良性和边缘性鳞状上皮肿瘤的切除缘宽度≥1 厘米对减少复发有必要吗?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/1432313
Nattakarn Changchit, Natthawadee Laokulrath, Pradit Rushatamukayanunt, Pongthep Pisarnturakit
{"title":"良性和边缘性鳞状上皮肿瘤的切除缘宽度≥1 厘米对减少复发有必要吗?","authors":"Nattakarn Changchit,&nbsp;Natthawadee Laokulrath,&nbsp;Pradit Rushatamukayanunt,&nbsp;Pongthep Pisarnturakit","doi":"10.1155/2024/1432313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are fibroepithelial neoplasms of the breast, with current treatment guidelines recommending wide excision to achieve surgical margins of ≥1 cm to minimize the recurrence risk. However, diagnostic challenges with core biopsy specimens often result in suboptimal surgical margins. This study aims to elucidate the correlation between margin status and PT recurrence, thereby informing surgical decision-making and enhancing patient outcomes. <i>Methods</i>. This single-center, retrospective study reviewed records of Thai women diagnosed with PTs between 2011 and 2018, collecting data on demographics, clinical presentation, surgical approach, tumor grade, size, and margin status. The primary endpoint was recurrence. <i>Results</i>. Among 165 PT cases analyzed—49.1% borderline, 38.2% benign, and 12.7% malignant—the overall recurrence rate was 13.9% (<i>n</i> = 23) over a median follow-up of 4.5 years. No significant difference in recurrence rates was observed between patients with negative resection margins &lt;1 cm (ranging from &lt;1 mm to 9 mm) compared to those with ≥1 cm (10.2% vs. 7.1%, <i>p</i> = 1.00). Notably, in negative resection margins &lt;1 cm group, a margin &lt;1 mm (close margin) was associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate compared to margins of 1–9 mm (17.0% vs. 4.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Borderline PTs followed the overall trend, while benign PTs showed increased recurrence with positive margins. Multivariate analysis indicated a significant association between margins &lt;1 mm and recurrence (adjusted HR = 10.78 (95% CI 1.32–88.07), <i>p</i> = 0.027), highlighting an increased recurrence risk with more extensive positive margins. <i>Conclusion</i>. Our findings suggest that a wide surgical margin of ≥1 centimeter may not be necessary to prevent recurrence in benign and borderline PTs. Notably, surgical margins narrower than 1 millimeter substantially elevate the recurrence likelihood in cases of borderline PTs. Furthermore, the presence of positive surgical margins correlates with an increased recurrence rate in benign PTs. These findings highlight the critical need for a strategic approach in determining surgical margins, tailored specifically to the type of PT, to enhance patient outcomes effectively.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1432313","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the ≥1 cm Width of the Resection Margin in Benign and Borderline Phyllodes Tumor Necessary to Reduce Recurrence?\",\"authors\":\"Nattakarn Changchit,&nbsp;Natthawadee Laokulrath,&nbsp;Pradit Rushatamukayanunt,&nbsp;Pongthep Pisarnturakit\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/1432313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Background</i>. Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are fibroepithelial neoplasms of the breast, with current treatment guidelines recommending wide excision to achieve surgical margins of ≥1 cm to minimize the recurrence risk. However, diagnostic challenges with core biopsy specimens often result in suboptimal surgical margins. This study aims to elucidate the correlation between margin status and PT recurrence, thereby informing surgical decision-making and enhancing patient outcomes. <i>Methods</i>. This single-center, retrospective study reviewed records of Thai women diagnosed with PTs between 2011 and 2018, collecting data on demographics, clinical presentation, surgical approach, tumor grade, size, and margin status. The primary endpoint was recurrence. <i>Results</i>. Among 165 PT cases analyzed—49.1% borderline, 38.2% benign, and 12.7% malignant—the overall recurrence rate was 13.9% (<i>n</i> = 23) over a median follow-up of 4.5 years. No significant difference in recurrence rates was observed between patients with negative resection margins &lt;1 cm (ranging from &lt;1 mm to 9 mm) compared to those with ≥1 cm (10.2% vs. 7.1%, <i>p</i> = 1.00). Notably, in negative resection margins &lt;1 cm group, a margin &lt;1 mm (close margin) was associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate compared to margins of 1–9 mm (17.0% vs. 4.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Borderline PTs followed the overall trend, while benign PTs showed increased recurrence with positive margins. Multivariate analysis indicated a significant association between margins &lt;1 mm and recurrence (adjusted HR = 10.78 (95% CI 1.32–88.07), <i>p</i> = 0.027), highlighting an increased recurrence risk with more extensive positive margins. <i>Conclusion</i>. Our findings suggest that a wide surgical margin of ≥1 centimeter may not be necessary to prevent recurrence in benign and borderline PTs. Notably, surgical margins narrower than 1 millimeter substantially elevate the recurrence likelihood in cases of borderline PTs. Furthermore, the presence of positive surgical margins correlates with an increased recurrence rate in benign PTs. These findings highlight the critical need for a strategic approach in determining surgical margins, tailored specifically to the type of PT, to enhance patient outcomes effectively.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Journal\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1432313\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1432313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1432313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。鳞状上皮肿瘤(PTs)是乳腺纤维上皮肿瘤,目前的治疗指南建议广泛切除,使手术切缘≥1厘米,以最大限度地降低复发风险。然而,核心活检标本的诊断难题往往导致手术切缘不理想。本研究旨在阐明边缘状态与 PT 复发之间的相关性,从而为手术决策提供依据,提高患者的治疗效果。方法。这项单中心回顾性研究回顾了 2011 年至 2018 年间被诊断为 PT 的泰国女性的病历,收集了有关人口统计学、临床表现、手术方法、肿瘤分级、大小和边缘状态的数据。主要终点是复发。结果。在分析的165例PT病例中,49.1%为边缘性,38.2%为良性,12.7%为恶性,中位随访4.5年,总复发率为13.9%(n = 23)。切除边缘<1厘米(从<1毫米到9毫米不等)阴性的患者与切除边缘≥1厘米的患者相比,复发率无明显差异(10.2% vs. 7.1%,p = 1.00)。值得注意的是,在切除边缘<1厘米阴性组中,边缘<1毫米(近边缘)与1-9毫米边缘相比,复发率明显更高(17.0% vs. 4.9%,p = 0.04)。边缘PT的复发率与总体趋势一致,而良性PT的复发率则随着边缘阳性而增加。多变量分析表明,边缘<1 mm与复发之间存在显著关联(调整后HR = 10.78 (95% CI 1.32-88.07),p = 0.027),凸显出边缘阳性范围越广,复发风险越高。结论我们的研究结果表明,对于良性和边缘型 PT,≥1 厘米的宽手术切缘可能不是防止复发的必要条件。值得注意的是,手术切缘窄于 1 毫米会大大增加边缘型 PT 复发的可能性。此外,手术切缘呈阳性与良性 PT 复发率增加有关。这些研究结果突出表明,在确定手术切缘时亟需一种专门针对 PT 类型的战略性方法,以有效提高患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is the ≥1 cm Width of the Resection Margin in Benign and Borderline Phyllodes Tumor Necessary to Reduce Recurrence?

Background. Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are fibroepithelial neoplasms of the breast, with current treatment guidelines recommending wide excision to achieve surgical margins of ≥1 cm to minimize the recurrence risk. However, diagnostic challenges with core biopsy specimens often result in suboptimal surgical margins. This study aims to elucidate the correlation between margin status and PT recurrence, thereby informing surgical decision-making and enhancing patient outcomes. Methods. This single-center, retrospective study reviewed records of Thai women diagnosed with PTs between 2011 and 2018, collecting data on demographics, clinical presentation, surgical approach, tumor grade, size, and margin status. The primary endpoint was recurrence. Results. Among 165 PT cases analyzed—49.1% borderline, 38.2% benign, and 12.7% malignant—the overall recurrence rate was 13.9% (n = 23) over a median follow-up of 4.5 years. No significant difference in recurrence rates was observed between patients with negative resection margins <1 cm (ranging from <1 mm to 9 mm) compared to those with ≥1 cm (10.2% vs. 7.1%, p = 1.00). Notably, in negative resection margins <1 cm group, a margin <1 mm (close margin) was associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate compared to margins of 1–9 mm (17.0% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.04). Borderline PTs followed the overall trend, while benign PTs showed increased recurrence with positive margins. Multivariate analysis indicated a significant association between margins <1 mm and recurrence (adjusted HR = 10.78 (95% CI 1.32–88.07), p = 0.027), highlighting an increased recurrence risk with more extensive positive margins. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that a wide surgical margin of ≥1 centimeter may not be necessary to prevent recurrence in benign and borderline PTs. Notably, surgical margins narrower than 1 millimeter substantially elevate the recurrence likelihood in cases of borderline PTs. Furthermore, the presence of positive surgical margins correlates with an increased recurrence rate in benign PTs. These findings highlight the critical need for a strategic approach in determining surgical margins, tailored specifically to the type of PT, to enhance patient outcomes effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
期刊最新文献
Intramammary Tumor Location and Ipsilateral Lymphatic Spread in Early Breast Cancer Patients Using One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) Assay Relationship Between Mitochondrial Biological Function and Breast Cancer Unveiling miRNA30b’s Role in Suppressing ADAM12 to Combat Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Effect of Estrogen Receptor on the Relationship Between HER2 Immunohistochemistry Score and Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1