcomings, we synthesized a new strategy: classification, grading, and zoning (CGZ), and performed a life cycle assessment to determine its benefits. The results showed that the CGZ strategy reduced environmental impacts by 24 % and 19 % when applied in 1.45 km<sup>2</sup> of contaminated land (3 years from survey to remediation). These reductions were attributed to optimizing remediation technologies for various planting zones and minimizing the remediation area through balancing the primary and secondary impacts of pre-surveys and the remediation itself. Meanwhile, sustaining these remediation efforts over the long term must include equitable farmer compensation based on crop type to mitigate future environmental consequences associated with farmers switching crops.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment to unravel environmental benefits and influencing factors of agricultural soil remediation strategies in China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sustainable remediation is crucial for agricultural soil in China as 19.4 % of soil samples are contaminated by toxic substances. Current remediation strategies, classification management and pollution grading, cannot support sustainable remediation because of lacking refined zoning and over-engineering. To address these shortcomings, we synthesized a new strategy: classification, grading, and zoning (CGZ), and performed a life cycle assessment to determine its benefits. The results showed that the CGZ strategy reduced environmental impacts by 24 % and 19 % when applied in 1.45 km<sup>2</sup> of contaminated land (3 years from survey to remediation). These reductions were attributed to optimizing remediation technologies for various planting zones and minimizing the remediation area through balancing the primary and secondary impacts of pre-surveys and the remediation itself. Meanwhile, sustaining these remediation efforts over the long term must include equitable farmer compensation based on crop type to mitigate future environmental consequences associated with farmers switching crops.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924004439\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924004439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国,19.4% 的土壤样本受到有毒物质的污染,因此可持续的土壤修复对农业土壤至关重要。由于缺乏精细分区和过度工程化,目前的修复策略--分类管理和污染分级--无法支持可持续修复。针对这些不足,我们总结了一种新策略:分类、分级和分区(CGZ),并进行了生命周期评估,以确定其效益。结果表明,在 1.45 平方公里的受污染土地上采用 CGZ 策略(从调查到修复需要 3 年时间),环境影响分别减少了 24% 和 19%。这些影响的减少归因于针对不同种植区优化了修复技术,并通过平衡前期调查和修复本身的主要和次要影响,最大限度地减少了修复面积。与此同时,要长期保持这些修复工作,必须根据作物类型对农民进行公平补偿,以减轻未来农民更换作物对环境造成的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Life cycle assessment to unravel environmental benefits and influencing factors of agricultural soil remediation strategies in China

Sustainable remediation is crucial for agricultural soil in China as 19.4 % of soil samples are contaminated by toxic substances. Current remediation strategies, classification management and pollution grading, cannot support sustainable remediation because of lacking refined zoning and over-engineering. To address these shortcomings, we synthesized a new strategy: classification, grading, and zoning (CGZ), and performed a life cycle assessment to determine its benefits. The results showed that the CGZ strategy reduced environmental impacts by 24 % and 19 % when applied in 1.45 km2 of contaminated land (3 years from survey to remediation). These reductions were attributed to optimizing remediation technologies for various planting zones and minimizing the remediation area through balancing the primary and secondary impacts of pre-surveys and the remediation itself. Meanwhile, sustaining these remediation efforts over the long term must include equitable farmer compensation based on crop type to mitigate future environmental consequences associated with farmers switching crops.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Unlocking sustainable lithium: A comparative life cycle assessment of innovative extraction methods from brine Packaging the future: Determinants of use intentions and incentive structures of reusable packaging systems Sustainable electroless nutrient recovery from natural agro-industrial and livestock farm wastewater effluents with a flow cell reactor Evaluation of sustainable waste management: An analysis of techno-economic and life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste sorting and decontamination Mining the atmosphere: A concrete solution to global warming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1